Fast Track Gynaecologic Surgery in the Overweight and Obese Patient
- 1
- 2
- 3
Abstract
Introduction: To review the outcomes of overweight and obese patients undergoing laparotomy and managed with a Fast Track Surgical (FTS) protocol. Methods: Between January 2008 and May 2010 patients having a laparotomy and managed on a FTS protocol were identified. They were compared to patients with a normal body mass index (BMI). Data was collected in a real time fashion and analysis undertaken in a retrospective fashion. Results: 194 patients were identified, 94 (48.4%) classified as normal BMI, 51 (26.3%) as overweight and 49 (25.3%) as obese. A vertical midline incision was performed in 170 (88%) patients. When comparing the group of overweight/obese patients (n = 100) to those with a normal BMI (n = 94) there was no significant difference in the number of benign or malignant pathologies, FIGO stage, age, insurance status, complexity of surgery, operation duration, blood loss, haemoglobin change, or need for transfusion. The proportion of patients successfully fast tracked and able to tolerate early oral feeding was similar. Patients classified as overweight or obese were significantly more likely to have a poorer performance status, have un¬dergone vertical midline incision and to have had COX II inhibitors withheld. The median length of stay (LOS) was 3 days for the patients with a normal BMI and also 3 days for those overweight or obese. Conclusions: Overweight and obese patients undergoing a fast track surgical protocol after laparotomy for gynaecological surgery have similar out comes when compared to patients of normal body mass index.
- Commonwealth of Australia, “Australia: The Healthiest Country by 2020,” Technical Report 1. Obesity in Australia: a need for urgent action, Vol. 4, July 2009, pp. 21-128.
- World Health Organisation, “Obesity and overweight,” Fact Sheet, No. 311, September 2006, pp. 1-3.
- B. Anderson, J. P. Connor, J. I. Andrews, C. S. Davis, R. E. Buller and J. I. Sorosky et al., “Obesity and prognosis in endometrial cancer,” Am J Obstet Gynecol,. Vol. 174, No. 4, April 1996, pp. 1171-1178.
- A. Pellegrino, M. Signorelli, R. Fruscio, A. Villa, A. Buda and P. Beretta, et al., “Feasibility and morbidity of total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with or without pelvic lymphadenectomy in obese women with stage I endometrial cancer,” Arch Gynecol Obstet, Vol. 279, No. 5, May 2009, pp. 655-660.
- C. P. Delaney, M. Zutshi, A. J. Senagore, F.H. Remzi, J. Hammel and V. W. Fazio, “Prospective, randomized, controlled trial between a pathway of controlled rehabilitation with early ambulation and diet and traditional postoperative care after laparotomy and intestinal resection,” Disease of Colon Rectum, Vol. 46, No. 7, July 2003, pp. 851-859.
- C. Eskicioglu, S. S. Forbes, M. A. Aarts, A. Okrainec and R. S. McLeod, “Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs for patients having colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized trials,” Journal of Gastrointestional Surgery, Vol. 13, No. 12, December 2009, pp. 2321-2329.
- H. Kehlet, “Principles of fast track surgery. Multimodal perioperative therapy programme,” Chirurg, Vol. ;80, No. 8, August 2009, pp. 687-689.
- H. Kehlet and D. W, “Wilmore Evidence-based surgical care and the evolution of fast-track surgery,” Annals Surgery, Vol. 248, No. 2, August 2008, pp. 189-98.
- D. Wilmore and H. Kehlet, “Recent advances. Management of patients in fast track surgery,” British Medical Journal, Vol. 322, 2001, pp. 473-476.
- N. Chopin, J. M. Malaret, M. C. Lafay-Pillet, A. Fotso, H. Foulot, C. Chapron, “Total laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign uterine pathologies: obesity does not increase the risk of complications,” Human Reproduction, Vol. 24, No. 12, December 2009, pp. 3057-3062.
- J. G. McDonnell, B. O. Donnell, G. Curley, A. Heffernan, C. Power and J, G. Laffey, “The Analgesic Efficacy of Transversus Abdominis Plane Block After Abdominal Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial,” Anesthesia and Analgesia, Vol. 104, No. 1, January 2007, pp. 193-197.