The Influence of Sound Deprivation on Audiologic Outcomes after Cochlear Implantation — Oak Academic Publishing
Research ArticleOpen AccessGoogle Scholar indexed
The Influence of Sound Deprivation on Audiologic Outcomes after Cochlear Implantation
Department of Ophthalmology, Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo (FMRP-USP), Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil
,
Department of Ophthalmology, Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo (FMRP-USP), Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil
,
Department of Ophthalmology, Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo (FMRP-USP), Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil
,
Department of Ophthalmology, Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo (FMRP-USP), Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil
,
Department of Ophthalmology, Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo (FMRP-USP), Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil
,
Department of Ophthalmology, Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo (FMRP-USP), Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil
1 Department of Ophthalmology, Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo (FMRP-USP), Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil
2 Department of Ophthalmology, Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo (FMRP-USP), Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil
3 Department of Ophthalmology, Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo (FMRP-USP), Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil
4 Department of Ophthalmology, Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo (FMRP-USP), Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil
5 Department of Ophthalmology, Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo (FMRP-USP), Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil
6 Department of Ophthalmology, Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo (FMRP-USP), Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil
The cochlear implant is a prosthesis that is capable to replace listening capability among patients with sensorineural hearing loss. Many studies suggest a negative relationship among duration of sound deprivation and audiometric gain (by means of speech perception test) after cochlear implantation. We evaluated surgical and audiologic results among post-lingual deafened adults, in different times of sound deprivation, and correlated with social isolation, presence of vertigo or tinnitus, and the speech therapy yield, between pre- and post-operative stages. A retrospective study was conducted on patients with post-lingual hearing loss, aged over 18 years old who underwent cochlear implant surgery in a public hospital from 2004 to 2014. Audiological, socio-demographic questionnaire, and manifestations of vertigo and tinnitus, during pre- and post-operative stages, were compared and correlating to the different periods of sound deprivation. Two groups were studied. The group A was composed of 38 participants (14 male and 24 female) with sound deprivation of less than 10 years; and group B was composed of 17 participants (8 male and 9 female) with sound deprivation longer than 10 years. We found no differences regarding age, sex, duration of sound deprivation, mean pure-tone audiometric results (pre- and post-surgery), and speech perception tests (pre-operatively). After one year of the surgery, we observed a significant difference between both groups, with a better performance to group A. The results of speech perception test, after cochlear implantation in group B, were worse than the results obtained in group A, although these correlations are not determinant whether to perform cochlear implant surgery or not.
Bazon, A.C., et al. (2016) Auditory Speech Perception Tests in Relation to the Coding Strategy in Cochlear Implant. International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology, 20, 254-260. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1559595
Gomez, M.V.S.G., et al. (2004) Medical and Audiological Selection Criteria and Evaluation for Cochlear Implants Candidates: HC-FMUSP protocol. International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology, 8, 295-303.
Bento, R.F., et al. (2004) Auditory Results with the Multichannel Cochlear Implant in Patients Undergoing Surgery at the Hospital de las Clínicas of the Faculty of Medicine of the University of São Paulo. Revista Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia, 9, 354-357.
Hyppolito, M.Â. and Bento, R.F. (2012) Directions of the Bilateral Cochlear Implant Brazil. Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology, 78, 2-3. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1808-86942012000100001
Zeitler, D.M., et al. (2009) Revision Cochlear Implantation. Current Opinion in Otolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery, 17, 334-338. https://doi.org/10.1097/MOO.0b013e32832dd6ac
Friedland, D.R., et al. (2003) Choice of Ear for Cochlear Implantation: The Effect of History and Residual Hearing on Predicted Postoperative Performance. Otology & Neurotology, 24, 582-589. https://doi.org/10.1097/00129492-200307000-00009
Lazard, D.S., et al. (2012) Pre-, Per- and Postoperative Factors Affecting Performance of Postlinguistically Deaf Adults Using Cochlear Implants: A New Conceptual Model over Time. PLoS One, 7, e48739. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0048739
Portmann, D., et al. (2007) Bilateral Cochlear Implantation in a Patient with Long-Term Deafness. Revue de Laryngologie Otologie Rhinologie (Bord), 128, 65-68.
Geier, L., et al. (1999) The Effect of Long-Term Deafness on Speech Recognition in Postlingually Deafened Adult CLARION Cochlear Implant Users. Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology, 177, 80-83. https://doi.org/10.1177/00034894991080S416
Blamey, P., et al. (1996) Factors Affecting Auditory Performance of Postlinguistically Deaf Adults Using Cochlear Implants. Audiology and Neurotology, 1, 293-306. https://doi.org/10.1159/000259212
Plank, K., et al. (2016) Factors Predicting Postoperative Unilateral and Bilateral Speech Recognition in Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients with Acoustic Hearing. Ear Hear, 37, 153-163. https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000000233
Moon, I.S., et al. (2014) Is There a Deafness Duration Limit for Cochlear Implants in Post-Lingual Deaf Adults? Acta Oto-Laryngologica, 134, 173-180. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016489.2013.850175
Baskill, J.L. and Coles, R.R.A. (1999) Relationship between Tinnitus Loudness and Severity. In: Hazell, J., Ed., Sixth International Tinnitus Seminar, Cambridge, UK, 424-428.
Ferrari, G.M.S., et al. (2007) The Efficacy of Open Molds in Controlling Tinnitus. Revista Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia, 73, 370-377. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-72992007000300012
Sanchez, T.G., et al. (2005) Tinnitus in Normally Hearing Patients: Clinical Aspects and Repercussions. Revista Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia, 71, 427-431. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-72992005000400005
Silva, R., et al. (2007) Hearing Aid: Does It Reduce the Sensation of Tinnitus? Revista CEFAC, 9, 263-268. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-18462007000200016
Pinto, P.C.L., et al. (2010) The Impact of Gender, Age and Hearing Loss on Tinnitus Severity. Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology, 76, 18-24. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1808-86942010000100004
Van der Berge, M.J.C., et al. (2017) Effect of Direct Stimulation of the Cochleovestibular Nerve on Tinnitus: A Long-Term Follow-Up Study. World Neurosurgery, 98, 571-577.
Tugumia, D., et al. (2016) Auditory Training Program in Subjects with Tinnitus. CoDAS, 28, 27-33. https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20162015113
Mondelli, M.F.C.G., et al. (2016) Correlation between Speech Perception and Tinnitus before and after the Use of Hearing Aids. Audiology—Communication Research, 21, e1649.
Moura, L.O.S., et al. (2004) The Effectiveness of Hearing Aid Fitting in Reducing or Eliminating the Tinnitus. Revista Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia, 70, 624-631. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-72992004000500008
Cox, R.M. and Alexander, G.C. (2002) The International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA): Psychometric Properties of the English Version. International Journal of Audiology, 41, 30-35. https://doi.org/10.3109/14992020209101309
Miziara, I.D., et al. (2012) Bioethics and Medical/Legal Considerations on Cochlear Implants in Children. Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology, 78, 70-79. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1808-86942012000300013
Moret, A.L.M., et al. (2007) Cochlear Implant: Hearing and Language in Pre-Lingual Deaf Children. Pró-Fono Revista de Atualização Científica, 19, 295-304. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-56872007000300008
Angelo, T.C.S., et al. (2010) Speech Perception in Pre-Lingual Deaf Users of Cochlear Implant. Pró-Fono Revista de Atualização Científica, 22, 275-280. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-56872010000300020
Queiroz, C.A.U.F., et al. (2010) Longitudinal Study of Verbal Comprehension of Children with Cochlear Implant. Revista CEFAC, 12, 210-215. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-18462010000200006
Holden, L.K., et al. (2013) Factors Affecting Open-Set Word Recognition in Adults with Cochlear Implants. Ear Hear, 34, 342-360. https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0b013e3182741aa7
Kim, D.K., et al. (2016) Prospective, Multicenter Study on Tinnitus Changes after Cochlear Implantation. Audiology and Neurotology, 21, 165-171. https://doi.org/10.1159/000445164
Greenberg, D., et al. (2015) Developing an Assessment Approach for Perceptual Changes to Tinnitus Sound Characteristics for Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients. International Journal of Audiology, 55, 392-404. https://doi.org/10.3109/14992027.2016.1172391
Chen, X., et al. (2016) Influence of Cochlear Implantation on Vestibular Function. Acta Oto-Laryngologica, 136, 655-659. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016489.2016.1154186
Rosa, M.R.D., et al. (2006) Hearing Aid Program and Self-Assessment Questionnaires: Importants Instruments for Effective Hearing Adaptation. Arq Intern Otorrinolaringol, 10, 220-227.