Research ArticleOpen AccessGoogle Scholar indexed
Corporate Image Cognition Influence Perceived Quality and Purchase Intention Empirical Research
Economics and Management School, Tianjin University of Technology and Education, Tianjin, China
Economics and Management School, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing, China
Economics and Management School, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing, China
- 1 Economics and Management School, Tianjin University of Technology and Education, Tianjin, China
- 2 Economics and Management School, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing, China
- 3 Economics and Management School, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing, China
Copy link · social · email
Abstract
Based on the theory of corporate image and perceived quality, we researched influence of consumers corporate image cognition on consumers perceived quality and purchase intention. We take the telecoms operator as practical example to do questionnaire survey and analyze the data with SPSS16.0 and structural equation model; the research results show that consumers’ corporate image cognition directly and prominently affects perceived quality instead of consumer purchase intention; It also shows that in china marketing environment , the social image of corporate image has the greatest effect on consumer perceived quality, followed by staff image and marketing image.
KeywordsCorporate Image CognitionPerceived QualityPurchase Intention
- Y. X. Bai and H. Xu, “The Development of Small and Medium-sized Enterprises and Reputation Management,” Economic Management, Vol. 8, 2001, pp. 20-21.
- Brucks, Merrie, V. A. Zeithaml and G. Naylor, “Price and Brand Name as Indicators of Quality Dimensions for Consumer Durables,” Academy of Marketing Science, 2000, Vol. 28, No. 3, pp. 217-222. doi:10.1177/0092070300283005
- N. Bi, “An Experimental Research on the Impact of Cluster Branding Based on Product Perceived Quality,” Management Review, 2009, Vol. 21, No. 5, pp. 23-26.
- T. J. Brown and A. D. Peter, “The Company and the Prodct: Corporate Associiations and Consumer Product Response,” Journal of Marketing, 1997, Vol. 2, pp. 68-84. doi:10.2307/1252190
- R. O. Carlson, “The Nature of Corporate Images,” In the Coporation and its Publics, John W. Riely, Jr., ed. New York: John,Wiley&Sons,1963, pp. 24-47
- W. B. Dodds, K. B. Monroe and D. Grewal, “Effects of Price, Brand, and Store Information on Buyers'product Evaluations,” Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 28, No. 3, 1991, pp. 307-319. doi:10.2307/3172866
- C. J. Fombrun, N. A. Gardberg and J. M. Sever, “The Reputation Quotient：A Multi-stakeholder Measure of Corporate Reputation,” Journal of Grand Management, Vol. 7, No. 4, 2000, pp. 241-255
- D. A. Garvin, “Competing on the Eight Dimensions of Quality,” Harvard Business Review, Vol. 65, No. 11, pp. 101- 112
- H. H. Huang, “Comparison of Strong and Weak of Brandassociation,” Psychological Science, Vol. 5, 2002, p. 605.
- K. G. Hardy, “Whatever Happened to Image?” Business Quarterly, 1970, Vol. 35, pp. 70-76.
- K. L. Keller, “Conceptualizing, Measuring, and Managing Customer-Based Brand Equity,” Journal of Marketing, 1993, Vol. 57, No. 1, pp. 1-22. doi:10.2307/1252054
- A. Kirmani and H. Baumgartner, “Reference Points Used in Quality and Value Judgements,” Marketing Letters, Vol. 11, No. 4, 2000, pp. 299-310. doi:10.1023/A:1008129011202
- M. Schwaiger, “Components and Parameters of Corporate Reputation an Empirical Study,” Schmalenbach Business Review：ZFBF, 2004, Vol. 56, pp. 46-72.
- D. Mitran, P. N. Golder, “How does Objective Quality Affect Perceived Quality? Short-Term Effects, Long-Term Effects, and As Asymmetries,” Marketing Science, Vol. 25, No. 3, 2006, pp. 230-247. doi:10.1287/mksc.1050.0175