Mortality rates from a Nigerian isolate of the <i>Infectious Bursa Disease Virus</i> and passive haemagglutination antibody titer that protects chicks against challenge with the virus isolate — Oak Academic Publishing
Research ArticleOpen AccessGoogle Scholar indexed
Mortality rates from a Nigerian isolate of the <i>Infectious Bursa Disease Virus</i> and passive haemagglutination antibody titer that protects chicks against challenge with the virus isolate
Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Nigeria
,
Department of Veterinary Microbiology and Pathology, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Nigeria
,
Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Nigeria;
,
Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Nigeria;
,
Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Nigeria;
,
Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Nigeria;
,
Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Nigeria;
1 Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Nigeria
2 Department of Veterinary Microbiology and Pathology, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Nigeria
3 Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Nigeria;
4 Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Nigeria;
5 Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Nigeria;
6 Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Nigeria;
7 Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, Nigeria;
To determine passive haemagglutination (PHA) antibody titer that would protect chicks against Nigerian isolates of the Infectious Bursa Disease Virus (IBDV), five groups of chicks aged 30 days which had different antibody titers were challenged with a Nigerian isolate of virulent IBDV. Mortality rates of the different groups were plotted against their respective mean PHA antibody titers. A group with zero antibody titer had a mortality rate of 75% while those with PHA antibody titers of 185.6, 243.2, 256 and 307.2 had mortality rates of 40%, zero, zero and zero respectively. Linear equation generated for a line of best fit of the graph of mortality rates of the chicks on their IBD antibody titers gave antibody titer (X) at which mortality (Y) would be zero as 300. A mortality of 75% and the high antibody level needed to protect chicks suggest that the isolate may be a hypervirulent strain.
KeywordsProtective Antibody TiterHypervirulent Infectious Bursa Disease Virus StrainNigerian Isolate
Chou, K.C. and Calnek, B.W. (1997) Diseases of poultry, Iowa state university press. 10th Edition, Ames, Iowa 721-733.
Cosgrove, A.S. (1962) An apparently new disease of chickens-Avian nephrosis. Avian Disease, 6, 385-389. doi:10.2307/1587909
Cho, Y. and Edgar, S.A. (1969) Characterisation of the infectious bursal agent. Poult. Science, 48, 2102-2109. doi:10.3382/ps.0482102
United Kingdom Epidermiological unit, central vet. Lab (1981) Subclinical infectious bursal disease in broiler industry. Interim report. Veterinary Record, 108, 88-89.
Okoye, J.O.A. and Uzoukwu, M. (1981) An outbreak of infectious bursal disease among Chickens between 16 and 20 week old. Avian Disease, 25, 1034-1038. doi:10.2307/1590079
Okoye, J.O.A. (1983) The pathogenecity and pathology of a Nigerian isolate of infectious bursal disease virus in chickens. M. Phil. Diss., University of Nigeria, Nsukka.
Okoye, J.O.A. and Soyinka, S.V.O. (1983) Newcastle disease in a vaccinated flock which had experienced subclinical infections bursal disease. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 15, 221-225. doi:10.1007/BF02242062
Muller, H. (1986) Replication of infectious bursal disease virus in lymphoid cells. Archives of Virology, 87, 191-203. doi:10.1007/BF01315299
Mcllroy, S.G., Goodall, D.W., Bruce, D.W., McCracken, R.M. and McNulty, M.S. (1992) The cost benefit of vaccinating broiler flocks against subclinical infectious bursal disease. Avian Pathology, 21, 65-76. doi:10.1080/03079459208418819
Okoye, J.O.A. and Aba-Adulugba, E.P. (1998) Comparative study of the resistance or susceptibility of local Nigerian chicken and exotic chickens to Infectious bursal Disease. Avian Pathology, 27, 168-173. doi:10.1080/03079459808419319
Helmbolt, C.F. and Garner, E. (1964) Experimentally induced Gumboro disease (IBA). Avian Disease, 8, 561-575. doi:10.2307/1587944
Maire, C., Renault, L., Alamagny, A., Dreuille, M.D.E. and Albouy, R. (1969) Existence en France de la maladie de Gumboro. Rec med. Vet, 145, 75-84.
Chineme, C.N. (1977) Clinicopathologic and morphologic changes in experimental infectious bursal (Gumboro) disease. Abstracts of papers presented at the 14th Annual conference of the Nigerian Veterinary Medical Association. Journal of Nigerian Veterinary Medical Association, 61, 46.
Hirai, K.K., Kunihiro and Shimakura, S. (1979) Characterization of immunosuppressionin chickens by infectious bursal disease virus. Avian Disease, 23, 950-965. doi:10.2307/1589611
Delegation of the United States of America (1977) Infectious bursal disease (Gumbro) Field incidence in the United States. Bulletin de l Office International des Epizooties, 88, 313-322.
Gyening, K.O. and Corkish, J.D. (1977) Infectious bursal disease in Ghana. Bulletin de l Office International des Epizooties, 88, 293-298.
Schobries, H.D., Wilke, I. and Schmidt, V. (1977) Infektiose Bursitis (Gumboro disease) in einem Broiler-best-and. Veterinary Medicine, 32, 700-704.
Mcferran, J.B., McNulty, M.S., Mckillop, E.R., Conner, T.J., McCracken, R.M., Collins, D.S. and Allan G.M. (1980) Isolation and serological studies with infectious bursal disease viruses from fowl, turkey and duck: Demonstration of a second serotype. Avian Pathology, 9, 395-404. doi:10.1080/03079458008418423
Tsukamoto, K., Tanimura, N., Kakita, S., Ota, K., Mase, M., Imai, K. and Hihara, H. (1995) Efficacy of three live vaccines against highly virulent infections bursal disease virus in chickens with or without maternal antibodies. Avian Disease, 39, 218-229. doi:10.2307/1591863
Jackwood, D.J. and Saif, Y.M. (1983) Prevalence of antibodies to infectious bursal disease virus serotypes I and II in 75 Ohio Chicken. Avian Disease, 27, 850-854. doi:10.2307/1590331
Etterradossi, N. (2001) Major advances in infectious bursal disease virus (IBV) research seen the first international IBDV/.CIAV symposium (Rauischholzhausen, Germany, 1994) Proceeding of II International symposium on infectious bursal disease and Chicken Infectious Anaemia, Rauischholzhausen, 16-20 July 2001, 6-23.
Jackwood, D.J., Saif, Y.M. and Hughes, J.H. (1982) Characteristics and serological studies of two serotypes of infectious bursal disease virus in turkeys. Avian Disease, 26, 871-882. doi:10.2307/1589875
Mcferran, J.B., McNulty, M.S., Mckillop, E.R., Conner, T.J., McCracken, R.M., Collins, D.S. and Allan, G.M. (1980) Isolation and serological studies with infectious bursal disease viruses from fowl, turkey and duck: Demonstration of a second serotype. Avian Pathology, 9, 395-404. doi:10.1080/03079458008418423
Jackwood, D.J., Saif, Y.M. and Moorhead, P.D. (1985) Immunogenicity of infectious bursal disease virus serotypes I and II IN chickens. Avian Disease, 29, 1184-1194. doi:10.2307/1590472
Ismail, N., Saif, Y.M. and Moorhead, P.D. (1988) Lack of pathogenicity of five serotype 2 infectious bursal disease viruses in chickens. Avian Disease, 32, 757-759. doi:10.2307/1590995
Jackwood, D.J., Saif, Y.M. and Hughes, J.H. (1982) Characteristics and serological studies of two serotypes of infectious bursal disease virus in turkeys. Avian Disease, 26, 871-882. doi:10.2307/1589875
Ismail, N.M., Saif, Y.M., Wigle, W.L., Havenstein G.B. and Jackson, C. (1990) Infectious bursal disease virus variant from commercial Leghorn pullets. Avian Disease, 34, 141-145.
Jackwood, D.J., Saif, Y.M. and Moorhead, P.D. (1985) Immunogenicity of infectious bursal disease virus serotypes I and II IN chickens. Avian Disease, 29, 1184-1194. doi:10.2307/1590472
Saif, Y.M. (1984) Infectious bursal disease virus types in Proceedings of 19th National Meeting of Poult Heaith Condemn, Ocean City, 105-107.
Cynthia (2005) Infectious bursal disease (Gumbro disase), Merck veterinary mammal, Merck & Co., Inc., White House Station, 2248-2253.
Shome, B.R., Shome, R., Snvastava, N. and Bandy, A.K. (1997) Infectious bursal disease in the Andamas: Isolation and identification of the virus. Indian Veterinary Journal, 74, 281-283.
Chettle, N.J.C., Stuart and Wyeth, P.J. (1989) Outbreak of virulent infectious bursal disease in East Anglia. Veterinary Record, 125, 271-272. doi:10.1136/vr.125.10.271
Vanden Berg, T.P. and Meulemans, G. (1991) Acute infectious bursal disease in poultry: protection afforded by maternally derived antibodies and interference with live vaccination. Avian Pathology, 20, 409-421. doi:10.1080/03079459108418779
Onunkwo, O. (1975) Problems of gumboro disease of chickens in Nigeria. Journal of Nigeria Poultry Science, 2, 95-101.
Lukert, P.D. and Saif, Y.M. (2003) Infectious bursal disease. In Saif, Y.M., Glisson, J.R., Fadly, A.M., McDougald, L.R. and Swayne, D.E. (Eds.), Diseases of Poultry, 11th Edition, Iowa State University Press, Ames, 161-180.
Ezeibe, M.C.O., Okoye, J.O.A., Ogunniran, T.M., Okoroafor, O.N., Ezeala, I.E. and Ngene, A.A. (2012) Modification of the passive heamagglutination test for detection of infectious bursal disease virus. Health, 4, 653-655. doi:10.4236/health.2012.49102