Influence of Variety and Maturity Level on Natural Convective Heat Drying of Four Onion Varieties Grown in Senegal
- 1 Laboratoire d’Electrochimie et de Procédés Membranaires (LEPM), ESP-UCAD, Dakar, Sénégal
- 2 Centre d’Etudes sur la Sécurité alimentaire et les Molécules fonctionnelles (CESAM-RESCIF), ESP-UCAD, Dakar, Sénégal
- 3 Centre d’Etudes sur la Sécurité alimentaire et les Molécules fonctionnelles (CESAM-RESCIF), ESP-UCAD, Dakar, Sénégal
- 4 Institut Pasteur de Dakar, Unité d’épidémiologie des maladies infectieuses, Dakar, Sénégal
- 5 Laboratoire des Sciences Biologiques, Agronomiques et de Modélisation des Systèmes Complexes (LaBAM)/UGB, Saint-Louis, Sénégal
- 6 Laboratoire d’Electrochimie et de Procédés Membranaires (LEPM), ESP-UCAD, Dakar, Sénégal
Abstract
The considerable post-harvest losses (5% to 40% depending on storage time) due to the high water content level of the onion varieties in Senegal are the main cause of the problem of access to local onion all year round. Therefore, drying is one of the techniques that can be used to solve the problem of onion perishability. This study deals with the characterization of naturally convective kinetics drying of four onion varieties in relation to their maturity level. The experiment was carried out using the gravimetric method. The Welch and Turkey statistical tests display a significant difference between the effective diffusivity coefficients depending on the maturity level within each variety and across the four varieties. The effective diffusivity coefficients of the Galmi Violet, Safari, Gandiol F1 and Orient F1varieties range from 2.18 × 10 − 11 ± 2.69 × 10 − 12 to 1.32 × 10 − 10 ± 1.17 × 10 − 11 m 2 ⋅ s − 1 at a maturity level less than 80%. When the maturity level is greater than 85%, the effective diffusivity coefficients range from 1.30 × 10 − 11 ± 1.24 × 10 − 12 to 8.05 × 10 − 11 ± 8.94 × 10 − 13 m 2 ⋅ s − 1 . As far as the activation energy is concerned, the study only reveals a significant difference between the varieties whatever the maturity level is. The Galmi Violet variety stands out with an average activation energy of 66.71 ± 0.12 KJ ⋅ mol − 1 K − 1 for the maturity level below 80% and 58.74 ± 0.11 KJ ⋅ mol − 1 for the maturity level above 85%. For the three remaining varieties, the average activation energy ranges from 58.15 ± 0.19 to 59.12 ± 0.13 KJ ⋅ mol − 1 for a maturity level less than 80% whereas the rates go from 47.63 ± 0.28 to 49.96 ± 0.77 KJ ⋅ mol − 1 when the maturity level is greater than 85%. In summary, the higher the maturity level is, the lower the effective diffusivity coefficients will be. The same tendency was observed with the activation energy. The Galmi Violet variety represents the limitative one in case of the drying of the four varieties mix together.
- FAOSTAT (2016) Food and Agriculture Organization Corporate Statistical Database (FAOSTAT). http://www.fao.org/faostat/fr/#country/195
- Albitar, N., Mounir, S., Besombes, C. and Allaf, K. (2011) Improving the Drying of Onion Using the Instant Controlled Pressure Drop Technology. Drying Technology, 29, 993-1001. https://doi.org/10.1080/07373937.2010.507912
- CIQUAL (2017) Ciqual Table de Composition Nutritionnelle des Aliments. https://ciqual.anses.fr/
- Krokida, M.K., Karathanos, V.T., Maroulis, Z.B. and Marinos-Kouris, D. (2003) Drying Kinetics of Some Vegetables. Journal of Food Engineering, 59, 391-403. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0260-8774(02)00498-3
- Babalis, S.J. and Belessiotis, V.G. (2004) Influence of the Drying Conditions on the Drying Constants and Moisture Diffusivity during the Thin-Layer Drying of Figs. Journal of Food Engineering, 65, 449-458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2004.02.005
- Bonazzi, C., Dumoulin, E. and Bimbenet, J.J. (2008) Le séchage des produits alimentaires. Industries Alimentaires et Agricoles, 125, 12-22.
- Jeantet, R., Croguennec, T., Schuck, P. and Brulé, G. (2008) Sciences des Aliments 1 Stabilisation biologique et physico-chimique. 13-19, 233-244.
- Clemente, G., Frías, A., Sanjuan, N., Benedito, J. and Mulet, A. (2011) Influence of Air Velocity in Dehydration of Potato Cubes. III European Drying Conference, Palma de Mallorca, 26-28 October 2011, 26-28.
- Doymaz, I. (2010) Evaluation of Mathematical Models for Prediction of Thin-Layer Drying of Banana Slices. International Journal of Food Properties, 13, 486-497. https://doi.org/10.1080/10942910802650424
- Brooks, M.S., El-Hana, N.A. and Ghaly, A.E. (2008) Effects of Tomato Geometries and Air Temperature on the Drying Behavior of Plum Tomato. American Journal of Applied Sciences, 5, 1369-1375. https://doi.org/10.3844/ajassp.2008.1369.1375
- Madamba, P.S., Driscoll, R.H. and Buckle, K.A. (1996) The Thin-Layer Drying Characteristics of Garlic Slices. Journal of Food Engineering, 29, 75-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/0260-8774(95)00062-3
- Sarsavadia, P.N., Sawhney, R.L., Pangavhane, D.R. and Singh, S.P. (1999) Drying Behaviour of Brined Onion Slices. Journal of Food Engineering, 40, 219-226. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0260-8774(99)00058-8
- Kiranoudis, C.T., Maroulis, Z.B. and Marinos-Kouris, D. (1992) Drying Kinetics of Onion and Green Pepper. Drying Technology, 10, 995-1011. https://doi.org/10.1080/07373939208916492