Comparison among Chargers of Electric Vehicle Based on Different Control Strategies
- 1 State Key Laboratory for Alternate Electrical Power System with Renewable Energy Sources, North China Electric Power University, Beijing, China
- 2 State Key Laboratory for Alternate Electrical Power System with Renewable Energy Sources, North China Electric Power University, Beijing, China
- 3 State Key Laboratory for Alternate Electrical Power System with Renewable Energy Sources, North China Electric Power University, Beijing, China
Abstract
The charger of electric vehicle is a power electronic device which consists of rectifying devices and DC-DC converters. This nonlinear diode rectifier circuit has low power factor and high harmonic content. In order to improve power factor and reduce the harmonic distortion rate of the AC side current, single-phase non-controlled rectifier charger needs to install the active power factor correction device. A piece of power system analysis software which is called PSCAD is used in modeling of an EV charger which contains Boost-APFC. By means of simulation and analysis, differences of APFC characteristics between the hysteresis current control mode and average current control mode which has an influence on the power grid are compared. The consequence of simulation shows that the two control strategies achieve power factor correction and harmonic reduction requirements; Boost type power conversion circuit employs the average current control mode is better, which has following features: relatively faster settling time of the output voltage, relatively smaller overshoot, lower current harmonic distortion rate on AC side, lower switching frequency and better control effect .
- H. Xin, “Low Carbon Economy and Electric Vehicles: Trends and Policies,” China Opening Herald，2009，Vol. 10, No. 5, pp. 31-35.
- N. Li and M. Huang, “Comparison among Chargers of Electric Vehicle Based on Different Rectifiers,” North China Electric Power. No. 1, 2011.
- X. Chen, P. Li, W. T. Hu, et al., “Analysis of Impacts of Electric Vehicle Charger on Power Grid Harmonic,” Electric Power, Vol. 41, No. 9, 2008, pp. 31-36．
- Users' Guide on the Use of PSCAD, Manitabo HVDC research center.
- H. B. Sun, “The Compare-Study of Topology and Control Strategies about the Charging System in Vehicle,” Journal of Tianjin University of Technology, Vol. 47, 2007.
- J. Zhang, J. Shao and F. C. Lee, “Evaluation of Input Current in the Critical Mode Boost PFC Converter for Distributed Power System,” Conference Proceedings-IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition-APFC, 2001.
- Q. Li, Y. Deng and X. N. He, “Research on Low Power Boost. APFC with Different Control Strategies,” Power Electronics. Power Electronics, No. 6.
- O. Garcia，J. A. Cobos, R. Prieto, et al., “Single Phase Power Factor Correction: A Survey,” IEEE Transactions, Vol. 18, No. 3, 2003, pp. 749-755.
- H. Stork, “Changing the rules in Power Electronics,” IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition, APEC’ 2005, Austin, Texas, Vol. 1, 2005, pp. 26-31.
- Y. H. Tian, X. H. Wang and J. H. Lu, “The Design and Simulation of Single Phase Boost Power Factor Corrector Circuit,” Journal of Jiamusi University, Nov2008. Vol．26, No．6.
- G. W. Moon, “Predictive Current Control of Distribution Static Compensator for Reactive Power Compensation,” IEE Proceedings of Gener Transm. Distrib. 1999, pp. 515-520. doi:10.1049/ip-gtd:19996598
- L. Qi, Z. Q. Xi, Z. Q. Xin and W. C. Huang, “Research on Single Phase APFC with Method of Hysteresis Control,” Editorial Department of Hubei University of Technology, Vol. 25, No. 1, 2010, pp. 52-54.
- Y. F. Zhou，J. C. Huang, S. B. Wang, et al., “Principle of Designing Slope Compensation in PFC Boost converter,” Sci China Ser I, Vol. 52, No. 11, 2009, pp. 2226-2233. doi:10.1007/s11432-009-0178-6
- H. Wang, X. J. Yang and X. Cai, “Study and Implementation of Digital APFC on Variable PI Regulator,” Power Electronics, Vol. 45, No. 1, 2011.