Video-Assisted Anterior Retroperitoneal Approach to the Lumbar Spine. A Minimal Invasive Technique Improved by the Use of Endoscopic Camera to Treat Lumbar Spine Diseases
- 1 IRCCS Galeazzi Orthopedic Institute, Milan, Italy
- 2 IRCCS Galeazzi Orthopedic Institute, Milan, Italy
- 3 Department of Neurosurgery and Gamma Knife Radiosurgery, San Raffaele Hospital, Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy
- 4 IRCCS Galeazzi Orthopedic Institute, Milan, Italy
- 5 IRCCS Galeazzi Orthopedic Institute, Milan, Italy
Abstract
The anterior retroperitoneal approach is a technique to treat disc degenerative disease (DDD), spinal deformities, traumas, tumors and infections. It can be used to perform Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusions (ALIF) or Total Disc Replacements (TDR). Though being a fast procedure that is becoming more often used by spinal surgeons, the anterior approach requires an adequate knowledge of the anatomy of the abdomen to lessen the risks of intraoperative complications. The authors’ preferred technique is the left retroperitoneal video-assisted approach, using an endoscope to visualize and magnify the deep anatomical structures, discectomy procedure and hardware implant. In a review of our casuistry from 2010 to 2012, 163 patients underwent an anterior lumbar approach, and 139 of these had a single L4-5 or L5-S1 level treatment. A 3.6% rate of global complications (1.44% of major vascular injuries) has been observed, with a mean operation time of 116.4 minutes and a mean blood loss of 156.1 ml. These values show how the anterior retroperitoneal video-assisted approach for the treatment of lumbar diseases is a fast procedure that implies low blood loss, with a low rate of intraoperative complications.
- Bassani, R., Sinigaglia, A. and Lamartina, C. (2001) Video-Assisted Minimally Invasive Lumbartotal Disc Replacement. European Spine Journal, 20, 2282-2283. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00586-011-2077-y
- Edgard-Rosa, G., Geneste, G., Nègre, G. and Marnay, T. (2012) Midline Anterior Approach from the Right Side to the Lumbar Spine for Interbody Fusion and Total Disc Replacement. Spine, 37, E562-E569. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/brs.0b013e31823a0a87
- Nicolas, T.A., Yantzer, B.K., Alameda, S., Johnson, W.M. and Guiot, B.H. (2007) Augmentation of an Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion with an Anteriorplate or Pedicle Screw Fixation: A Comparative Biomechanical in Vitro Study. Journal of Neurosurgery Spine, 6, 267-271. http://dx.doi.org/10.3171/spi.2007.6.3.267
- Fantini, G.A., Pappou, I.P., Girardi, F.P., Sandhu, H.S. and Cammisa Jr., F.P. (2007) Major Vascular Injury during Anterior Lumbar Spinal Surgery. Incidence, Risk Factors, and Management. Spine, 32, 2751-2758. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31815a996e
- Brau, S.A., Delamarter, R.B., Schiffman, M.L., Williams, L.A. and Watkins, R.G. (2004) Vascular Injury during Anterior Lumbar Surgery. Spine Journal, 4, 409-412. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2003.12.003
- Kulkarni, S.S., Lowery, G.L., Ross, R.E., Ravi Sankar, K. and Lykomitros, V. (2003) Arterial Complications Following Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Report of Eight Cases. European Spine Journal, 12, 48.
- Gumbs, A.A., Shah, R.V., Yue, J.J. and Sumpio, B. (2005) The Open Anterior Paramedian Retroperitoneal Approach for Spine Procedures. Archives of Surgery, 140, 339-343. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.140.4.339
- Fritzell, P., Hägg, O. and Nordwall, A. (2003) Complications in Lumbar Fusion Surgery for Chronic Low Back Pain: Comparison of Three Surgical Techniques Used in a Prospective Randomized Study. A Report from the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group. European Spine Journal, 12, 178-189.
- Holt, R.T., Majd, M.E., Vadhva, M. and Castro, F.P. (2003) The Efficacy of Anterior Spine Exposure by an Orthopedic Surgeon. Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques, 16, 477-486. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00024720-200310000-00007
- Kaiser, M.G., Haid, R.W., Subach, B.R., Miller, J.S., Smith, C.D. and Rodts, G.E. (2002) Comparison of the Mini Open versus Laparoscopic Approach for Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Retrospective Review. Neurosurgery, 51, 97-103. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00006123-200207000-00015