Application of Optical Coherence Tomography in Determining Stent Deployment Position in Coronary Artery Left Main Bifurcation Lesions
- 1 Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Huaihua Central Hospital, Huaihua, China
- 2 Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Huaihua Central Hospital, Huaihua, China
- 3 Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Huaihua Central Hospital, Huaihua, China
- 4 Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Huaihua Central Hospital, Huaihua, China
- 5 Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Huaihua Central Hospital, Huaihua, China
- 6 Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Huaihua Central Hospital, Huaihua, China
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the clinical value of optical coherence tomography (OCT) in determining stent deployment position and post-procedural optimization during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for coronary artery left main (LM) bifurcation lesions. Methods: A total of 90 patients with LM bifurcation lesions were prospectively enrolled and randomly assigned to an OCT-guided group (45 cases) and an IVUS-guided group (45 cases). Both groups received intravascular imaging guidance in addition to standard angiography. The intraoperative imaging findings, accuracy of stent deployment position, postoperative hemodynamic improvement, and 12-month major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) were compared. Results: The post-procedural minimal stent area (MSA) in the OCT group was significantly larger than in the IVUS group (8.6 ± 1.2 mm 2 vs 7.8 ± 1.1 mm 2 , p < 0.01). The incidence of malapposition was lower (6.7% vs 17.8%, p = 0.04). The rate of additional optimization due to edge dissection or malapposition during the procedure was higher (31.1% vs 15.6%, p = 0.03). At 12-month follow-up, the MACE rate in the OCT group was 8.9%, lower than the IVUS group’s 20.0% (p = 0.045). Conclusion: OCT can more precisely identify lesion borders and ostial morphology in LM bifurcation lesions, and is superior to IVUS in determining stent deployment position and post-procedural optimization. This suggests its higher clinical application value in complex bifurcation lesions.
- Lindstrom, M., DeCleene, N., Dorsey, H., Fuster, V., Johnson, C.O., LeGrand, K.E., et al. (2022) Global Burden of Cardiovascular Diseases and Risks Collaboration, 1990-2021. Journal of the American College of Cardiology , 80, 2372-2425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2022.11.001
- Collet, C., Capodanno, D., Onuma, Y., Banning, A., Stone, G.W., Taggart, D.P., et al. (2018) Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Treatment. Nature Reviews Cardiology , 15, 321-331. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41569-018-0001-4
- Conley, M.J., Ely, R.L., Kisslo, J., Lee, K.L., McNeer, J.F. and Rosati, R.A. (1978) The Prognostic Spectrum of Left Main Stenosis. Circulation , 57, 947-952. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.57.5.947
- Armstrong, P.W., Bates, E.R. and Gaudino, M. (2022) Left Main Coronary Disease: Evolving Management Concepts. European Heart Journal , 43, 4635-4643. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehac542
- Lassen, J., Burzotta, F., Banning, A., Lefèvre, T., Darremont, O., Hildick-Smith, D., et al. (2018) Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for the Left Main Stem and Other Bifurcation Lesions: 12th Consensus Document from the European Bifurcation Club. EuroIntervention , 13, 1540-1553. https://doi.org/10.4244/eij-d-17-00622
- Bruno, F., Kang, J., Elia, E., Han, J., De Filippo, O., Yang, H., et al. (2023) Impact of Diabetes on Long‐term Outcomes of Bifurcation Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. an Analysis from the BIFURCAT Registry. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions , 102, 620-630. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.30802
- Lee, Z.S. and Ryan, N. (2024) Intravascular Imaging in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. The Lancet , 403, 783-785. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(23)02686-7
- Amin, A.M., Khlidj, Y., Abuelazm, M., Sayed, A., Khan, U., Elewidi, M.M., et al. (2024) Intravascular Imaging-Guided versus Angiography-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. BMC Cardiovascular Disorders , 24, Article No. 483. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-024-04105-5
- Räber, L., Mintz, G.S., Koskinas, K.C., Johnson, T.W., Holm, N.R., Onuma, Y., et al. (2018) Clinical Use of Intracoronary Imaging. Part 1: Guidance and Optimization of Coronary Interventions. An Expert Consensus Document of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions. European Heart Journal , 39, 3281-3300. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehy285