Melatonin for Pre- and Postoperative Pain and Anxiety: A Cancelled Clinical Trial
- 1 Center for Perioperative Optimization, Department of Surgery, Herlev and Gentofte Hospitals, University of Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark
- 2 Center for Perioperative Optimization, Department of Surgery, Herlev and Gentofte Hospitals, University of Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark
- 3 Center for Perioperative Optimization, Department of Surgery, Herlev and Gentofte Hospitals, University of Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark
- 4 Center for Perioperative Optimization, Department of Surgery, Herlev and Gentofte Hospitals, University of Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark
- 5 Center for Perioperative Optimization, Department of Surgery, Herlev and Gentofte Hospitals, University of Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark
- 6 Center for Perioperative Optimization, Department of Surgery, Herlev and Gentofte Hospitals, University of Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark
Abstract
Designing and completing clinical intervention trials can be challenging. Many aspects must be considered to ensure that patients who fulfill the inclusion criteria for the intervention are identified and recruited effectively. The aim of this paper was to disseminate the results of a cancelled trial and present unpredictable barriers met underway, so future researchers can learn from these. The trial examined perioperative analgesic and anxiolytic effects of melatonin. It was registered at https://clinicaltrials.gov/ (NCT02386319) and a study protocol was published a priori. Participants were recruited from the plastic surgery ward of a Danish private hospital. The intended sample size of the trial was 72 patients based on power calculations of the outcome measures. During the six-month recruitment period, six patients were included, with only three completing the trial. Unpredictable barriers were poor communication between investigators and facility staff, lack of access to booking and operation schedules at the recruitment facility, the patient group being unwilling to participate, and the timing of recruitment conversations being unsuited as patients often did not have time to talk to the investigators. Too few data were collected to make any meaningful statistical analyses. Our trial was cancelled prematurely because of unpredictable barriers after commencing recruitment. Considering these barriers when designing a clinical trial may help future researchers avoid cancelling trials. Transparency of research is important and even prematurely cancelled trials should publish their findings.
- Hariton, E. and Locascio, J.J. (2018) Randomised Controlled Trials—The Gold Standard for Effectiveness Research. BJOG, 125, 1716. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.15199
- Varse, F., Janani, L., Moradi, Y., Solaymani-Dodaran, M., Baradaran, H.R. and Rimaz, S. (2019) Challenges in the Design, Conduct, Analysis, and Reporting in Randomized Clinical Trial Studies: A Systematic Review. Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran, 33, 37. https://doi.org/10.47176/mjiri.33.37
- McDonald, A.M., Knight, R.C., Campbell, M.K., Entwistle, V.A., Grant, A.M., Cook, J.A., et al. (2009) What Influences Recruitment to Randomised Controlled Trials? A Review of Trials Funded by Two UK Funding Agencies. Trials, 7, 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-7-9
- Thoma, A., Farrokhyar, F., McKnight, L. and Bhandari, M. (2010) Practical Tips for Surgical Research: How to Optimize Patient Recruitment. Canadian Journal of Surgery, 53, 205-210.
- Vijayananthan, A. and Nawawi, O. (2008) The Importance of Good Clinical Practice Guidelines and Its Role in Clinical Trials. The Biomedical Imaging and Intervention Journal, 4, e5. https://doi.org/10.2349/biij.4.1.e5
- Guideline for Good Clinical Practice E6(R2). https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/scientific-guideline/ich-e-6-r2-guideline-good-clinical-practice-step-5_en.pdf
- Grimes, D.A., Hubacher, D., Nanda, K., Schulz, K.F., Moher, D. and Altman, D.G. (2005) The Good Clinical Practice Guideline: A Bronze Standard for Clinical Research. The Lancet, 366, 172-174. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66875-4
- Mentz, R.J., Hernandez, A.F., Berdan, L.G., Rorick, T., O’Brien, E.C., Ibarra, J.C., et al. (2016) Good Clinical Practice Guidance and Pragmatic Clinical Trials: Balancing the Best of Both Worlds. Circulation, 133, 872-880. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.019902
- Srinivasan, V., Pandi-Perumal, S.R., Spence, D.W., Moscovitch, A., Trakht, I., Brown, G.M., et al. (2010) Potential Use of Melatonergic Drugs in Analgesia: Mechanisms of Action. Brain Research Bulletin, 81, 362-371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresbull.2009.12.001
- Ochoa-Sanchez, R., Rainer, Q., Comai, S., Spadoni, G., Bedini, A., Rivara, S., et al. (2012) Anxiolytic Effects of the Melatonin MT2 Receptor Partial Agonist UCM765: Comparison with Melatonin and Diazepam. Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology & Biological Psychiatry, 39, 318-325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnpbp.2012.07.003
- Kollerup Madsen, B., Zetner, D. andersen, L.P.K. and Rosenberg, J. (2019) The Anxiolytic and Analgesic Effects of Melatonin: A Study Protocol for a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study. Melatonin Research, 2, 22-34. https://doi.org/10.32794/mr11250019