Alternative Approaches for Distinguishing between Faults and Inrush Current in Power Transformers
- 1 Electrical Networks Department, Public Authority for Applied Education and Training, Adailiyah, Kuwait
- 2 Electrical Networks Department, Public Authority for Applied Education and Training, Adailiyah, Kuwait
Abstract
In this study, we will cover the basic methods used to distinguish between inrush current and fault current in power transformers. First, the nature of inrush current is presented compared to the fault current. Then the nature of the magnetizing current due to energizing a power transformer at no-load is explained. The first generation of methods used to disable the protective relay system during inrush current, namely the Desensitizing and Tripping Suppressor, is introduced. The second generation, the harmonic restraint method and the waveform-based restraint method with their different versions, is explained. Then we will explore thoroughly the fictitious equivalent resistance method as an example of the third generation of model type restraining or blocking methods. Finally, a comparison between these methods and conclusion is carried out.
- IEEE Tutorial Course: Advancements in Microprocessors Based Protection and Communication (1997) IEEE Catalog No. 97TP120-0.
- Kasztenny, B., Rosoloeski, E., Saha, M.M. and Hillstrom, B. (1996) A Comparative Analysis of Protection Principles for Multi-Criteria Power Transformer Relaying. Proceedings of the 12th Power Systems Computation Conference, Dresden, 19-23 August 1996, 107-113.
- Habib, M. and Marin, M.A. (1988) A Comparative Analysis of Digital Relaying Algorithms for the Differential Protection of Three Phase Transformers. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 3, 1501-1508. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/59.14605
- Mason, C.R. (1986) The Art and Science of Protective Relaying. 2nd Edition, John Wiley, New York.
- Blume, L.F. (1951) Transformer Engineering, Wiley & Sons, New York.
- Karsai, K., Kerenyi, D. and Kiss, L. (1987) Large Power Transformers. Elsevier, New York.
- Bogdan, K. and Ara, K. An Improved Transformer Inrush Restraint Algorithm Increases Security While Maintaining Fault Response Performance. 53rd Annual Conference for Protective Relay Engineers.
- Horowitz, S.H. and Phadke, A.G. (1992) Power System Relaying, Wily & Sons, New York.
- Armando, G. (2001) A Current-Based Solution for Transformer Differential Protection. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 16, 485-491.
- Inagaki, K., Higaki, M., Matsui, Y., Kurita, K., Suzuki, M., Yushida, K. and Maeda, T. (1988) Digital Protection Method for Power Transformers Based on an Equivalent Circuit Composed of Inverse Inductance. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 3, 1501-1510. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/61.193949
- Yabe, K. (1997) Power Differential Method for Discrimination between Fault and Magnetizing Inrush Current in Transformers. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 12, 1109-1118. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/61.636909
- Grcar, B., Stumberger, G. and Pehler, J. (1996) Transformer Protection Based on the New Theoretical Background and with Improved Inrush Recognition. Proceedings of 12th PSCC, 101-106.
- Kasztenny, B., Rosolowski, E., Saha, M. and Hillstrom, B. (1996) A Comparative Analysis of Protection Principles for Multi-Criteria Power Transformers Relaying. Proceedings of 12th PSCC, 107-113.
- Guocai, S. and Dachan, Y. (2000) Identifying Internal Faults of Transformers through the Similarity Degree between Voltage and Current. Proceedings of IEEE/PES 2000 Winter Meeting, 1151-1156.