Comparison of stepping parameters and center of foot pressure properties during different tempo stepping movements
- 1 Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Fukui, Fukui, Japan
- 2 Graduate School of Natural Science & Technology, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Japan
- 3 School of Medicine, Gifu University, Gifu, Japan
- 4 Kanazawa College of Art, Kanazawa, Japan
- 5 Kanazawa Gakuin High School, Kanazawa, Japan
Abstract
This study was designed to examine the trial-to-trial reliability of stepping parameters and to compare the center of foot pressure (COP) when adapting to different tempos. Twenty healthy men (M age = 20.8, SD = 1.9 years) performed stepping tests to fixed tempos. The intra-class correlation coefficients of stepping and COP parameters were high (0.75 - 0.97). The time difference between foot contact time and fixed tempo and COP sway velocities of the X- and Y-axis were the largest at 40 beats per minute (bpm). At 60 and 120 bpm tempos, single support and swing times reflecting the stepping strategy correlated significantly with the root mean square and the velocity of the X-axis (r = I0.45 - 0.53I) . Because these step tempos are controlled largely by the automation of stepping, the single support and swing phases appeared to have a constant frequency. On the other hand, a stepping tempo of 40 bpm showed the largest sway velocity of X and Y and the smallest surrounding area mean path length. The above suggests that stepping at 40 bpm induced a larger sway area in relation to total path length and faster COP sway. Hence, it is inferred that the stepping task becomes more difficult at 40 bpm than at 60 and 120 bpm.
- Oliver, D. (2007) Older people who fall: Why they matter and what you can do. British Journal of Community Nursing, 12, 500-507.
- Kikuchi, R., Kozaki, K., Nakamura, T. and Toba, K. (2008) Muscle and bone health as a risk factor of fall among the elderly. An approach to identify high-risk fallers by risk assessment. Clinical Calcium, 18, 784-787.
- Cutson, T.M. (1994) Falls in the elderly. American Family Physicians, 49, 149-156.
- Banez, C., Tully, S., Amaral, L., Kwan, D., Kung, A., Mak, K., Moghabghab, R. and Alibhai, S.M. (2008) Development, implementation, and evaluation of an Interprofessional Falls Prevention Program for older adults. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 56, 1549-1555. doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.01790.x
- van der Velde, N., Stricker, B.H., Pols, H.A. and van der Cammen, T.J. (2007) Withdrawal of fall-risk-increasing drugs in older persons: Effect on mobility test outcomes. Drugs and aging, 24, 691-699. doi:10.2165/00002512-200724080-00006
- Gill, J., Allum, J.H., Carpenter, M.G., Held-Ziolkowska, M., Adkin, A.L., Honegger, F. and Pierchala, K. (2001) Trunk sway measures of postural stability during clinical balance tests: effects of age. The Journals of Gerontology. Series A, Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 56, M438-M447. doi:10.1093/gerona/56.7.M438
- Graham, R.C., Smith, N.M. and White, C.M. (2005) The reliability and validity of the physiological cost index in healthy subjects while walking on 2 different tracks. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 86, 2041-2046. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2005.04.022
- Newton, R.A. (1997) Balance screening of an inner city older adult population. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 78, 587-591. doi:10.1016/S0003-9993(97)90423-8
- Rubenstein, L.Z., Josephson, K.R., Trueblood, P.R., Yeung, K., Harker, J.O. and Robbins, A.S. (1997) The reliability and validity of an obstacle course as a measure of gait and balance in older adults. Aging (Milano), 9, 127-135.
- Medell, J.L. and Alexander, N.B. (2000) A clinical meassure of maximal and rapid stepping in older women. The Journals of Gerontology. Series A, Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 55, M429-M433. doi:10.1093/gerona/55.8.M429
- Cho, B.L., Scarpace, D. and Alexander, N.B. (2004) Tests of stepping as indicators of mobility, balance, and fall risk in balance-impaired older adults. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 52, 1168-1173. doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2004.52317.x