Research ArticleOpen AccessGoogle Scholar indexed
Tensor-Centric Warfare III: Combat Dynamics with Delta-Strikes
Joint and Operations Analysis Division, Defence Science & Technology Group, Adelaide, Australia
Cyber and Electronic Warfare Division, Defence Science & Technology Group, Adelaide, Australia
Joint and Operations Analysis Division, Defence Science & Technology Group, Adelaide, Australia
- 1 Joint and Operations Analysis Division, Defence Science & Technology Group, Adelaide, Australia
- 2 Cyber and Electronic Warfare Division, Defence Science & Technology Group, Adelaide, Australia
- 3 Joint and Operations Analysis Division, Defence Science & Technology Group, Adelaide, Australia
Intelligent Control and Automation·Volume 09 (2018)·Pages 107–122·Published 16 November 2018·DOI10.4236/ica.2018.94009
Copy link · social · email
Abstract
This paper is the third part of the complex combat dynamics series, called tensor-centric warfare (for the first two parts, see [1] [2]). In the present paper, we extend the tensor combat model from [1] and [2] to model the dynamics of delta-strikes/missiles , which are temporally confined strong kinetic effects . The scenarios analyzed here include both deterministic and random delta-strikes which mimic single, multiple and continuous-time missile attacks. We also look at the bidirectional random strike as well as the general Hamilton-Langevin dynamics framework and provide an interpretation of the results obtained through simulation.
KeywordsTensor-Centric WarfareCombat Dynamics with Delta-Strikes/Missiles
- Ivancevic, V., Pourbeik, P. and Reid, D. (2018) Tensor-Centric Warfare I: Tensor Lanchester Equations. Intelligent Control and Automation, 9, 11-29. https://doi.org/10.4236/ica.2018.92002
- Ivancevic, V., Reid, D. and Pourbeik, P. (2018) Tensor-Centric Warfare II: Entropic Uncertainty Modeling. Intelligent Control and Automation, 9, 30-51. https://doi.org/10.4236/ica.2018.92003
- Pincombe, A.H. and Pincombe, B.M. (2003) A Markov Based Method for Military Analysis. Australian Society for Operations Research Bulletin, 22, 2-8,
- Pincombe, A.H. and Pincombe, B.M. (2007) Markov Modelling on the Effectiveness of Sanctions: A Case Study of the Falklands War. ANZIAM Journal, 48, 527-541. https://doi.org/10.21914/anziamj.v48i0.80
- Pincombe, A.H. and Pincombe, B.M. (2008) Tractable Approximations to Multistage Decisions in Air Defence Scenarios. ANZIAM Journal, 49, 273-288. https://doi.org/10.21914/anziamj.v49i0.349
- Pincombe, A.H., Pincombe, B.M. and Pearce, C.E.M. (2009) Putting the Art before the Force. ANZIAM Journal, 49, 482-496.
- Pincombe, A.H., Pincombe, B.M. and Pearce, C.E.M. (2009) A Simple Battle Model with Explanatory Power. ANZIAM Journal, 49, 497-511.
- Kosowski, L.R., Pincombe, A.H. and Pincombe, B.M. (2010) Irrelevance of the Fractal Dimension Term in the Fractal Attrition Equation, ANZIAM Journal, 52, 988-1008. https://doi.org/10.21914/anziamj.v52i0.3963
- Keane, T. (2011) Combat Modelling with Partial Differential Equations. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 35, 2723-2735. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2010.11.057
- Pincombe, B.M. and Pincombe, A.H. (2016) Mass Action Models of Falklands War Battles. ANZIAM Journal, 57, 235-252. https://doi.org/10.21914/anziamj.v57i0.10450
- Pincombe, A.H., Pincombe, B.M. and Pearce, C.E.M. (2016) Dispersed Combat as Mass Action with Finite Search. ANZIAM Journal, 57, 305-319. https://doi.org/10.21914/anziamj.v57i0.10447
- Millikan, J., Wong, M. and Grieger, D. (2013) Suppression of Dismounted Soldiers: towards Improving Dynamic Threat Assessment in Closed Loop Combat Simulations. In: Piantadosi, J., Anderssen, R.S. and Boland, J., Eds., 20th International Congress on Modelling and Simulation (MODSIM 2013), Adelaide, 2013, 1054-1060.
- Bowden, F.D.J., Pincombe, B.M. and Williams, P.B. (2015) Feasible Scenario Spaces: A New Way of Measuring Capability Impacts. In: Weber, T., McPhee, M.J. and Anderssen, R.S., Eds, 21st International Congress on Modelling and Simulation (MODSIM2015), Gold Coast, 2015, 836-842.