Teaching New Mothers about Infant Feeding Cues May Increase Breastfeeding Duration
- 1
- 2
- 3
Abstract
The objective of this pilot study was to compare two different methods of educating prenatal women regarding breast-feeding. Comparisons were made between traditional and innovative methods to determine which was more effective in increasing breastfeeding duration. Over a 32 month period, 197 prenatal women were assigned to either a control (C, n = 139) or an experimental (E, n = 51) group. The C group received standard breastfeeding education, while the E group received standard education in addition to information about infant hunger cues. Cox Regression and Kap-lan- Meier analysis were performed. Estimated mean number of weeks for C and E groups to continue breastfeeding was 14.3 + 17.4 weeks and 18.5 + 17.1 weeks, respectively. At 26 weeks, duration of breastfeeding approached significance (chi square = 2.907, df = 1, p = 0.088), indicating probability of continuing to breastfeed was about 28% better for those in E group when compared to C group. Duration of breastfeeding may increase when prenatal women are taught to identify infant behavior such as hunger cues.
- American Academy of Pediatrics, “Poicy Statement: Breastfeeding and the Use of Human Milk,” Pediatrics, Vol. 115, No. 2, 2005, pp. 496-506. doi:10.1542/peds.2004-2491
- American Dietetic Association, “Position of the American Dietetic Association: Promoting and Supporting Breastfeeding,” Journal of the American Dietetic Association, Vol. 105, No. 5, 2009, pp. 810-818.
- World Health Organization, “Global Strategy for Infant and Young Child Feeding,” World Health Organization, Geneva, 2003.
- United States Department of Health and Human Services, “Healthy People 2010: Conference Edition: Volumes I and II,” US Department of Health and Human Services, Washington DC, 2010.
- K. Hurley, et al., “Variation in Breastfeeding Behaviours, Perceptions, and Experiences by Race Ethnicity among a Low-Income Statewide Sample of Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (W- IC) Partipants in the United States,” Maternal and Child Nutrition, Vol. 4, No. 2, 2008, pp. 95-105. doi:10.1111/j.1740-8709.2007.00105.x
- United States Department of Agriculture, “Women, Infants, and Children,” 2010. http://www.fns.usda.gov/wic/
- J. Weimer, “The Economical Cost of Breastfeeding: A Review and an Analysis,” US Department of Agriculture, Washington DC, 2001.
- G. Balaban, et al., “Early Weaning and Other Potential Risk Factors for Overweight among Preschool Children,” Clinics, Vol. 65, No. 2, 2010, pp. 181-187. doi:10.1590/S1807-59322010000200010
- M. S. Kramer, et al., “Health and Development Outcomes in 6.5 yr-Old Children Breastfed Exclusively for 3 to 6 Months,” American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol. 90, No. 4, 2009, pp. 1070-1074. doi:10.3945/ajcn.2009.28021
- A. M. Stuebe and E. B. Schwartz, “The Risks and Benefits of Infant Feeding Practices for Women and Their Children,” Journal of Perinatology, Vol. 30, No. 3, 2010, pp. 155-162. doi:10.1038/jp.2009.107
- Ross Products Division, Abbott Laboratories, “The Mothers Survey,” Ross Products Division, Abbott Laboratories, 2000, pp. 1-12.
- B. J. Schwartz, et al., “Does WIC Participation Improve Breastfeeding Practices?” American Journal of Public Heal- th, Vol. 85, No. 5, 2005, pp. 727-731.
- M. L. Overfield, et al., “Clinical Guidelines for the Establishment of Exclusive Breastfeeding,” 2005. http://www.ilca.org/files/resources/ClinicalGuidelines2005.pdf