Patients’ Expectations in a Geriatric Rehabilitation Ward: Matching with Actual Outcomes
- 1 Geriatric Rehabilitation Unit/Intermediate Care, Geriatric Institute “Camillo Golgi”, Agency for Services to Persons (ASP) Golgi Redaelli, Milano, Italy
- 2 Sociology Department, University of Milan, Milano, Italy
- 3 Sociology Department, University of Milan, Milano, Italy
- 4 Geriatric Rehabilitation Unit/Intermediate Care, Geriatric Institute “Camillo Golgi”, Agency for Services to Persons (ASP) Golgi Redaelli, Milano, Italy
- 5 Geriatric Rehabilitation Unit/Intermediate Care, Geriatric Institute “Camillo Golgi”, Agency for Services to Persons (ASP) Golgi Redaelli, Milano, Italy
- 6 Geriatric Rehabilitation Unit/Intermediate Care, Geriatric Institute “Camillo Golgi”, Agency for Services to Persons (ASP) Golgi Redaelli, Milano, Italy
- 7 Geriatric Rehabilitation Unit/Intermediate Care, Geriatric Institute “Camillo Golgi”, Agency for Services to Persons (ASP) Golgi Redaelli, Milano, Italy
- 8 Golgi Cenci Foundation, Abbiategrasso, Italy
Abstract
Aim: Person-centered care is a core issue in rehabilitation; the study aims at: 1) enquiring the outcome expectations of patients in a geriatric rehabilitation ward; 2) matching outcome expectations with actual outcomes. Methods: Expectations of 186 patients [79.4 (8.7) years, 70% females] analyzed through a questionnaire. 80.6% of patients were discharged home; functional recovery = 17.7 (22) points in Barthel Index total score, and 5 (4.2) points in Barthel Index walking subscore; also conditions with nursing needs improved significantly. Results: Patients’ expectations were coded as: functional (31.4%), overall (29.6%), and clinical improvement (21.5%), discharge home (7%); no answers or explicit lack of expectations (7.5%). Walking ability recovery differed according to outcome expectations. Highest improvements were achieved by patients wishing clinical improvement, followed by those expecting functional or overall improvement (5 points) [p = 0.009 (Welch)/p = 0.041 (Brown- Forsythe)]; worst improvement in walking ability (2.8 points) were got by patients faulting or declaring explicit failure of expectations. Conditions with nursing needs improved most in those expecting clinical improvements [p = 0.029 (Brown-Forsythe)], and less in case of expectation default. No further matching was found. Conclusions: Improvement in actual outcomes matched expected improvements in two circumstances: recovery in walking ability and in conditions with nursing needs. The high yield of different favorable outcomes may have masked the statistical significance for correspondence between actual and expected results. Special attention is worthy towards patients short of expectations, as their actual outcomes result poorer.
- Bachmann, S., Finger, C., Huss, A., Egger, M., Stuck, A.E. and Clough-Gorr, K.M. (2010) Inpatient Rehabilitation Specifically Designed for Geriatric Patients: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials. BMJ, 340, c1718. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c1718
- Bellelli, G., Guerini, F., Bianchetti, A., De Palma, D., Ther, P. and Trabucchi, M. (2002) Medical Comorbity and Complexity of the Rehabilitative Procedures for Older Patients with Functional Impairments. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 50, 2095-2096. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1532-5415.2002.50628.x
- Bellelli, G., Bernardini, B., Pievani, M., Frisoni, G.B., Guaita, A. and Trabucchi, M. (2012) A Score to Predict the Development of Adverse Clinical Events after Transition from Acute Hospital Wards to Post-Acute Care Settings. Rejuvenation Research, 15, 553-563. https://doi.org/10.1089/rej.2012.1332
- Gurwitz, J.H., Sanchez-Cross, M.T., Eckler, M.A. and Matulis, J. (1994) The Epidemiology of Adverse and Unexpected Events in the Long-Term Care Setting. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 42, 33-38. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.1994.tb06070.x
- Yancic, R., Ershler, W., Satariano, W., Hazzard, W., Cohen, H.J. and Ferrucci, L. (2007) Report of the National Institute on Aging Task Force on Comorbidity. Journal of Gerontology Medical Sciences, 62A, 275-280. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/62.3.275
- Stolee, P., Stadnyk, K., Myers, A.M. and Rockwood, K. (1999) An Individualized Approach to Outcome Measurement in Geriatric Rehabilitation. Journal of Gerontology Medical Sciences, 54A, M641-M647. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/54.12.M641
- McPhail, S.M., Nalder, E., Hill, A-M. and Haines, T.P. (2013) Physiotherapists Have Accurate Expectations of Their Patients’ Future Health-Related Quality of Life after First Assessment in a Subacute Rehabilitation Setting. BioMed Research International, Article ID 340371.
- Quinn, T.J., Dawson, J., Walters, M.R. and Lees, K.R. (2009) Reliability of the Modified Rankin Scale. Stroke, 40, 3393-3395. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.557256
- Shah, S., Vanclay, F. and Cooper, B. (1989) Improving the Sensitivity of the Barthel Index for Stroke Rehabilitation. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 42, 703-709. https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-4356(89)90065-6
- Folstein, M.F., Folstein, S.E. and McHugh, P.R. (1975) Mini-Mental State: A Practical Method for Grading the Cognitive State of Patients for the Clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12, 189-198. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6