Glycemic Index and Response of a Plant Based Nutritional Supplement and Its Subjective Satiety Following Its Use in Indian Adults
- 1 Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories, Hyderabad, India
- 2 Department of Foods, Nutrition & Dietetics Research, Madras Diabetes Research Foundation, Chennai, India
- 3 Department of Foods, Nutrition & Dietetics Research, Madras Diabetes Research Foundation, Chennai, India
- 4 Department of Foods, Nutrition & Dietetics Research, Madras Diabetes Research Foundation, Chennai, India
- 5 Department of Foods, Nutrition & Dietetics Research, Madras Diabetes Research Foundation, Chennai, India
- 6 Department of Foods, Nutrition & Dietetics Research, Madras Diabetes Research Foundation, Chennai, India
- 7 Department of Foods, Nutrition & Dietetics Research, Madras Diabetes Research Foundation, Chennai, India
- 8 Department of Foods, Nutrition & Dietetics Research, Madras Diabetes Research Foundation, Chennai, India
- 9 Department of Foods, Nutrition & Dietetics Research, Madras Diabetes Research Foundation, Chennai, India
- 10 Department of Diabetology, Dr. Mohan’s Diabetes Specialities Centre, Chennai, India
- 11 Department of Diabetology, Dr. Mohan’s Diabetes Specialities Centre, Chennai, India
- 12 Department of Foods, Nutrition & Dietetics Research, Madras Diabetes Research Foundation, Chennai, India
- 13 Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories, Hyderabad, India
- 14 Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories, Hyderabad, India
- 15 Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories, Hyderabad, India
- 16 Department of Diabetology, Dr. Mohan’s Diabetes Specialities Centre, Chennai, India
Abstract
Background: Diet plays a vital role in managing diabetes. Foods with a low glycemic index provide lower postprandial glucose spikes and induce satiety. The objective of this study was to assess the Glycemic index (GI) without milk and Glycemic response (GR) with milk of two different flavours of a plant - based supplement which is high in protein and fibre, along with a subjective assessment of satiety. Methods: Fifteen overweight/obese subjects aged 18 - 45 years were recruited. After overnight fasting, blood samples were drawn at 5 mins before food consumption ( - 5), 0, 15, 30, 45, 60, 90 and 120 minutes. Participants underwent 3 days of reference food testing and 1 day of test food in random order with 2 days of wash - out period. The GI was assessed using a validated protocol recognized by FAO/WHO, as well as the guidelines by the International Dietary Carbohydrate Task Force for GI Methodology. The s atiety index was measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The dietary intake of the subjects was measured by 24 - hour dietary recall. The Incremental Area Under the Curve (IAUC) was calculated using the trapezoid rule. Results: Both the flavours of the supplement had low GI & GR. The GI and GR of Flavour 1 were 27.3 ± 4.8 & 16.4 ± 2.6 (Mean ± SEM) respectively. For Flavour 2 the GI and GR were 36.7 ± 4.4 & 25.7 ± 2.3 (Mean ± SEM). For Flavour 1, 60% and for flavour 2 66.7% of subjects reported feeling hungry only after 3 hours, showing good satiety. Conclusion: The plant - based high fibre high protein supplement in both flavours showed a low glycemic index and hence may be useful to include in the diets to reduce the postprandial glycemic response and could improve satiety.
- Steinberger, J. and Daniels, S.R. (2003) Obesity, Insulin Resistance, Diabetes, and Cardiovascular Risk in Children: An American Heart Association Scientific Statement from the Atherosclerosis, Hypertension, and Obesity in the Young Committee (Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young) and the Diabetes Committee (Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism). Circulation, 107, 1448-1453. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000060923.07573.F2
- Hensrud, D. (2001) Dietary Treatment and Long-Term Weight Loss and Maintenance in Type 2 Diabetes. Obesity Research, 9, 348S-353S. https://doi.org/10.1038/oby.2001.141
- Anjana, R.M., Deepa, M., Pradeepa, R., Mahanta, J., Narain, K., Das, H.K., et al. (2017) Prevalence of Diabetes and Prediabetes in 15 States of INDIA: Results from the ICMR-INDIAB Population-Based Cross-Sectional Study. The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology, 5, 585-596.
- Evert, A.B., Boucher, J.L. Cypress, M., Dunbar, S.A., Franz, M.J., Mayer-Davis, E.J., et al. (2013) Nutrition Therapy Recommendations for the Management of Adults with Diabetes. Diabetes Care, 36, 3821-3842.
- Martin, C.L., Murphy, S.P. and Au, D.L.M. (2008) Compiling Glycemic Index and Glycemic Load Values for Addition to a Food Composition Database. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, 21, 469-473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2008.03.007
- Wolever, T.M., Vorster, H.H., Björck, I., Brand-Miller, J., Brighenti, F., Mann, J.I., Ramdath, D.D., Granfeldt, Y., Holt, S., Perry, T.L., Venter, C. and Wu, X.-M. (2003) Determination of the Glycaemic Index of Foods: Interlaboratory Study. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 57, 475-482. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601551
- Aller, E.E.J.G., Abete. I., Astrup, A., Martinez, J.A. and van Baak, M.A. (2011) Starches, Sugars and Obesity. Nutrients, 3, 341-369. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu3030341
- Chambers, L., McCrickerd, K. and Yeomans, M.R. (2015) Optimising Foods for Safety. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 41, 149-160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2014.10.007
- Guidelines for Use of Nutrition and Health Claims (CAC/Gl 23-1997).
- FAO (1998) Carbohydrates in Human Nutrition. Report of a Joint FAO/WHO Expert Consultation. FAO Food and Nutrition Paper, 66, 1-140.
- International Standards Organisation (2010) ISO 26642-2010: Food Products: Determination of the Glycaemic Index (GI) and Recommendation for Food Classification.