Analysis of Research Directions in the Field of Library Intelligence from the Perspective of Altmetrics
- 1 Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing, China
- 2 Pujang College, Nanjing University of Technology, Nanjing, China
Abstract
With the continuous development of science and technology, the academic communication of many scholars slowly shifts to the web, and people’s academic communication in social media gradually increases. Traditional metrics have a certain one-sidedness in the evaluation of disciplinary literature and cannot evaluate the impact of literature on the web; while Altmetrics can count how literature is followed and utilized on the web, which is a complement to the traditional measurement methods. Therefore, it is necessary to evaluate the impact of academic literature based on Altmetrics, and combining it with traditional citation indicators can strengthen the credibility and objectivity of academic evaluation and promote better dissemination and communication of academic results. Against this research background, this paper combed through the most influential articles in the field of library and information science in recent years, analysed the literature on library intelligence in the WOS database, identified current research hotspots in the field of library and information science, and predicted potential research hotspots in the future. This study may provide a reference for the research and development of the discipline.
- Priem, J., Taraborelli, D., Groth, P. and Neylon, C. (2010) Altmetrics: A Manifesto. http://altmetrics.org/manifesto
- Tian, D.F. and Wei, R.B. (2018) Analysis of International Information Science and Librarianship Research Hotspots in 2017. Modern Intelligence, 38, 125-129.
- Liu, Y.S., Zhang, H.T.A., Xu, H.L., et al. (2019) Analysis of Research Hotspots and Frontiers in the Field of Librarianship and Information Science in Foreign Countries in the Past Three Years. Modern Intelligence, 39, 168-177.
- Zhao, R.Y. and Yu, B. (2019) Comparative Analysis of International Library Intelligence Research Hotspots in the Past Three Years. Intelligence Science, 37, 3-9.
- Wang, S.G., Bu, Y. and Zhang, G. (2017) Bibliometric and Content Analysis of Papers Related to Research Methods in the Field of Library and information science in China (1981-2015). Library Journal, 36, 4-13.
- Hu, L. (2018) An Analysis of the Current Situation and Hotspots of Domestic Library Intelligence Research from 2012-2016—An Econometric Analysis Based on 13 Core Chinese Graphical Journals. Library Work and Research, 2018, 67-76.
- Si, L., Chen, J.M., Ma, T.Y., et al. (2019) An Empirical Study on the Application and Evolution of Library Intelligence Research Methods in China in the Past Five Years—A Statistical Analysis Based on Five Journals. Library, 2019, 15-21.
- Chai, H. and Ruan, J.H. (2019) Analysis of the Current Status of Research in the Discipline of “Library, Intelligence and Archives Management” Based on the National Foundation Projects from 2013 to 2017. Intelligence Science, 37, 163-169.
- Zhao, R.H. (2019) Analysis of Research Hotspots and Development Trend of Librarianship in China—Statistics Based on the National Social Science Foundation Projects from 2015-2019. Librarianship Research, 2019, 2-9.
- Jarvelin, K. and Vakkari, P. (1993) The Evolution of Library and Information Science 1965-1985: A Content Analysis of Journal Articles. Information Processing & Management, 29, 129-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/0306-4573(93)90028-C
- Figuerola, C.G., Marco, F.J.G. and Pinto, M. (2017) Mapping the Evolution of Library and Information Science (1978-2014) Using Topic Modeling on LISA. Scientometrics, 112, 1507-1535. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2432-9
- García-Marco, F.-J., Figuerola, G.G. and Pinto, M. (2020) Analysis of the Thematic Evolution of Research on Information and Documentation in Spanish in the LISA Database Using Thematic Modeling (1978-2019). El Profesional de la Información, 29, 1-22.