Optimal Grip Span for Measuring Maximum Handgrip Strength in Preschool Children
- 1 Graduate School of Health and Sports Science & Institute of Health and Sports Science and Medicine, Juntendo University, Inzai-shi, Chiba, Japan
- 2 Division of Children’s Health and Exercise Research, Institute of Trainology, Fukuoka-shi, Fukuoka, Japan
- 3 Child Health Research Group, Atagohama Kindergarten, Fukuoka-shi, Fukuoka, Japan
- 4 Child Health Research Group, Atagohama Kindergarten, Fukuoka-shi, Fukuoka, Japan
- 5 Child Health Research Group, Atagohama Kindergarten, Fukuoka-shi, Fukuoka, Japan
- 6 Child Health Research Group, Atagohama Kindergarten, Fukuoka-shi, Fukuoka, Japan
- 7 Department of Health, Exercise Science, and Recreation Management, Kevser Ermin Applied Physiology Laboratory, The University of Mississippi, University, MS, USA
- 8 Department of Health, Exercise Science, and Recreation Management, Kevser Ermin Applied Physiology Laboratory, The University of Mississippi, University, MS, USA
Abstract
Background: Since the minimum grip span of a standard Smedley hand dynamometer is 4 cm, the handgrip strength (HGS) value at a less than 4 cm grip span has not been reported. Objective: The present study examined the impact of grip span on handgrip strength (HGS) in young children using a dynamometer ranging from 2 to 4.5 cm of grip span. Methods: A total of 93 (39 girls and 54 boys) children were recruited from a local kindergarten with the cooperation of their parents. Each participant performed one test trial and then five maximal trials using different grip spans (2.0, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, and 4.5 cm) in random order and allowing a 1-minute rest between measures. Results: There was a statistically significant difference in HGS depending on which grip span was used, χ 2 (4) = 211.5 (p < 0.001). Mean ranks were 1.03, 2.79, 3.72, 3.94, and 3.53 for 2 cm, 3 cm, 3.5 cm, 4 cm, and 4.5 cm, respectively. Follow-up tests found statistically significant differences between each grip span comparison except for the 3.5 cm vs. 4.0 cm comparison (p = 0.166) and the 3.5 cm vs. 4.5 cm comparison (p = 0.611). Our finding showed that the highest HGS appeared at a grip span of 4.0 cm. In addition, the difference between HGS at a grip span of 4.0 cm and 3.5 cm or a grip span of 4.0 cm and 4.5 cm was statistically different but relatively small. Conclusion: Our results recommended that the target grip span for measuring maximal HGS in young children is about 4 cm (4 ± 0.5 cm).
- Neu, C.M., Rauch, F., Rittweger, J., Manz, F. and Schoenau, E. (2002) Influence of Puberty on Muscle Development at the Forearm. American Journal of Physiology Endocrinology Metabolism, 283, E103-E107. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpendo.00445.2001
- Ozaki, H., Abe, T., Dankel, S.J., Loenneke, J.P., Natsume, T., Deng, P. and Naito, H. (2020) The Measurement of Strength in Children: Is the Peak Value Truly Maximal? Children (Basel), 8, Article No. 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/children8010009
- Abe, A., Sanui, R., Loenneke, J.P. and Abe, T. (2022) Is the Peak Value Truly Maximal When Measuring Strength in Young Children? Journal of Trainology, 11, 17-21. https://doi.org/10.17338/trainology.11.2_17
- Ortega, F.B., Cadenas-Sanchez, C., Sanchez-Delgado, G., Mora-Gonzalez, J., Martinez-Tellez, B., Artero, E.G., Castro-Pinero, J., Labayen, I., Chillon, P., Lof, M. and Ruiz, J.R. (2015) Systematic Review and Proposal of a Field-Based Physical Fitness-Test Battery in Preschool Children: The PREFIT Battery. Sports Medicine, 45, 533-555. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-014-0281-8
- Butterfield, S.A., Lehnhard, R.A., Loovis, E.M., Coladarci, T. and Saucier, D. (2009) Grip Strength Performance by 5- to 19-Year-Old. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 109, 362-370. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.109.2.362-370
- Ramirez-Velez, R., Rincon-Pabon, D., Correa-Bautista, J.E., Garcia-Hermoso, A. and Izquierdo, M. (2021) Handgrip Strength: Normative Reference Values in Males and Females Aged 6-64 Years Old in a Colombian Population. Clinical Nutrition ESPEN, 44, 379-386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnesp.2021.05.009
- Shetty, M., Balasundaran, S. and Mullerpatan, R. (2019) Grip and Pinch Strength: Reference Values for Children and Adolescents from India. Journal of Pediatric Rehabilitation Medicine, 12, 255-262. https://doi.org/10.3233/PRM-180580
- Giampaoli, S., Ferrucci, L., Cecchi, F., Lo Noce, C., Poce, A., Dima, F., Santaquilani, A., Vescio, M.F. and Menotti, A. (1999) Hand-Grip Strength Predicts Incident Disability in Non-Disabled Older Men. Age and Ageing, 28, 283-288. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/28.3.283
- Li, S., Zhang, R., Pan, G., Zheng, L. and Li, C. (2018) Handgrip Strength Is Associated with Insulin Resistance and Glucose Metabolism in Adolescents: Evidence from National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2011 to 2014. Pediatric Diabetes, 19, 375-380. https://doi.org/10.1111/pedi.12596
- Rantanen, T., Guralnik, J.M., Foley, D., Masaki, K., Leveille, S., Curb, J.D. and White, L. (1999) Midlife Hand Grip Strength as a Predictor of Old Age Disability. JAMA, 281, 558-560. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.281.6.558