Utilization and Uptake of the UpToDate Clinical Decision Support Tool in Five Medical Schools in Uganda (August 2022-August 2023): A Partnership with the Better Evidence Program
- 1 Sir Albert Cook Medical Library, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda
- 2 Faculty of Health Sciences, Busitema University, Mbale, Uganda
- 3 Sir Albert Cook Medical Library, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda
- 4 Faculty of Medicine, Mbarara University of Science and Technology Library, Mbarara, Uganda
- 5 School of Medicine Library, Kabale University, Kabale, Uganda
- 6 Faculty of Medicine Library, Gulu University, Gulu, Uganda
- 7 The Global Health Delivery Project at Harvard and Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, USA
Abstract
Backg round: Clinical decision support tools provide suggestions to support healthcare providers and clinicians, as they attend to patients. Clinicians use these tools to rapidly consult the evidence at the point of care, a practice which has been found to reduce the time patients spend in hospitals, promote the quality of care and improve healthcare outcomes. Such tools include Medscape, VisualDx, Clinical Key, DynaMed, BMJ Best Practice and UpToDate. However, use of such tools has not yet been fully embraced in low-resource settings such as Uganda. Objective: This paper intends to collate data on the use and uptake of one such tool, UpToDate, which was provided at no cost to five medical schools in Uganda. Methods: Free access to UpToDate was granted through the IP addresses of five medical schools in Uganda in collaboration with Better Evidence at The Global Health Delivery Project at Harvard and Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Wolters Kluwer Health. Following the donation, medical librarians in the respective institutions conducted training sessions and created awareness of the tool. Usage data was aggregated, based on logins and content views, presented and analyzed using Excel tables and graphs. Results: The data shows similar trends in increased usage over the period of August 2022 to August 2023 across the five medical schools. The most common topics viewed, mode of access (using either the computer or the mobile app), total usage by institution, ratio of uses to eligible users by institution and ratio of uses to students by institution are shared. Conclusion: The study revealed that the tool was used by various user categories across the institutions with similar steady improved usage over the year. These results can inform the librarians as they encourage their respective institutions to continue using the tool to support uptake of point-of-care tools in clinical practice.
- Rosenberg, J., Miller, K., Pickard, O., Henrich, N., Karlage, A. and Weintraub, R. (2022) Barriers and Facilitators to Use of a Digital Clinical Decision Support Tool: A Cohort Study Combining Clickstream and Survey Data. BMJ Open , 12, e064952. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064952
- Annet Kinengyere, A., Rosenberg, J., Pickard, O. and Kamya, M. (2021) Utilization and Uptake of the Uptodate Clinical Decision Support Tool at the Makerere University College of Health Sciences (Makchs), Uganda. African Health Sciences , 21, 904-911. https://doi.org/10.4314/ahs.v21i2.52
- Peterson, M.W., Rowat, J., Kreiter, C. and Mandel, J. (2004) Medical Students’ Use of Information Resources: Is the Digital Age Dawning? Academic Medicine , 79, 89-95. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-200401000-00019
- Valtis, Y.K., Rosenberg, J.D., Wachter, K., Kisenge, R., Mashili, F., Chande Mallya, R., et al . (2019) Better Evidence: Prospective Cohort Study Assessing the Utility of an Evidence-Based Clinical Resource at the University of Rwanda. BMJ Open , 9, e026947. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026947
- Valtis, Y.K., Rosenberg, J., Bhandari, S., Wachter, K., Teichman, M., Beauvais, S., et al . (2016) Evidence-based Medicine for All: What We Can Learn from a Programme Providing Free Access to an Online Clinical Resource to Health Workers in Resource-Limited Settings. BMJ Global Health , 1, e000041. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2016-000041
- Wolters Kluwer (2024) Making a Difference for Medical Providers and Students Who serve Vulnerable Populations. https://www.wolterskluwer.com/en/solutions/uptodate/about/donations-program
- UpToDate Research Studies. https://www.wolterskluwer.com/en/solutions/uptodate/about/research
- Bonis, P., Pickens, G., Rind, D. and Foster, D. (2008) Association of a Clinical Knowledge Support System with Improved Patient Safety, Reduced Complications and Shorter Length of Stay among Medicare Beneficiaries in Acute Care Hospitals in the United States. International Journal of Medical Informatics , 77, 745-753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2008.04.002
- Low, S. and Lim, T. (2012) Utility of the Electronic Information Resource UpToDate for Clinical Decision-Making at Bedside Rounds. Singapore Medical Journal , 53, 116-120.
- Wolters Kluwer: Mobile Access to UpToDate. https://www.wolterskluwer.com/en/solutions/uptodate/uptodate/mobile
- Better Evidence (2024) Supporting Health Workers to Make the Best Decisions When and Where It Matters Most. https://www.ariadnelabs.org/better-evidence/