Creatine HCl and Creatine Monohydrate Improve Strength but Only Creatine HCl Induced Changes on Body Composition in Recreational Weightlifters
- 1 University São Judas Tadeu, São Paulo, Brazil
- 2 University São Judas Tadeu, São Paulo, Brazil
- 3 University São Judas Tadeu, São Paulo, Brazil
- 4 University São Judas Tadeu, São Paulo, Brazil
- 5 University São Judas Tadeu, São Paulo, Brazil
- 6 University São Judas Tadeu, São Paulo, Brazil
- 7 University São Judas Tadeu, São Paulo, Brazil
- 8 Exercise and Immunometabolism Research Group, Department of Physical Education, Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Presidente Prudente, Brazil
- 9 Exercise and Immunometabolism Research Group, Department of Physical Education, Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Presidente Prudente, Brazil
- 10 Faculty of Physical Education, University of Campinas (FEF/Unicamp), Campinas, Brazil
- 11 University Presbiteriana Mackenzie, São Paulo, Brazil
Abstract
Background: Creatine supplementation is a subject that is very well studied. New forms of creatine are suggesting improvements in this supplement performance. Creatine HCl is supposed to have better solubility and absorption than creatine. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of two different doses of creatine HCl with creatine monohydrate on the strength and body composition in recreational weightlifters and to verify the relationship between strength and body composition. Methods: 40 subjects were divided in four groups: Creatine Monohydrate (CMG) 5 g/daily; Creatine HCl-1 (HCl-1) 5 g/daily, Creatine HCl-2 (HCl-2) 1.5 g/daily and Control group (CG) = 5 g of resistant starch/daily. All groups performed a resistance training program during 4 weeks. Body composition and strength were evaluated pre and post intervention. Results: The 1 RM at the Leg press was increased significantly in all groups (CMG: pre = 264.4 ± 83.8 × post = 298.1 ± 90.9; HCl-1: pre = 295.0 ± 88.3 × post = 338.3 ± 86.8 and HCl-2: pre = 274.3 ± 57.1 × post = 305.7 ± 59.4; p < 0.05), Bench press 1 RM was increased significantly only in HCl-2 (pre = 72.4 ± 25.7 × post = 76.0 ± 25.0; p = 0.003), however, there was no statistically significant difference between groups. Fatmass was significantly decreased in HCl-1 (pre = 14.5 ± 8.0 × post = 13.3 ± 8.3; p = 0.034) and HCl-2 (pre = 13.8 ± 5.8 × post = 12.7 ± 5.6; p = 0.005) but fat-free mass was increased only in HCl-1 (pre = 52.2 ± 8.9 × post = 53.8 ± 8.9; p = 0.031), with no differences between groups again. We observed strong correlations between upper limb strength and fat mass (r = 0.93, p < 0.05), and between lower limb strength and FFM (r = 0.93, p < 0.05) only in HCl-1 group. Conclusions: We concluded that creatine HCl and creatine Monohydrate improve performance but only creatine HCl induces changes on body composition in recreational weightlifters with differences between creatine HCl doses.
- Terjung, R.L., Clarkson, P., Eichner, E.R., Greenhaff, P.L., Heel, P.J., Israel, R.G., Kraemer, W.J., Meyer, R., Ariet, L.L., Tarnopolsky, M.A., Wagenmakers, A.J. and Williams, M.H. (2000) American College of orts Medicine Roundtable: The Physiological and Health Effects of Oral Creatine Supplementation. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 32, 706-717.
- Lanhers, C., Pereira, B., Naughton, G., Trousselard, M., Lesage, F.X. and Dutheil, F. (2015) Creatine Supplementation and Lower Limb Strength Performance: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses. Sports Medicine, 45, 1285-1294. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40279-015-0337-4
- Groeneveld, G.J., Beijer, C., Veldink, J.H., Kalmijn, S., Wokke, J.H. and Vandenberg, L.H. (2005) Few Adverse Effects of Long-Term Creatine Supplementation in a Placebo-Controlled Trial. International Journal of Sports Medicine, 26, 307-313.
- Benzi, G. (2000) Is There a Rationale for the Use of Creatine Either as Nutritional Supplementation or Drug Administration in Humans Participating in a ort? Pharmacological Research, 41, 255-264. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/phrs.1999.0618
- Graham, A.S. and Hatton, R.C. (1999) Creatine: A Review of Efficacy and Safety. Journal of the American Pharmaceutical Association (Wash), 39, 803-810, quiz 875-877.
- Ostojic, S.M. and Ahmetovic, Z. (2008) Gastrointestinal Distress after Creatine Supplementation in Athletes: Are Side Effects Dose Dependent? Research in Sports Medicine, 16, 15-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15438620701693280
- Dash, A.K., Miller, D.W., Huai-Yan, H., Carnazzo, J. and Stout, J.R. (2001) Evaluation of Creatine Transport Using Caco-2 Monolayers as an in Vitro Model for Intestinal Absorption. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 90, 1593-1598. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jps.1109
- Gufford, B.T., Sriraghavan, K., Miller, N.J., Miller, D.W., Gu, X., Vennerstrom, J.L. and Robinson, D. (2010) Physicochemical Characterization of Creatine N-Methylguanidinium Salts. Journal of Dietary Supplements, 7, 240-252. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/19390211.2010.491507
- Gufford, B.T., Ezell, E.L., Robinson, D.H., Miller, D.W., Miller, N.J., Gu, X. and Vennerstrom, J.L. (2013) Dependent Stability of Creatine Ethyl Ester: Relevance to Oral Absorption. Journal of Dietary Supplements, 10, 241-251. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/19390211.2013.822453
- Lohman, T.G. (1986) Applicability of Body Composition Techniques and Constants for Children and Youths. Exercise & Sport Sciences Reviews, 14, 325-357. http://dx.doi.org/10.1249/00003677-198600140-00014