Research ArticleOpen AccessGoogle Scholar indexed
Contribution of Risk Perception for the Analysis of Non-Compliance to Work Procedures
LRPI Laboratory of Institute of Health and Safety, University of Batna, Batna, Algeria
LRPI Laboratory of Institute of Health and Safety, University of Batna, Batna, Algeria
HSE Department of Regional Direction of Hassi R’mel, Group of Sonatrach, Laghouat, Algeria
- 1 LRPI Laboratory of Institute of Health and Safety, University of Batna, Batna, Algeria
- 2 LRPI Laboratory of Institute of Health and Safety, University of Batna, Batna, Algeria
- 3 HSE Department of Regional Direction of Hassi R’mel, Group of Sonatrach, Laghouat, Algeria
Copy link · social · email
Abstract
One of the problems encountered in work security is non-compliance to work procedures by operators. The consequences of such human behavior are harmful to both the operators and the organization. These consequences are the result of a situational behavior of operators. This article focuses on the perception of work situations in a sample of Algerian workers in oil companies knowing that this perception determines, in large part, the decisions taken by the operators in terms of non-compliance with work procedures.
KeywordsWork ProcedureNon-ComplianceHuman BehaviorHuman Perception
- Stromme, M. (2013) Safety Training for the Oil and Gas Worker. J. J. Keller & Associates, Inc.
- Leplat, J. and Rasmussen, J. (1984) Analysis of Human Errors in Industrial Incidents and Accidents for Improvement of Work Safety. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 16, 77-88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0001-4575(84)90033-2
- INRS Report (2012) Safety of the Machines: Operating Modes and Neutralized Protections. INRS Editions ID 6129, France.
- Rosenberg, N. and Frischtak, C. (1985) International Technology Transfer: Concepts, Measures and Comparisons. Praeger Editors, New York.
- Dudognon, K. and Soulard, N. (2004) Design and Setting in Conformity of the Machines and Working Equipments. Document of the Faculty of Pharmacy, Mediterranean University, Marseille.
- Mouda, M. and Djebabra, M. (2013) Proposition of a Participative Approach for the Information Risk Control: Application to Industrial Procedures Improvement. AWER Procedia Information Technology & Computer Science, 3, 1004-1009.
- De Brito, Y. (2006) Statut et non-respect des procédures écrites. Intellectica, 44, 63-85.
- Hollnagel, E. (1993) The Phenotype of Erroneous Actions. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 39, 1-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/imms.1993.1051
- Kohonen, T. (2001) Self-Organizing Maps. 3rd Edition, Springer, New York. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-56927-2
- Lievens, F., Peeters, H. and Schollaert, E. (2008) Situational Judgment Tests: A Review of Recent Research. Personnel Review, 37, 426-441. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00483480810877598
- Analoui, F. (2007) Strategic Human Resource Management. Thomson, London.
- Degenne, A. and Lemel, Y. (2006) Sociologie des comportements intentionnels. Economica Editions.
- Wittorski, R. (1997) Analyse du travail et production des compétences collectives. L’Harmattan Ed.
- Cohen, M., Jaffray, J.-Y. and Said, T. (1987) Experimental Comparison of Individual Behavior under Risk and under Uncertainty for Gains and for Losses. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, 39, 1-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(87)90043-4
- Beattie, J. and Loomes, G. (1997) The Impact of Incentives upon Risky Choice Experiment. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 14, 155-168. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1007721327452