Influence of the Limited Retransmission on the Performance of WLANs Using Error-Prone Channel
- 1 Department of Electronic Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, P.R.China
- 2 Department of Electronic Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, P.R.China
- 3 Department of Electronic Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, P.R.China
Abstract
In WLANs, stations sharing a common wireless channel are governed by IEEE 802.11 protocol. Many conscious studies have been conducted to utilize this precious medium efficiently. However, most of these studies have been done either under assumption of idealistic channel condition or with unlimited retransmitting number. This paper is devoted to investigate influence of limited retransmissions and error level in the utilizing channel on the network throughput, probability of packet dropping and time to drop a packet. The results show that for networks using basic access mechanism the throughput is suppressed with increasing amount of errors in the transmitting channel over all the range of the retry limit. It is also quite sensitive to the size of the network. On the other side, the networks using four-way handshaking mechanism has a good immunity against the error over the available range of retry limits. Also the throughput is unchangeable with size of the network over the range of retransmission limits. However, the throughput does not change with retry limits when it exceeds the maximum number of the backoff stage in both DCF’s mechanisms. In both mechanisms the probability of dropping a packet is a decreasing function with number of retransmissions and the time to drop a packet in the queue of a station is a strong function to the number of retry limit, size of the network, the utilizing medium access mechanism and amount of errors in the channel.
- G.-i. Ohta, F. Kamada, N. Teramura, and H. Hojo, “5GHz W-LAN verification for public mobile applications -internet newspaper on train and advanced ambulance car,” First IEEE Consumer Communications and Networking Conference. CCNC 2004, 2004, pp. 569-575.
- T. B. Zahariadis, K. G. Vaxevanakis, C. P. Tsantilas, and N. A. Zervos, “Global Roaming in Next-Generation Networks,” IEEE Communications Magazine, February 2002, pp. 145-151.
- www.bbwexchange.com/publications/page1421-4666.asp
- M. Etoh, “Next Generation Mobile Systems 3G and Beyond,” John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2005
- “IEEE Standard for Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) Specifications ,ISO/IEC,” 1999, pp. 8802-11
- H. Zhu and I. Chlamtac, “An Analytical Model for IEEE 802.11e EDCF Differential Services,” The 12th international conference on Computer comunications and networks, ICCCN 2003, Preceedings, 2003, pp. 163-168.
- Y. F. Y. Kwon, and H. Latchman, “Design of MAC Protocols with Fast Collision Resolution for Wireless Local Area Networks,” IEEE Transactions on wireless communications, vol. 3, MAY 2004, pp. 793-807.
- A. C. B. P. Chatzimisios, and V. Vitsas, “Performance analysis of the IEEE 802.11 MAC protocol for wireless LANs,” Int. J. Commun.Syst., vol. 2, 2005, pp. 545-569.
- G.Bianchi, “Performance Analysis of the IEEE 802.11 Distributed Coordination Function,” IEEE Journal on Selected Area in Communications, vol. 18, 2000, pp. 535-547.
- H. Wu, Y. Peng, K. Long, and J. Ma, “Performance of Reliable Transport Protocol over IEEE 802.11 Wireless LAN: Analysis and Enhancement,” Proc. of IEEE INFOCOM, vol. 2, 2002, pp. 599-607
- P. Chatzimisios, A. C. Boucouvalas, and V. Vitsas, “Performance Analysis of IEEE 802.11 DCF in Presence of Transmission Errors,” IEEE International Conference on Communications, 2004, pp. 2854-2858.
- X. Wang, J. Yin, and D. P. Agrawal, “Impact of channel conditions on the throughput optimization in 802.11 DCF,” Wirel. Commun. Mob. Comput., vol. 5, 2005, pp. 113-122.
- Z. Tang, Z. Yang, J. He, and YanweiLiu, “Impact of bit error on the performance of DCF for wireless LAN,” Communications, Circuits and Systems and West Sino Expositions, IEEE 2002 International Conference, 2002, pp. 529-533.