Integrating Generative AI in Engineering Education: Interaction Dynamics and Pedagogical Implications
- 1 Polytechnic Department of Engineering and Architecture (DPIA), University of Udine, Udine, Italy
Abstract
Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming engineering education, particularly in activities involving product representation and conceptual design. While existing literature has extensively addressed students’ perceptions and the technical capabilities of AI systems, comparatively less attention has been devoted to the interaction processes that emerge during real educational tasks. This paper adopts a conceptual and educational perspective to examine how students interact with AI tools in design-oriented contexts. Building on insights from Human-Computer Interaction and design cognition, the study identifies recurring interaction tendencies and analyzes them through key dimensions such as goal formulation, interpretation of outputs, and distribution of agency between user and system. Rather than proposing a formal framework, the paper develops an extended conceptual discussion aimed at supporting pedagogical reflection, and outlines implications for teaching practices that promote reflective engagement and meaningful learning.
- Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., et al . (2023) ChatGPT for Good? On Opportunities and Challenges of Large Language Models for Education. Learning and Individual Differences , 103, Article 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274
- Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V.I., Bond, M. and Gouverneur, F. (2019) Systematic Review of Research on Artificial Intelligence Applications in Higher Education—Where Are the Educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education , 16, Article No. 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0
- Long, D. and Magerko, B. (2020) What Is AI Literacy? Competencies and Design Considerations. Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems , Honolulu, 25-30 April 2020, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376727
- Amershi, S., Weld, D., Vorvoreanu, M., Fourney, A., Nushi, B., Collisson, P., et al . (2019) Guidelines for Human-AI Interaction. Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems , Glasgow, 4-9 May 2019, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300233
- Shneiderman, B. (2022) Human-Centered AI. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1145/3538882.3542790
- Goldschmidt, G. (1991) The Dialectics of Sketching. Creativity Research Journal , 4, 123-143. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419109534381
- Schön, D.A. (1983) The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. Basic Books.
- Buxton, B. (2007) Sketching User Experiences: Getting the Design Right and the Right Design. Morgan Kaufmann.
- Gilpin, L.H., Bau, D., Yuan, B.Z., Bajwa, A., Specter, M. and Kagal, L. (2018) Explaining Explanations: An Overview of Interpretability of Machine Learning. 2018 IEEE 5th International Conference on Data Science and Advanced Analytics ( DSAA ), Turin, 1-3 October 2018, 80-89. https://doi.org/10.1109/dsaa.2018.00018
- Tholander, J. and Jonsson, M. (2023) Design Ideation with AI-Sketching, Thinking and Talking with Generative Machine Learning Models. Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference, Pittsburgh, 10-14 July 2023, 1930-1940. https://doi.org/10.1145/3563657.3596014
- Norman, D.A. (2013) The Design of Everyday Things. Revised and Expanded Edition, Basic Books.
- Holstein, K., McLaren, B.M. and Aleven, V. (2019) Designing for Complementarity: Teacher and Student Needs for Orchestration Support in AI-Enhanced Classrooms. In: Isotani, S., Millán, E., Ogan, A., Hastings, P., McLaren, B. and Luckin, R. Eds., Lecture Notes in Computer Science , Springer International Publishing, 157-171. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23204-7_14