Optimization of <i>Jatropha</i> Biodiesel Production by Response Surface Methodology — Oak Academic Publishing
Research ArticleOpen AccessGoogle Scholar indexed
Optimization of <i>Jatropha</i> Biodiesel Production by Response Surface Methodology
Chemical and Environmental Engineering Department, School of Engineering, RMIT University, Victoria, Australia
,
Bioenvironmental Engineering Research Centre (BERC), Department of Biotechnology Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, International Islamic University Malaysia, Jalan Gombak, Kuala Lumpur. Malaysia
,
Bioenvironmental Engineering Research Centre (BERC), Department of Biotechnology Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, International Islamic University Malaysia, Jalan Gombak, Kuala Lumpur. Malaysia
,
International Institute for Halal Research and Training (INHART) (IIUM), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
1 Chemical and Environmental Engineering Department, School of Engineering, RMIT University, Victoria, Australia
2 Bioenvironmental Engineering Research Centre (BERC), Department of Biotechnology Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, International Islamic University Malaysia, Jalan Gombak, Kuala Lumpur. Malaysia
3 Bioenvironmental Engineering Research Centre (BERC), Department of Biotechnology Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, International Islamic University Malaysia, Jalan Gombak, Kuala Lumpur. Malaysia
4 International Institute for Halal Research and Training (INHART) (IIUM), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Cost of biodiesel is primarily because of factors such as the feedstock, production process and materials. Apparently, the final biodiesel product is a bit expensive compared to fossil diesel fuel. While non-food feedstock of high oil content such as Jatropha curcas has been proposed to reduce the cost due to the feedstock, a promising two-step approach of hydro-esterification can possibly offset the production cost for oil resource with high free fatty acids. Most importantly, optimization of the materials and process is expected to reduce wastage, enhance product purity and generate less wastewater. However, optimizing product generation has been dauntingly elusive because several parameters are needed to be considered holistically. In this study, Response Surface Methodology (RSM) was employed to optimize the yield and conversion of Jatropha biodiesel from J . curcas hydrolysate. An optimum Yield and conversion of 96% was achieved for both responses with an optimum temperature value of 60 ° C, 4 wt% for catalyst loading for 6 hrs reaction time. Findings imply that optimization study of Jatropha curcas hydrolysate for yield and conversion of fatty acid methyl esters using face centered central composite design of Design Expert 6.0.8 can ensure purity of product, conserve energy and reduce waste generation providing a significant frontier in biodiesel pricing.
Martini, N. and Schell, S. (1998) Plant oil as Fuels: Present State of Future Developments. In: Proceedings of the Synopsis, Springer, Berlin, 6. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-72269-1
Antolin, G., Tinaut, F., Briceno, Y., Castano, V., Perez, C. and Ramirez, A. (2002) Optimization of Biodiesel Production by Sunflower Oil Transesterification. Bioresource Technology, 83, 111-114. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(01)00200-0
Vicente, G., Martinez, M. and Aracil, J. (2004) Integrated Biodiesel Production: A Comparison of Different Homogeneous Catalyst Systems. Bioresource Technology, 92, 297-305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2003.08.014
Hoda, H., Mandana, A. and Farshad, Y. (2015) Optimization of Biodiesel Production from the Waste Cooking Oil Using Response Surface Methodology. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 94, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2014.12.005
Demirbas, A. (2008) Biodiesel: A Realistic Fuel Alternative for Diesel Engine. Springer, Berlin.
Singh, V., Lyubov, B., Bhaskar, S. and Yogesh, C.S. (2018) Biodiesel Production Using a Novel Heterogeneous Catalyst, Magnesium Zirconate (Mg2Zr5O12): Process Optimization through Response Surface Methodology (RSM). Energy Conversion and Management, 174, 198-207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2018.08.029
Nguyen, H.C., Shih-Hsiang, L., Shang, S.C., Chia, H.S., Jhih-Huei, L. and Chien-Chung, C. (2018) Enzymatic Production of Biodiesel from Insect Fat Using Methyl Acetate as an Acyl Acceptor: Optimization by Using Response Surface Methodology. Energy Conversion and Management, 158, 168-175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2017.12.068
Demirbas, A. (2005) Biodiesel Production from Vegetable Oils via Catalytic and Non-Catalytic Supercritical Methanol Transesterification Methods. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 31, 466-487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2005.09.001
Hojjat, M., Nayebzadeh, H., Khadangi-Mahrood, M. and Rahmani-Vahid, B. (2017) Optimization of Process Conditions for Biodiesel Production over CaO-Al2O3/ZrO2 Catalyst Using Response Surface Methodology. Chemical Papers, 71, 689-698. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11696-016-0096-1
Athar, M., Zaidi, S. and Hassan, S.Z. (2020) Intensification and Optimization of Biodiesel Production Using Microwave-Assisted Acid-Organo Catalyzed Transesterification Process. Scientific Reports, 10, 212-239. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-77798-1
Ajala, E.O., Aberuagba, F., Olaniyan, A.M., Ajala, M.A. and Sunmonu, M.O. (2017) Optimization of a Two-Stage Process for Biodiesel Production from Shea Butter Using Response Surface Methodology. Egyptian Journal of Petroleum, 26, 943-955. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpe.2016.11.005
Aranda, D.A.G., da Silva, C.C.C. and Detoni, C. (2009) Current Processes in Brazilian Biodiesel Production. International Review of Chemical Engineering, 1, 603-608.
Bender, M. (1999) Economic Feasibility Review for Community-Scale Farmer Cooperatives for Biodiesel. Bioresource Technology, 70, 81-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(99)00009-7
Demirbas, A. (2003) Biodiesel Fuels from Vegetable Oils via Catalytic and Non-Catalytic Supercritical Alcohol Transesterifications and Other Methods: A Survey. Energy Conversion and Management, 44, 2093-2109. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0196-8904(02)00234-0
Jongschaap, R.E.E., Corré, W.J., Bindraban, P.S. and Brandenburg, W.A. (2007) Claim and Facts on Jatropha curcas L. Plant Research International, B.V., Wageningen.
King, A., He, W., Cuevas, J., Freudenberger, M., Ramiaramanana, D. and Graham, I. (2009) Potential of Jatropha curcas as a Source of Renewable Oil and Animal Feed. Journal of Experimental Botany, 60, 2897-2905. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erp025
Divakara, B.N., Upadhyaya, H.D., Wani, S.P. and Gowda, C.L.L. (2010) Biology and Genetic Improvement of Jatropha curcas L.: A Review. Applied Energy, 87, 732-742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2009.07.013
Wardana, I.N.G. (2010) Combustion Characteristics of Jatropha Oil Droplet at Various Oil Temperatures. Fuel, 89, 659-664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2009.07.002
Kamil, M., Nik, R., Yusup, S. and Umer, R. (2011) Optimization of Polyol Ester Production by Tranesterfication of Jatropha-Based Methyl Ester with Trimethylolpropane Using Taguchi Design Experiment. Fuel, 90, 2343-2345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2011.02.018
Krishnamurthy, K.N., Sridhara, S.N. and Ananda Kumar, C.S. (2018) Synthesis and Optimization of Hydnocarpus wightiana and Dairy Waste Scum as Feed Stock for Biodiesel Production by Using Response Surface Methodology. Energy, 153, 1073-1086. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.04.068
Kabbashi, N.A., Mohammed, N.I., Alam, M.Z. and Mirghani, M.E.S. (2015) Hydrolysis of Jatropha curcas Oil for Biodiesel Synthesis Using Immobilized Candida Cylindracea Lipase. Journal of Molecular Catalysis B: Enzymatic, 116, 95-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcatb.2015.03.009
Mohammed, N.I., Kabbashi, N.A., Alam, M.Z. and Mirghani, M.E.S. (2016) Esterification of Jatropha curcas Hydrolysate Using Powdered Niobic Acid Catalyst. Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers, 63, 243-249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtice.2016.03.007
Stat-Ease (2002) Design Expert, Version 6.0.8. Stat-Ease Inc., East Hennepin Avenue. http://www.statease.com
Mohammad, A., Mohammad, G.R. and Nanjappa, A. (2018) Production Optimization and Quality Assessment of Papaya (Carica papaya) Biodiesel with Response Surface Methodology. Energy Conversion and Management, 156, 103-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2017.11.004
Dharma, S., Masjuki, H.H., Hwai, C.O., Sebayang, A.H., Silitonga, A.S., Kusumo, F. and Mahia, T.M.I. (2016) Optimization of Biodiesel Production Process for Mixed Jatropha curcas-Ceiba pentandra Biodiesel Using Response Surface Methodology. Energy Conversion and Management, 115, 178-190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2016.02.034
Montgomery, D.C. (2005) Design and Analysis of Experiments 13, 35, 164, 247, 286. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken.
Meher, L., Dharmagadda, V. and Naik, S. (2006) Optimization of Alkali-Catalyzed Transesterification of Pongamia pinnata Oil for Production of Biodiesel. Bioresource Technology, 97, 1392-1397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2005.07.003
Van Gerpen, J. and Canakci, M. (2001) Biodiesel Production from Oils and Fats with High Free Fatty Acids. Transactions of the ASAE, 44, 1429-1436. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.7010
Ramadhas, A.S., Jayraj, S. and Muraleedharan, C. (2005) Biodiesel Production from High FFA Rubber Seed Oil. Fuel, 84, 335-340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2004.09.016
Karmee, S.K., Patria, R.D. and Ki Lin, C.S. (2015) Techno-Economic Evaluation of Biodiesel Production from Waste Cooking Oil—A Case Study of Hong Kong. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 16, 4362-4371. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms16034362
Mohammed, N.I., Kabbashi, N.A., Alam, Md.Z. and Mirghani, M.E.S. (2014) Jatropha curcas Oil Characterization and Its Significance for Feedstock Selection in Biodiesel Production. IPCBEE, 65, 57-62.