An Interactive Expert System Based Decision Making Model for the Management of Transit System Alternate Fuel Vehicle Assets
- 1 Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA
- 2 Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA
- 3 Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA
Abstract
Traditionally, the process used by public transportation entities to determine the acquisition strategy for new vehicle asset is based upon a broad range of criteria. Vehicle cost has been cited as one of the more critical factors which decision makers consider. It is currently a common practice to consider other factors (life-cycle cost, fuel efficiency, vehicle reliability, environmental effects, etc.) that contribute to a more comprehensive approach. This study investigates the next generation of advancements in decision making tools in the area of the application of methods to quantify and manage uncertainty. In particular, the uncertainty comes from the public policy arena where future policy and regulations are not always based upon logical and predictable processes. The fleet decision making process in most governmental agencies is a very complex and interdependent activity. There are always competing forces and agendas within the view of the decision maker. Rarely is the decision maker a single person although, within the transit environment, there is often one person charged with the responsibility of fleet management. The focus of this research examines the decision making of the general transit agency community via the development of an expert systems prototype tool. A computer-based prototype system is developed which provide an expert knowledge-based recommendation, based upon variable user inputs. The results shown in this study show that a decision making tool for the management of transit system alternate fuel vehicle assets can be modeled and tested. The direct users of this research are the transit agency administrations. The results can be used by the management teams as a reliable input to inform their urban transit buses expansion decision making process.
- Laghaei, J., Faghri, A. and Li, M. (2015) Impacts of Home Shopping on Vehicle Operations and Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Multi-Year Regional Study. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 23, 381-391. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2015.1124471
- Wahed, M., Faghri, A. and Li, M. (2017) An Innovative Simulation Model for the Operations of a Multipurpose Seaport: A Case Study from Port of Wilmington, USA. International Journal of Simulation and Process Modelling.
- Fan, R.M., Zhu, B.-Z., Huang, C.-P., Sheng, Z.-G., Mao, L. and Li, M.-X. (2016) Different Modes of Synergistic Toxicities between Metam/Copper (II) and Metam/Zinc (II) in HepG2 Cells: Apoptosis vs. Necrosis. Environmental Toxicology, 31, 1964-1973. https://doi.org/10.1002/tox.22197
- Werpy, M.R., Burnham, A., Mintz, M. and Santini, D.J. (2010) Natural Gas Vehicles: Status, Barriers and Opportunities. Alexandria, VA, ANL/ESD/10-4. https://doi.org/10.2172/1000207
- Shahpar, A. (2010) Life-Cycle Cost and Emissions Assessment of Alternative Fuel Buses: A Case Study of the Delaware Authority for Regional Transit (DART). Newark, DE.
- Patil, A., Herder, P. and Brown, K. (2010) Investment Decision Making for Alternative Fuel Public Transport Buses: The Case of Brisbane Transport. Journal of Public Transportation, 13, 115-133. https://doi.org/10.5038/2375-0901.13.2.6
- Camerer, C. and Weber, M. (1992) Recent Developments in Modeling Preferences: Uncertainty and Ambiguity. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5, 325-370. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00122575
- Busenitz, L.W. and Barney, J.B. (1997) Differences between Entrepreneurs and Managers in Large Organizations: Biases and Heuristics in Strategic Decision-Making. Journal of Business Venturing, 12, 9-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(96)00003-1
- Reckhow, K.H. (1994) Importance of Scientific Uncertainty in Decision Making. Environmental Management, 18, 161-166. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02393758
- Ryan, F. and Caulfield, B. (2010) Examining the Benefits of Using Bio-CNG in Urban Bus Operations. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 15, 362-365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2010.04.002
- Zhang, L., Xu, W. and Li, M. (2009) Co-Evolution of Transportation and Land Use: Modeling Historical Dependencies in Land Use and Transportation Decision-Making.
- Taromi, R., DuRoss, M., Chen, B.T., Faghri, A., Li, M.X. and DeLiberty, T. (2015) A Multiobjective Land Development Optimization Model: The Case of New Castle County, Delaware. Transportation Planning and Technology, 38, 277-304. https://doi.org/10.1080/03081060.2014.997450