A Theoretical Approach to Estimating Bird Risk of Collision with Wind Turbines Where Empirical Flight Activity Data Are Lacking — Oak Academic Publishing
Research ArticleOpen AccessGoogle Scholar indexed
A Theoretical Approach to Estimating Bird Risk of Collision with Wind Turbines Where Empirical Flight Activity Data Are Lacking
MacArthur Green, Glasgow, UK
,
MacArthur Green, Glasgow, UK
,
MacArthur Green, Glasgow, UK
,
Scottish Natural Heritage, Great Glen House, Inverness, UK
1 MacArthur Green, Glasgow, UK
2 MacArthur Green, Glasgow, UK
3 MacArthur Green, Glasgow, UK
4 Scottish Natural Heritage, Great Glen House, Inverness, UK
There are standard procedures for collecting data on numbers of birds at sites being proposed for wind farm development and evaluating collision risk for each key species. However, methods do not work well for all species. Where a local bird population is depleted, empirical data cannot provide estimates of likely collision mortality numbers if that population returns to satisfactory conservation status. Field survey methods are also inadequate for cryptic bird species. Both these problems can be important for evaluation of impacts of proposed wind farms on bird populations protected by the EU Birds Directive. We present an alternative method, based on energy constrained activity budgets and natural history, which permits assessment of likely collision numbers where empirical data are inadequate. Two case studies are presented where this approach has been successfully used to resolve disputed planning applications, one for a hen harrier population where numbers present are much below the population size at designation, and one for a cryptic species (greenshank). Our novel method helps reduce uncertainty in assessments constrained by difficulties in collecting suitable empirical data.
European Commission (2011) Energy Roadmap 2050.COM885/2.
Federal Ministry of Economics and Technology (2010) Energy Concept for an Environmentally Sound, Reliable and Affordable Energy Supply. Federal Ministry of Economics and Technology, Berlin.
European Wind Energy Association (2015) Wind in power 2014 European Statistics. European Wind Energy Association, Brussels.
Drewitt, A.L. and Langston, R.H.W. (2006) Assessing the Impacts of Wind Farms on Birds. Ibis, 148, 29-42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1474-919X.2006.00516.x
Dahl, E.L., Bevanger, K., Nygard, T., Roskaft, E. and Stokke, B.G. (2012) Reduced Breeding Success in White-Tailed Eagles at Sm?la Windfarm, Western Norway, Is Caused by Mortality and Displacement. Biological Conservation, 135, 79-85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2011.10.012
Fielding, A., Haworth, P., Whitfield, P., McLeod, D. and Riley, H. (2011) A Conservation Framework for Hen Harriers in the United Kingdom. JNCC Report No. 441. Joint Nature Conservation Committee, Peterborough.
Natural England (1992) EC Directive 79/409 on the Conservation of Wild Birds: Special Protection Area Bowland Fells (Lancashire). Secretary of State for the Environment, London.
Hayhow, D.B., Eaton, M.A., Bladwell, S., Etheridge, B., Ewing, S.R., Ruddock, M., et al. (2013) The Status of the Hen Harrier, Circus Cyaneus, in the UK and Isle of Man in 2010. Bird Study, 60, 446-458. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00063657.2013.839621
Shaffer, S.A., Costa, D.P. and Weimerskirch, H. (2003) Foraging Effort in Relation to the Constraints of Reproduction in Free-Ranging Albatrosses. Functional Ecology, 17, 66-74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2435.2003.00705.x
Pennycuick, C.J. (2008) Modelling the Flying Bird. Elsevier Academic Press, Amsterdam and London.
Drent, R.H. and Daan, S. (1980) The Prudent Parent: Energetic Adjustments in Avian Breeding. Ardea, 68, 225-252.
Nagy, K.A. (2005) Field Metabolic Rate and Body Size. Journal of Experimental Biology, 208, 1621-1625. http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jeb.01553
Moore, S.J. (Ed.) (2005) Seeking Nature’s Limits: Ecologists in the Field. KNNV Publishing, Utrecht.
Green, J.A., Aitken-Simpson, E.J., White, C.R., Bunce, A., Butler, P.J. and Frappell, P.B. (2013) An Increase in Minimum Metabolic Rate and Not Activity Explains Field Metabolic Rate Changes in a Breeding Seabird. Journal of Experimental Biology, 216, 1726-1735. http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jeb.085092
Johnston, D.W. and McFarlane, R.W. (1967) Migration and Bioenergetics of Flight in Pacific Golden Plover. Condor, 69, 156-168. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1366605
Nudds, R.L. and Bryant, D.M. (2000) The Energetic Cost of Short Flights in Birds. Journal of Experimental Biology, 203, 1561-1572.
Rogers, D.I., Piersma, T. and Hassell, C.J. (2006) Roost Availability May Constrain Shorebird Distribution: Exploring the Energetic Costs of Roosting and Disturbance around a Tropical Bay. Biological Conservation, 133, 225-235. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2006.06.007
Schmidt-Wellenburg, C.A., Biebach, H., Daan, S. and Visser, G.H. (2007) Energy Expenditure and Wing Beat Frequency in Relation to Body Mass in Free Flying Barn Swallows (Hirundorustica). Journal of Comparative Physiology B, 177, 327-337. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00360-006-0132-5
Weber, J.M. (2009) The Physiology of Long-Distance Migration: Extending the Limits of Endurance Metabolism. Journal of Experimental Biology, 212, 593-597. http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jeb.015024
Gavrilov, V.M. (2011) Energy Expenditures for Flight, Aerodynamic Quality, and Colonization of Forest Habitats by Birds. The Biological Bulletin, 38, 779-788. http://dx.doi.org/10.1134/S1062359011080024
Piersma, T., Dekinga, A., Van Gils, J.A., Achterkamp, B. and Visser, G.H. (2003) Cost-Benefit Analysis of Mollusc Eating in a Shorebird. 1. Foraging and Processing Costs Estimated by the Doubly Labelled Water Method. Journal of Experimental Biology, 206, 3361-3368. http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/jeb.00545
Jacobs, S.R., Edwards, D.B., Ringrose, J., Elliott, K.H., Weber, J.M. and Gaston, A.J. (2011) Changes in Body Composition during Breeding: Reproductive Strategies of Three Species of Seabirds under Poor Environmental Conditions. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part B, 158, 77-82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpb.2010.09.011
Newton, I. (2010) Bird Migration. HarperCollins, London.
Furness, R.W. and Greenwood, J.J.D. (1993) Birds as Monitors of Environmental Change. Chapman & Hall, London. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-1322-7
Metcalfe, N.B. and Ure, S.E. (1995) Diurnal Variation in Flight Performance and Hence Potential Predation Risk in Small Birds. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 261, 395-400. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.1995.0165
Gienapp, P., Lof, M., Reed, T.E., McNamara, J., Verhulst, S. and Visser, M.E. (2013) Predicting Demographically Sustainable Rates of Adaptation: Can Great Tit Breeding Time Keep Pace with Climate Change? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 368, 1-10.
Forrester, R.W., Andrews, I.J., McInerny, C.J., Murray, R.D., McGowan, R.Y., Zonfrillo, B., et al. (2007) The Birds of Scotland. Scottish Ornithologists Club, Aberlady.
Newton, I. (1979) Population Ecology of Raptors. T & AD Poyser, Berkhamsted.
Arroyo, B., Leckie, F., Amar, A., Aspinall, D., McCluskie, A. and Redpath, S. (2004) Habitat Use and Range Management on Priority Areas for Hen Harriers: 2003 Report. CEH Project Number: C02018, NERC/Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, 31 p.
Arroyo, B.E., Leckie, F. and Redpath, S.M. (2006) Habitat Use and Range Management on Priority Areas for Hen Harriers: Final Report. CEH Report to SNH.
Arroyo, B., Amar, A., Leckie, F., Buchanan, G.M., Wilson, J.D. and Redpath, S. (2009) Hunting Habitat Selection by Hen Harriers on Moorland: Implications for Conservation Management. Biological Conservation, 142, 586-596. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2008.11.013
Amar, A., Arroyo, B.E., Redpath, S.M. and Thirgood, S. (2004) Habitat Predicts Losses of Red Grouse to Individual Hen Harriers. Journal of Applied Ecology, 41, 305-314. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-8901.2004.00890.x
Brown, L. (1976) British Birds of Prey. Collins, London.
Professor John O’Halloran, Personal Communication.
Haworth, P. and Fielding, A. (2014) A Review of the Impacts of Terrestrial Wind Farms on Breeding and Wintering Hen Harriers. Draft Report to Scottish Natural Heritage. Haworth Conservation, 34 p.
Band, W., Madders, M. and Whitfield, D.P. (2007) Developing Field and Analytical Methods to Assess Avian Collision Risk at Wind Farms. In: De Lucas, M., Janss, G. and Ferrer, M., Eds., Birds and Wind Power, Quercus Editions, Madrid, 259-275. www.quercus.pt
Hancock, M.H., Gibbons, D.W., Thompson, P.S. (1997) The Status of Breeding Greenshank (Tringanebularia) in the United Kingdom in 1995. Bird Study, 44, 290-302. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00063659709461064
Nethersole-Thompson, D. and Nethersole-Thompson, M. (1979) Greenshanks. T & AD Poyser, Berkhamsted.
Nethersole-Thompson, D. (1951) The Greenshank. Collins New Naturalist, London.
Hale, W.G. (1980) Waders. Collins New Naturalist, London.
Thompson, D.B.A., Thompson, P.S. and Nethersole-Thompson, D. (1986) Timing of Breeding and Breeding Performance in a Population of Greenshanks (Tringanebularia). Journal of Animal Ecology, 55, 181-199. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/4701
Pendlebury, C., Zisman, S., Walls, R., Sweeney, J., McLoughlin, E., Robinson, C., et al. (2011) Literature Review to Assess Bird Species Connectivity to Special Protection Areas. Scottish Natural Heritage Commissioned Report No. 390.
Alerstam, T., Rosen, M., Bäckman, J., Ericson, P.G.P. and Hellgren, O. (2007) Flight Speeds among Bird Species: Allometric and Phylogenetic Effects. PLoS Biology, 5, e197. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0050197
MacArthur Green (2016) Greenshank Collision Mortality Estimated Based on Ecological and Behavioural Studies. SNH Commissioned Research Report. (in press) http://www.snh.gov.uk/publications-data-and-research/publications/search-the-catalogue/