Consumption Pattern of Energy Drinks by University of Ibadan Students and Associated Health Risks Factors
- 1 Department of Human Nutrition, Faculty of Public Health, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria
- 2 Department of Human Nutrition, Faculty of Public Health, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria
Abstract
Energy drinks are non alcoholic, carbonated beverages claimed to give extra burst of energy for daily obligation. They contain some form of legal stimulants and vitamins which are meant to give consumers short term boost in energy and increase mental alertness. Energy drinks enjoy patronage especially among higher institution students in Nigeria, but little is known about the consumption pattern and possible health risks to consumers. This study was carried out to determine the contribution of four commonly consumed energy drinks to energy intake of University of Ibadan students and the associated health risk factors. A descriptive cross-sectional survey of energy drinks consumption was carried out using a four-stage systematic random sampling technique to select 307 students from six out of nine halls of residence for Undergraduates and the two Postgraduate halls. A validated semi-structured, self-administered questionnaire was used to collect information on socio-demographic characteristics, consumption pattern and frequency, and factors influencing consumption of energy drinks. Samples of the four most commonly consumed energy drinks by the students (Power Horse, Emerge, Red Bull and Matador brands) were purchased from different stores within and around the University of Ibadan campus. Composite samples of all the four energy drinks (with at least six months expiration date) were analysed for physico- chemical characteristics, gross energy, minerals and B-vitamins content in triplicate using standard methods of AOAC. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and one way ANOVA, and level of significance set at p < 0.05. Respondents mean age was 23.1 ± 4.6 years, 79.2% were undergraduates and 51.1% were female. Majority (74.6%) of respondents had ever taken energy drinks prior to the study, 42.4% reported consuming at least one can in a week, and 52.1% consumed 1 can at a sitting. Reasons for consumption included to increase: energy (48.2%), mental alertness (18.6%) and athletic performance (9.5%). Reported side effects were: insomnia (14.0%), frequent urination (12.2%), dehydration (11.3%), anxiety (9.1%), heart palpitation (3.5%). Frequency of consumption was significantly associated with gender (p < 0.05). Titratable acidity, total solids and pH of energy drinks ranged between 7.57 ± 0.60 - 8.28 ± 0.08, 7.57 ± 0.60 - 11.42 ± 0.31, and 3.36 ± 0.08 - 3.81 ± 0.12 respectively. Glucose, sucrose, and gross energy content ranged between 7.77 ± 0.01 - 7.89 ± 0.01 g, 22.61 ± 0.07 - 23.74 ± 0.09 g, and 43.59 ± 0.38 - 48.89 ± 0.28 kcal/100g respectively. Few respondents knew about the ingredients and potential health risks associated with energy drink consumption. All the four drinks had acidic pH, hence nutrition education on reduction of energy drink consumption is needed among these students.
- Alford, C., Cox, H. and Wescott, R. (2001) The Effects of Red Bull Energy Drink on Human Performance and Mood. Amino Acids, 21, 139-150. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s007260170021
- Brian (2004) Energy Drinks: Ingredients & Dangers. CitynetMagazine.com, November 23rd, 2004.
- Salamon, M. (2011) Study: Alcohol-Energy Drink Combo Riskier than Booze Alone. USA Today. http://yourlife.usatoday.com/health/story/2011/04/Study-Alcohol-energy-drink-combo-riskier-than-booze-alone
- Warburton, D.M., Bersellini, E. and Sweeney, E. (2001) An Evaluation of a Caffeinated Taurine Drink on Mood, Memory and Information Processing in Healthy Volunteers without Caffeine Abstinence. Psychopharmacology, 158, 322-328. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s002130100884
- Smith, H.J., Cotton, J.R., Hughes, S.C. and Rogers, P.J. (2004) Mood and Cognitive Performance Effects of Energy Drink Constituents: Caffeine, Glucose and Carbonation. Nutritional Neuroscience, 7, 127-139. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10284150400003041
- Bevnet (2007) Beverage Reviews. www.bevnet.com/reviews/categories.asp
- Higgins, J.P., Tuttle, T.D. and Higgins, C.L. (2010) Energy Beverages: Content and Safety. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 85, 1033-1041. http://dx.doi.org/10.4065/mcp.2010.0381
- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, U.S. Department of Agriculture (2007) Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2005. www.healthierus.gov/dietaryguidelines/
- Egger, G. and Swinburn, B. (1997) An Ecological Approach to the Obesity Pandemic. British Medical Journal, 315, 477-480. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.315.7106.477
- Bray, G.A., Nielsen, S.J. and Popkin, B.M. (2004) Consumption of High-Fructose Corn Syrup in Beverages May Play a Role in the Epidemic of Obesity. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 79, 537-543.
- West, N.X., Hughes, J.A. and Addy, M. (2000) Erosion of Dentin and Enamel in Vitro by Dietary Acids: The Effect of Temperature, Acid Character, Concentration and Exposure Time. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, 27, 875-880. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2000.00583.x
- AOAC (2005) Official Methods of Analysis of Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Garthersburg, Washington DC.
- Essien, A.I., Ebana, R.U.B. and Udo, H.B. (1992) Chemical Evaluation of Pod and Pulp of the Fluted Pumpkin (Telfaira occidentalis) Fruit. Food Chemistry, 45, 175-178. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0308-8146(92)90110-N