Enterprise Architecture Ontology for Supply ChainMaintenance and Restoration of the Sikorsky’s UH-60 Helicopter
- 1 MIS and Decision Sciences, Eberly College of Business & Information Technology,Indiana University of Pennsylvania, Indiana County, Pennsylvania, USA
- 2 MIS and Decision Sciences, Eberly College of Business & Information Technology,Indiana University of Pennsylvania, Indiana County, Pennsylvania, USA
Abstract
Ontologies have emerged as an important tool in the Enterprise architecture discipline to provide the theoretical foundations for designing and representing the enterprise as a whole or a specific area or domain, in a scientific fashion. This paper examines the domain of maintenance, repair, and overhaul (MRO) of the Sikorsky UH-60 helicopter involving multiple enterprises, and represents it through an ontology using the OWL Language and Protégé tool. The resulting ontology gives a formal and unambiguous model/representation of the MRO domain that can be used by multiple parties to arrive at a common shared conceptualization of the MRO domain. The ontology is designed to be conformant to ISO 13030 or the Product Life Cycle Support Standard (PLCS) standard, hence representing the state of being as per this standard especially at the interfaces between enterprises while incorporating existing reality to the greatest possible extent within the enterprises. As a result the ontology can be used to design Information Systems (IS) and their interfaces in all enterprises engaged in MRO to alleviate some of the issues present in the MRO area and to support business intelligence efforts.
- J. J. George and J. A. Rodger, “Smart Data: Enterprise Performance Optimization Strategy,” John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, 2010.
- M. Gruninger and K. Atefi, “Ontologies to Support Process Integration in Enterprise Engineering,” Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory, Vol. 6, No. 4, 2000, pp. 381-394. doi:10.1023/A:1009610430261
- T.F. Meehan and A. M. Masci, “Logical Development of the Cell Ontology,” BMC Bioinformatics, Vol. 12, No. 1, 2011, p. 6. doi:10.1186/1471-2105-12-6
- W. Grassl, “The Reality of Brands: Towards an Ontology of Marketing,” The American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Vol. 58, No. 2, 1999, pp. 313-359.
- R. Westra, “Marxian Economic Theory and an Ontology of Socialism: A Japanese Intervention,” Capital & Class, Vol. 26, No. 3, 2002, pp. 61-85. doi:10.1177/030981680207800104
- T. Grubic and I. S. Fan, “Supply Chain Ontology: Review, Analysis and Synthesis,” Computers in Industry, Vol. 61, No. 8, 2010, pp. 776-786. doi:10.1016/j.compind.2010.05.006
- P. J. Clark and R. Thompson, “Exploiting a ThesaurusBased Semantic Net for Knowledge-Based Search,” 12th Conference on Innovative Applications of AI (AAAI/ IAAI’00), 2000. http://www.aaai.org/Papers/IAAI/2000/IAAI00-008.pdf
- A. Hunter, “Engineering Ontologies,” 2001.http://www.cs.ucl.ac.uk/staff/a.hunter/tradepress/eng.html
- M. Uschold, “Creating, Integrating and Maintaining Local and Global Ontologies,” First Workshop on Ontology Learning (OL-2000) in Conjunction with the 14th European Conference on Arti?cial Intelligence (ECAI 2000), Berlin, 2001.
- P. Hitzler and M. Kr?tzsch, “OWL 2 Web Ontology Language Primer,” 2012.http://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-primer/
- L. Miller and M. Bertus “License valuation in the Aerospace Industry: A Real Options Approach,” Review of Financial Economics, Vol. 14, No. 3-4, 2005, pp. 225239. doi:10.1016/j.rfe.2005.04.001
- Wikipedia, “Sikorsky UH-6,” 2012.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sikorsky_UH-60
- W. Anderson, “Logistics and Support Chain Management: An Aerospace Industry Perspective,” 5th Annual Executives Logistics Forum, University of North Texas, Denton, 2001
- C. Koblish, “MRO—Crisis or Cycle,” Maintenance, Repair, and Overhaul Conference Fort Lauderdale, McGraw Hill, New York, 2003.
- Standford, “Protégé,” 2012.Protege.standford.edu