Incorporating heterogeneous biological data sources in clustering gene expression data
- 1
- 2
Abstract
In this paper, a similarity measure between genes with protein-protein interactions is pro-posed. The chip-chip data are converted into the same form of gene expression data with pear-son correlation as its similarity measure. On the basis of the similarity measures of protein- protein interaction data and chip-chip data, the combined dissimilarity measure is defined. The combined distance measure is introduced into K-means method, which can be considered as an improved K-means method. The improved K-means method and other three clustering methods are evaluated by a real dataset. Per-formance of these methods is assessed by a prediction accuracy analysis through known gene annotations. Our results show that the improved K-means method outperforms other clustering methods. The performance of the improved K-means method is also tested by varying the tuning coefficients of the combined dissimilarity measure. The results show that it is very helpful and meaningful to incorporate het-erogeneous data sources in clustering gene expression data, and those coefficients for the genome-wide or completed data sources should be given larger values when constructing the combined dissimilarity measure.
- D. Lockhart and E. Winzeler, (2000) Genomics gene expression and DNA arrays, Nature, 405, 827-846.
- M. B. Eisen, P. T. Spellman, P. O. Brown, and D. Botstein, (1998) Cluster analysis and display of genome- wide expression patterns, Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 95, 14863-14868.
- S. Tavazoie, J. D. Hughes, M. J. Campbell, R. J. Cho, and G. M. Church, (1999) Systematic determination of genetic network architecture, Nature Genetics, 22, 281-285.
- P. Tamayo, D. Slonim, J. Mesirov, Q. Zhu, S. Kitareewan, E. Dmitrovsky, E. S. Lander, and T. R. Golub, (1999) Interpreting patterns of gene expression with self-organizing maps: Methods and application to hematopoietic differentiation, Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 96, 2907–2912.
- S. Raychaudhuri, J. M. Stuart, and R. B. Altman, (2000) Principal component analysis to summarize microarray experiments: Application to sporulation time series, Pac. Symp. Biocomput., 455–466.
- M. P. Brown, W. N. Grundy, D. Lin, N. Cristianini, C. W. Sugnet, T. S. Furey, M. Jr. Ares, and D. Haussler, (2000) Knowledge-based analysis of microarray gene expression data by using support vector machines, Proc. Natl Acad. Sci, 97, 262–267.
- H. Xia, A. Panaye, and B. T. Fan, (2007) Nonlinear SVM approaches to QSPR/QSAR studies and drug design, Current Computer-Aided Drug Design, 3, 341–352.
- D. Hanisch, A. Zien, R. Zimmer, and T. Lengauer, (2002) Coclustering of biological networks and gene expression data, Bioinformatics, 18, 145–154.
- J. Kasturi and R. Acharya, (2005) Clustering of diverse genomic data using information fusion, Bioinformatics, 21, 423–429.
- K. Rafal and Z. Adam, (2006) Incorporating gene ontology in clustering gene expression data, CBMS’06.
- L. Kaufman and P. Rousseeuw, (1990) Finding groups in data: An introduction to cluster analysis, Wiley, New York.
- S. Chris, B. Bobby-Joe , R. Teresa, B. Lorrie, B. Ashton, and T. Mike, (2006) BioGRID: A general repository for interaction datasets, Nucleic Acids Research, Database issue, 34, D535–D539.
- X. loannis, F. Esteban, S. Lukasz, D. Xiaoqun, T. Michael, M. Edward, and E. David, (2001) DIP: The database of interacing proteins: 2001 update, Nucleic Acids Research, 29, 239–241.
- C. Alfarano, C. E. Andrade, K. Anthony, N. Bahroos, M. Bajec, K. Bantoft, D. Betel, B. Bobechko, K. Boutilier, and E. Burgess, (2005) The biomolecular interaction network database and related tools: 2005 update, Nucleic Acids Res., 33, D418–D424.