Predicting the Curvature of the Cosmos, and Point of Volume Contraction in a Big Bounce Scenario
- 1 Retired, Maine Maritime Academy, Castine, ME, USA
Abstract
Based on the latest Planck surveys, the universe is close to being remarkably flat, and yet, within observational error, there is still room for a slight curvature. If the curvature is positive, then this would lead to a closed universe, as well as allow for a big bounce scenario. Working within these assumptions, and using a simple model, we predict that the cosmos may have a positive curvature in the amount, Ω 0 =1.001802 , a value within current observational bounds. For the scaling laws associated with the density parameters in Friedmann’s equations, we will assume a susceptibility model for space, where, , equals the smeared cosmic susceptibility. If we allow the to decrease with increasing cosmic scale parameter, “ a ”, then we can predict a maximum Hubble volume, with minimum CMB temperature for the voids, before contraction begins, as well as a minimum volume, with maximum CMB temperature, when expansion starts. A specific heat engine model for the cosmos is also entertained for this model of a closed universe.
- Steinhardt, P. and Ijjas, A. (2018) Bouncing Cosmology Made Simple. Classical and Quantum Gravity, 35, 135004. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6382/aac482
- Steinhardt, P. and Ijjas, A. (2016) Implications of Planck2015 for Inflationary, Ekpyrotic and Anamorphic Bouncing Cosmologies. Classical and Quantum Gravity, 33, 044001. https://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/33/4/044001
- Matsui, H., Takahashi, F. and Terada, T. (2019) Bouncing Universe from Nothing. Physics Letters B, 795, 152-159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2019.06.013
- Ijjas, A. and Steinhardt, P. (2017) Fully Stable Cosmological Solutions with a Non-Singular Classical Bounce. Physics Letters B, 764, 289-294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2016.11.047
- Ijjas, A. and Steinhardt, P. (2016) Classically Stable Nonsingular Cosmological Bounces. Physical Review Letters, 117, 121304. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.121304
- Brandenberger, R. and Peter, P. (2017) Bouncing Cosmologies: Progress and Problems. Foundations of Physics, 47, 797-850. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-016-0057-0
- Novello, M. and Bergliaffa, S.E.P. (2008) Bouncing Cosmologies. Physics Reports, 463, 127-213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2008.04.006
- Battefeld, D. and Peter, P. (2015) A Critical Review of Classical Bouncing Cosmologies. Physics Reports, 571, 1-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2014.12.004
- Khoury, J., Ovrut, B.A., Steinhardt, P.J. and Turok, N. (2001) The Ekpyrotic Universe: Colliding Branes and the Origin of the Hot Big Bang. Physical Review D, 64, 123522. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.64.123522
- Buchbinder, E.I., Khoury, J. and Ovrut, B.A. (2008) Non-Gaussianities in New Ekpyrotic Cosmology. Physical Review Letters, 100, 171302. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.171302
- Graham, P.W., Kaplan, D.E. and Rajendran, S. (2018) Relaxation of the Cosmological Constant. Physical Review D, 97, Article ID: 044003.
- Levy, A.M., Ijjas, A. and Steinhardt, P.J. (2015) Scale-Invariant Perturbations in Ekpyrotic Cosmologies without Fine-Tuning of Initial Conditions. Physical Review D, 92, 063524. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.92.063524
- Levy, A.M. (2017) Fine-Tuning Challenges for the Matter Bounce Scenario. Physical Review D, 95, 023522. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.95.023522
- Pilot, C. (2018) Modeling Cosmic Expansion, and Possible Inflation, as a Thermodynamic Heat Engine. Zeitschrift fuer Naturforschung A, 74, 1-10. https://arxiv.org/abs/1705.04743