Research Status and Trends of Science and Technology Evaluation in China—Visual Analysis Based on Knowledge Mapping
- 1 Chengdu Aeronautic Polytechnic, Chengdu, China
- 2 Chengdu Aeronautic Polytechnic, Chengdu, China
Abstract
In order to understand the current status and future trends of China’s science and technology evaluation research, we use the visual analysis tool CiteSpace to use the source journals included in the Chinese social science citations from 1998-2019 as the data source, and evaluate the domestic science and technology evaluation papers from the number of publications, the co-occurrence of authors, Institutional co-occurrence and subject clustering are analyzed. The study found that: the total amount of literature in the field of domestic science and technology evaluation is showing an overall upward trend; a relatively obvious author cooperation network has been formed, but the core author group has not yet been formed; institutional cooperation clusters have appeared, but the cooperation between institutions is still relatively scattered; The research topics focus on three aspects: science and technology evaluation index system, evaluation method and evaluation system.
- Bian, Q.L. (2019) Evaluation of Agricultural Science and Technology and Its Problems and Suggestions. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 11, 278.
- Zhang, W. and Cheng, J. (2003) The Establishment and Standardization of Expert Support System for Science and Technology Evaluation. Science and Technology Management Research, 10, 31-33.
- Tong, P.Y. (2004) General Discussion on the Evaluation System of Agricultural Scientific Research. Economic Management of Agricultural Scientific Research, 2, 16-19.
- Zhao, R.Y., Wang, X., Wang, J.P., et al. (2019) Research Trends and Promotion Strategies of China’s Science and Technology Evaluation. Information Science, 11, 7-12.
- Liu, P.R. and Sun, R.Y. (2017) Current Situation Analysis and Countermeasures of Research on Public Opinion Guidance in My Country. Information Science, 8, 101-107.
- Luo, H.B. (1988) Summary of Science and Technology Evaluation. Science and Technology Management Research, 2, 23-25.
- Li, J., Chen, C.M. (2017) CiteSpace: Science and Technology Text Mining and Visualization (Second Edition). Capital University of Economics and Business Press, Beijing, 93.
- Chen, C. (2006) CiteSpace II: Detecting and Visualizing Emerging Trends and Transient Patterns in Scientific Literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 3, 357-377. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20317
- Chen, Y., Chen, C.M., Liu, Z.Y., et al. (2015) Methodological Function of CiteSpace Knowledge Graph. Research in Science of Science, 2, 242-253.
- Sun, Y. and Wang, X.W. (2018) Quantitative Analysis of China’s International Scientific Paper Output since the Reform and Opening Up: A Study Based on the Incites Database. Science of Science and Management of Science and Technology, 12, 46-53.
- Duan, H.B. (2013) Analysis of the Reform of Scientific Research Evaluation in Colleges and Universities Oriented by Talent Training. China Higher Education Research, 5, 74-77.
- Ye, L. (2019) Research on Scientific Research Evaluation Service of Foreign University Libraries. Journal of University Libraries, 1, 105-114.
- Shi, W.B. and Yang, H. (2014) Research on the Evaluation Methods of Teachers’ Scientific Research Performance in Colleges and Universities. Higher Education Exploration, 6, 112-117.
- Yu, L.P, Pan, Y.T. and Wu, Y.S. (2010) An Empirical Study on Preliminary Screening of Indicators in Science and Technology Evaluation. Science and Technology Progress and Policy, 5, 116-121.