Calibrating Hydraulic Conductivity Estimation Methods for Typical Swedish Tills Used as Core Materials
- 1 RQV Teknik AB, Hudiksvall, Sweden
Abstract
Empirical hydraulic-conductivity equations are widely used in geotechnical engineering, but none were developed specifically for the low-permeability glacial tills commonly used as core and seepage-control materials. This study evaluates and calibrates empirical conductivity equations for a dataset of 26 till materials from 10 source groups, including one Finnish source group represented by six materials. The main contribution is practical. Based on till-only screening supported by a broader multi-material comparison, the study identifies the Beyer method as the best-performing gradation-based method and the Slichter method as the best-performing porosity-dependent alternative. To adapt further for typical Swedish tills, Beyer showed little benefit from recalibration, whereas Slichter showed clearer improvement from coefficient adjustment. Gradation-based methods implicitly assume a representative packing state, whereas porosity-dependent methods explicitly account for porosity. This study also provides simple practitioner aids for estimating D 10 and porosity when direct material data are incomplete, for example, when sedimentation analysis or density determinations are missing. The results show that classical equations can support conductivity estimation for typical non-plastic glacial tills, but applicability remains strongly controlled by till domain, data envelope, and method class.
- Fell, R., MacGregor, P., Stapledon, D., Bell, G. and Foster, M. (2015) Geotechnical Engineering of Dams. 2nd Edition, CRC Press.
- Cedergren, H.R. (1989) Seepage, Drainage, and Flow Nets. 3rd Edition, Wiley.
- Wenzel, L.K. (1942) Methods for Determining Permeability of Water-Bearing Materials. U.S. Geological Survey Water-Supply Paper 887.
- Hazen, A. (1892) Some Physical Properties of Sands and Gravels, with Special Reference to Their Use in Filtration. In: 24 th Annual Report , Massachusetts State Board of Health, 539-556.
- Slichter, C.S. (1899) Theoretical Investigation of the Motion of Ground Waters. U.S. Geological Survey, 19th Annual Report, Part II.
- Kozeny, J. (1927) Über kapillare Leitung des Wassers im Boden. Sitzungsberichte der Akademie der Wissenschaften in Wien , 136, 271-306.
- Carman, P.C. (1937) Fluid Flow through Granular Beds. Transactions of the Institution of Chemical Engineers , 15, 150-166.
- Beyer, W. (1964) Zur Bestimmung der Wasserdurchlässigkeit von Kiesen und Sanden aus der Kornverteilungskurve. Wasserwirtschaft - Wassertechnik , 14, 165-169.
- Shepherd, R.G. (1989) Correlations of Permeability and Grain Size. Groundwater , 27, 633-638. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6584.1989.tb00476.x
- Alyamani, M.S. and Şen, Z. (1993) Determination of Hydraulic Conductivity from Complete Grain‐Size Distribution Curves. Groundwater , 31, 551-555. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6584.1993.tb00587.x
- Chapuis, R.P. (2004) Predicting the Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity of Soils: A Review. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment , 63, 291-298.
- Odong, J. (2007) Evaluation of Empirical Formulae for Determination of Hydraulic Conductivity Based on Grain-Size Analysis. Journal of American Science , 3, 54-60.
- Wang, J.P., François, B. and Lambert, P. (2017) Equations for Hydraulic Conductivity Estimation from Particle Size Distribution: A Dimensional Analysis. Water Resources Research , 53, 8127-8134. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017wr020888
- Urumović, K., Borović, S., Urumović, K. and Navratil, D. (2020) Validity Range and Reliability of the United States Bureau of Reclamation (USBR) Method in Hydrogeological Investigations. Hydrogeology Journal , 28, 625-636. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-019-02080-2