Rethinking an Algorithm: The Utility of the Techinicium 99 m Labeled Red Cell (RBC) Scanning for Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding (LGIB)
- 1 Division of Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Cooper University Hospital, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, Camden, USA
- 2 Mulica Hill Medical Associates, Mullica Hill, USA
- 3 Division of Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Cooper University Hospital, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, Camden, USA
- 4 Division of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Cooper University Hospital, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, Camden, USA
- 5 Division of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Cooper University Hospital, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, Camden, USA
Abstract
Purpose: Technetium 99 m (99 m Tc) labeled scan is often done to localize bleeding to facilitate treatment. No level 1 or 2 data supports this approach. The aim of this study was to determine the correlation between site of bleeding by nuclear scan and findings at surgery, angiogram or colonoscopy. Methods: Records of patients admitted to Cooper University Hospital from January 2001-December 2005 with LGIB who had 99mTc scan were analyzed. Results: 164 of 170 patients were eligible to be evaluated. There were 45 positive (27.5%) and 119 negative scans (72.5%). 21 of 45 patients with positive scans had angiography. 7 patients (33.3%) had positive and 14 (66.6%) negative angiograms. In 6 patients (85.7%) with (+) angiograms, there was correlation on the area of bleed as seen on the 99 m Tc scan (p = 0.125). 20 patients, in the positive scan group, required surgery. In 15 (75%) the findings at surgery correlated with the scan result (p = 0.04). 31 patients (68.8%) with positive scan had colonoscopy. There was correlation in 27 patients (87.0%) (p < 0.001). The patients with (+) scan received a total of 372 (8.2 per patient) transfusions of packed red blood cells (PRBC) compared to 333 (2.7 per patients) transfusions in patients with (–) scans. Surgeons documented in 7 patients that the result of scan influenced surgery. Patients with (+) and (–) scans had similar rates of colonoscopy (73.35% vs 76.4%), hospital length of stay (14.3 vs 12.10 days), while mortality rate was (8.8% vs 6.72%) respectively, Conclusion: 99 m Tc scan has low yield in the evaluation of LGIB. However when positive, they tend to correlate with findings at angiogram, surgery and colonoscopy.
- J. J. Farrell and L. S. Friedman, “Gastrointestinal Bleeding in the Elderly,” Gastroenterology Clinics of North America, Vol. 30, No. 2, 2001, pp. 377-407. doi:10.1016/S0889-8553(05)70187-4
- A. S. Fauci, E. Braunwald, D. L. Kasper, et al., “Harrison’s Principles of Internal Meidcine,” 17th Edition, McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., New York, 2008.
- T. E. Garofalo and R. A. Abdu, “Accuracy and Efficacy of Nuclear Scintigraphy for the Detection of Gastroin-testinal Bleeding,” Archives of Surgery, Vol. 132, No. 2, 1997, pp. 196-199. doi:10.1001/archsurg.1997.01430260094020
- M. S. Suzman, M. Talmor, et al., “Accurate Localization and Surgical Management of Active Lower Gastroin-testinal Hemorrhage with Technetium-Labeled Erythrocyte Scintigraphy,” Annals of Surgery, Vol. 226, No. 1, 1997, pp. 112-113.
- R. Levy, W. Barto and J. Gani, “Retrospective Study of the Utility of Nuclear Scintigraphic-Labeled Red Cell Scanning for Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding,” Annals of Surgery, Vol. 73, 2003, pp. 205-220. doi:10.1046/j.1445-1433.2002.02567.x
- D. A. Zukerman, T. P. Bocchini and E. H. Birnbaum, “Massive Hemorrhage in the Lower Gastrointestinal Tract in Adults: Diagnostic Imaging and Intervention,” American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol. 161, No. 4, 1993, pp. 703-711.
- J. M. Hunter and M. E. Pezim, “Limited Value of Technetium 99 m-Labeled Red Cell Scintigraphy in Localization of Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding,” American Journal of Surgery, Vol. 159, No. 5, 1990, pp. 504-506. doi:10.1016/S0002-9610(05)81256-5
- G. R. Voeller, G. Bunch and L. G. Britt, “Use of Technetium-Labeled Red Blood Cell Scintigraphy in the Detection and Management of Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage,” Surgery, Vol. 110, No. 4, 1991, pp. 799-804.
- P. V. Ford, S. P. Bartold, D. M. Fink-Bennett, et al., “Procedure Guideline for Gastrointestinal Bleeding and Meckel’s Diverticulum Scintigraphy. Society of Nuclear Medicine,” Journal of Nuclear Medicine, Vol. 40, No. 7, 1999, pp. 1226-1232.
- A. T. Hirsch, Z. J. Kaskal, C. W. Hertzer, et al., “ACC/AHA 2005 Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Peripheral Arterial Disease (Lower Extremity, Renal, Mesenteric, and Abdominal Aortic): A Collaborative Report from the American Association for Vascular Surgery/Society for Vascular Surgery, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society for Vascular Medicine and Biology, Society of Interventional Radiology, and the ACC/AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee