DEEP SEE™—A Seven-Step Framework for Deeper, Bias-Aware Root Cause Analysis in Healthcare
- 1 Alhammadi Hospitals Group, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
Abstract
Root Cause Analysis (RCA) remains the primary investigative tool for adverse events in healthcare, yet its limitations are increasingly recognised. Many analyses fail to account for cognitive biases, cultural influences, and complex system interdependencies, resulting in incomplete learning and weak corrective actions. This paper introduces DEEP SEE™, a seven-step framework designed to move beyond linear cause-and-effect thinking. By guiding investigators from surface-level descriptions to deeper cultural and contextual insights, DEEP SEE™ supports richer understanding and more actionable recommendations. The model is illustrated through eight representative cognitive bias scenarios adapted from real-world Morbidity & Mortality (M&M) and incident review contexts. While not a formal research evaluation, DEEP SEE™ offers a structured, bias-aware approach that can be integrated into existing patient safety review processes and provides a foundation for future empirical study.
- World Health Organization (2020) Patient Safety Incident Reporting and Learning Systems: Technical Report and Guidance.
- Peerally, M.F., Carr, S., Waring, J. and Dixon-Woods, M. (2016) The Problem with Root Cause Analysis. BMJ Quality & Safety , 26, 417-422. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2016-005511
- Bataweel, A.O. and BinOthaimeen, N. (2023) Personality Traits, Thinking Style, and Emotional Intelligence among Pharmacy Staff towards Safer Patient Care. Psycholo gy , 14, 1015-1032. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2023.146054
- Bataweel, A.O. (2023) Personality Traits, Thinking Styles, and Emotional Intelligence in Nursing, towards Healthcare Providers’ Characterization and Safer Patient Care. Open Journal of Nursing , 13, 130-166. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojn.2023.132009
- Ko, C.J., Gehlhausen, J.R., Cohen, J.M., Jiang, Y., Myung, P. and Croskerry, P. (2025) Cognitive Bias in the Patient Encounter: Part II. Debiasing Using an Adaptive Toolbox. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology , 92, 223-230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2024.02.061
- Putman III, H.P. (2024) Encountering Treatment Resistance: Solutions through Reconceptualization. American Psychiatric Pub.
- Hytopoulos, T., Chan, M., Roth, K., Wasson, R. and Huang, F. (2024) An Approach to Cognitive Root Cause Analysis of Software Vulnerabilities. Product - Focused Software Process Improvement : 25 th International Conference , PROFES 2024, Tartu, 2-4 December 2024, 11-26. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-78386-9_2
- National Patient Safety Foundation (2015) RCA2: Improving Root Cause Analyses and Actions to Prevent Harm. National Patient Safety Foundation.
- Norman, G.R., Monteiro, S.D., Sherbino, J., Ilgen, J.S., Schmidt, H.G. and Mamede, S. (2017) The Causes of Errors in Clinical Reasoning: Cognitive Biases, Knowledge Deficits, and Dual Process Thinking. Academic Medicine , 92, 23-30. https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0000000000001421
- Card, A.J. (2016) The Problem with “5 Whys”. BMJ Quality & Safety , 26, 671-677. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2016-005849
- Deshpande, M., Sinclair, J.M.A. and Baldwin, D.S. (2023) Validity of Root Cause Analysis in Investigating Adverse Events in Psychiatry. The British Journal o f Psychiatry , 222, 153-156. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.2023.2
- Dekker, S. (2018) Just Culture: Restoring Trust and Accountability in Your Organization. CRC Press.