Optimization of Process Conditions for the Development of Tomato Foam by Box-Behnken Design
- 1 Principal Scientist, Central Institute of Agricultural Engineering, Bhopal-462 038, India
- 2 Central University, Pondicherry, Puducherry-605014, India
- 3 Central University, Pondicherry, Pudu-cherry-605014, India
- 4 Senior Scientist, Central Institute of Post-Harvest Engineering and Technology, Ludhiana-141 004, India
Abstract
The present work aims to optimize the foaming conditions for tomato juice using three level Box-Behnken Experimental Design of Response surface Methodology. In the following study three process parameters namely concentration of egg albumin (EA) as foaming agent, Carboxy methyl cellulose (CMC) as foam stabilizer and whipping time (WT) was optimized. The levels for various input variables were EA: 5% - 15%, CMC: 0.10% - 0.60% & WT: 3 - 7 min. The responses measured were expansion volume (EV), foam density (FD) and drainage volume (DV) which are an indication of foaming ability and foam stability. The predicted levels of responses as generated by software were EV: 91.49%, FD: 0.558 g/cc & DV: 10 ml, which on validation was found closer to experimental value.
- A. A. Abushita, E. A. Hebshi, H. G. Daood and P. A. Biacs, “Determination of Antioxidant Vitamins in Tomatoes,” Food Chemistry, Vol. 60, 1997, pp. 207-212. doi:10.1016/S0308-8146(96)00321-4
- S. K. Clinton, “Lycopene: Chemistry, Biology, and Implications for Human Health and Disease,” Nutrition Reviews, Vol. 56, No. 2, 1998, pp. 35-51. doi:10.1111/j.1753-4887.1998.tb01691.x
- D. M. Kadam and S. Balasubramanian, “Foam Mat Drying of Tomato Juice,” Journal of Food Process and Preservation, Vol. 35, No. 4, 2011, pp. 488-495. doi:10.1111/j.1745-4549.2010.00492.x
- C. Ratti and T. Kudra, “Drying of Foamed Biological Materials: Opportunities and Challenges,” Drying Technology, Vol. 24, No. 9, 2006, pp.1101-1108. doi:10.1080/07373930600778213
- P. Rajkumar, R. Kailappan, R. Vishwanathan and G. S. V. Raghavan, “Drying Characteristics of Foamed Alphonso Mango Pulp in a Continuous Type Foam Mat Drier,” Journal of Food Engineering, Vol. 79, No. 4, pp. 1452-1459. doi:10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2006.04.027
- S. K. Bag, P. P.Srivastav and H. N. Mishra, “Optimization of Process Parameters for Foaming of Bael (Aeglemarmelos L.) Fruit Pulp,” Food Bioprocess Technology, Vol. 4, No. 8, 2011, pp. 1450-1458. doi:10.1007/s11947-009-0243-6
- M. K. Carley, Y. N. Kamneva and J. Reminga, “Response Surface Methodology,” CASOS Technical Report, CMUISRI-04-136, 2004.
- F. Li, L. Yang, T. Zhao, J. Zou, Y. Zou and X. Wu, “Optimization of Enzymatic Pretreatment for n-Hexane Extraction of Oil from Silybummarianumseeds Using Response Surface Methodology,” Food Bioproducts Processing, Vol. 90, No. 2, 2012, pp. 87-94. doi:10.1016/j.fbp.2011.02.010
- Association of Official Analytical Chemists, “Methods 14.002 (Moisture),” Official Methods of Analysis, 13th Edition, Washington DC, 2000.
- D. J. Durian and D. A. Weitz, “Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology,” M. H. Grant, Ed., Wiley, New York, 1994, p. 783.
- R. L. Labelle, “Characterization of Foams for Foam Mat Drying,” Food Technology, Vol. 20, No. 8, 1966, pp. 10671070.
- E. A. Sauter and J. E. Montoure, “The Relationship of Lysosyme Content of Egg White to Volume and Stability of Foams,” Journal of Food Science, Vol. 37, No. 6, 1972, pp. 918-920. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2621.1972.tb03703.x
- E. del Castillo, “An Overview of Empirical Process Optimization,” Process Optimisation: A Statistical Approach, Springer Inc, New York, 2007.