An Exploratory Study on the Electronic Word of Mouth Communication in Promoting Brands in the Online Platforms
- 1 Department of Management Studies, Vels University, Chennai - 600 117, Tamil Nadu, India
- 2 Department of Management Studies, Vels University, Chennai - 600 117, Tamil Nadu, India
Abstract
This study discusses on the communication method followed by most of the brands called. “Electronic Word of Mouth” in a short form is called as eWOM in order to reach the customers effectively in a short span. Social media having become a new hybrid component of integrated marketing communication allows the brands to establish strong relationship with the customers. With the establishment of customer relationship online, the brands create a platform for the customers to discuss about the product features, quality, price and write a review about the product online. This research analyses about the social media and its impact in spreading the messages about the brands to the end customers and the impact of gender, age groups, income, designation and the demographic details of the customers in trusting the information that is spread through electronic media and the level at which the eWOM helps the customers to select the brand.
- Kaplan, A.M. and Haenlein, M. (2010) Users of the World, Unite! The Challenges and Opportunities of Social Media. Business Horizons, 53, 59-68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2009.09.003
- Hennig-Thurau, T. and Walsh, G. (2003) Electronic Word-of-Mouth: Motives for and Consequences of Reading Customer Articulations on the Internet. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 8, 51-74.
- Wang, Y. and Rodgers, S. (2011) Electronic Word of Mouth and Consumer Generated Content: From Concept to Application, Missouri School of Journalism, USA.
- Erkan, I. (2014) “Vine”: Do You Miss It? Electronic Word of Mouth on the Social Networking Site, Vine. International Journal of Business and Information, 9, 461-473.
- Facebook Statistics, Stats, & Facts for 2015. http://www.digitalbuzzblog.com
- Qiu, L.Y., Pang, J. and Lim, K.H. (2012) Effects of Conflicting Aggregated Rating on eWOM Review Credibility and Diagnosticity. Journal Decision Support Systems Archive, 54, 631-643.
- Bullas (2012) Significant Social Media Facts, Figures and Statistics Plus 7 Info Graphics.
- Anderson, Eric Social Media Marketing, Springer-Verlag Publications, 2, 48-50.
- Lehmann, W.S. (2015) The Influence of Electronic Word-of-Mouth (eWOM) on College Search and Choice. Open Access Dissertations, Paper 1378.
- Higgins, E.T. and Silberman, I. (1998) Development of Regulatory Focus: Promotion and Prevention as Ways of Living. In: Heckhausen, J. and Dweck, C.S., Eds., Motivation and Self-Regulation across the Life Span, Cambridge University Press, New York, 78-113. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511527869.005
- Cheunga, C.M.K. and Thadani, D.R. (2012) The Impact of Electronic Word-of-Mouth Communication: A Literature Analysis and Integrative Model. Decision Support Systems, 54, 461-470. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2012.06.008
- Ong, W.J. (1981) Fighting for Life: Contest, Sexuality, and Consciousness. Cornell University Press, Cornell.
- Tannen, D. (1990) You Just Don’t Understand: Women and Men in Conversation. William Morrow & Co Inc., USA.
- Kothari, C.R. (1990) Research Methodology: Methods and Techniques Wishwa. Prakashan, New Delhi.
- Slesinger, D. and Stephenson, M. (1930) The Encyclopaedia of Social Sciences. Vol. IX, MacMillan Publications.