Lifestyle after Cardiac Rehabilitation: Did the Message Come across, and Was It Feasible? An Analysis of Patients’ Narratives
- 1 Department of Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- 2 Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- 3 Centre of Research in Rehabilitation (CORIR), Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital and Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- 4 Section of Nursing, Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
Abstract
Lifestyle following heart disease is considered important to prevent and reduce cardiovascular risk factors. Thus, cardiac rehabilitation is focused on potential lifestyle changes. Further insight into patients’ perspective on lifestyle after cardiac rehabilitation is needed as changing habits following heart disease is a complex matter. The objective of this study was to explore the characteristics of lifestyle after cardiac rehabilitation. A phenomenological-hermeneutic approach with qualitative interviews was performed in 20 patients six months after completing a hospital-based cardiac rehabilitation programme in 2012 at Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark. The patients were diagnosed with ischemic heart disease, heart failure or left heart valve disease. The interviews were analysed using the interpretation theory by Ricoeur. The variation in reactions to cardiac rehabilitation were: 1) considering prior lifestyle to be appropriate, maybe with minor adjustments; 2) acknowledging the need for incorporating lifestyle changes; and 3) reconciling or feeling guilt when being unable to manage changes. Participation in the cardiac rehabilitation programme was a positive experience, but it had minor influence on long-term adherence to recommended lifestyle. The important thing in establishing new routines was whether they aroused interest, and whether the experience of changes was perceived as necessary and manageable. In future cardiac rehabilitation, focusing on patients’ interests and supporting them in incorporating recommendations into their everyday life might be essential following heart disease, also after ending cardiac rehabilitation.
- Piepoli, M.F., Corrà, U., Benzer, W., et al. (2010) Secondary Prevention through Cardiac Rehabilitation: From Knowledge to Implementation. A Position Paper from the Cardiac Rehabilitation Section of the European Association of Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation. European Journal of Preventive Cardiology, 17, 1-17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/HJR.0b013e3283313592
- Corrà, U., Piepoli, M.F., Carré, F., et al. (2010) Secondary Prevention through Cardiac Rehabilitation: Physical Activity Counselling and Exercise Training: Key Components of the Position Paper from the Cardiac Rehabilitation Section of the European Association of Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation. European Heart Journal, 31, 1967-1974.
- Leventhal, H., Weinman, J., Leventhal, E.A., et al. (2008) Health Psychology: The Search for Pathways between Behavior and Health. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 477-505. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093643
- Murray, J., Honey, S., Hill, K., et al. (2012) Individual Influences on Lifestyle Change to Reduce Vascular Risk: A Qualitative Literature Review. British Journal of General Practice. http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/bjgp12X649089
- Fletcher, S.M., Burley, M.B., Thomas, K.E., et al. (2014) Feeling Supported and Abandoned: Mixed Messages from Attendance at a Rural Community Cardiac Rehabilitation Program in Australia. Journal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation & Prevention, 24, 29-33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/HCR.0b013e3182a52734
- Pryor, T., Page, K., Patsamanis, H., et al. (2014) Investigating Support Needs for People Living with Heart Disease. Journal of Clinical Nursing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12165
- White, S., Bissell, P. and Anderson, C. (2010) Patients’ Perspectives on Cardiac Rehabilitation, Lifestyle Change and Taking Medicines: Implications for Service Development. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 15, 47-53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1258/jhsrp.2009.009103
- Meillier, L.K., Nielsen, K.M., Larsen, F.B., et al. (2012) Socially Differentiated Cardiac Rehabilitation: Can We Improve Referral, Attendance and Adherence among Patients with First Myocardial Infarction? Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 40, 286-293 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1403494812443600
- Clark, A., King-Shier, K., Spalling, M., et al. (2013) Factors Influencing Participation in Cardiac Rehabilitation Programmes after Referral and Initial Attendance: Qualitative Systematic Review and Meta-Synthesis. Clinical Rehabilitation, 27, 948-950. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0269215513481046