Applications of Amplitude versus Offset and Seismic Attributes for Perceiving Messinian Reservoirs in Nidoco Field, Nile Delta, Egypt
- 1 Belayim Petroleum Company (Petrobel), Cairo, Egypt
- 2 Faculty of Science, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
- 3 Exploration Team Leader at Eni, Cairo, Egypt
- 4 Faculty of Science, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
Abstract
Nile Delta which covers approximately 60,000 square kilometers represents the most important gas province in Egypt whereas its fields provide two- thirds of the gas production in Egypt. The Nile Delta province begins to display its hydrocarbon potentiality in the early 1960s. Nidoco field is located in the shallow water offshore Nile delta. Abu Madi formation (Messinian age) is the most important formation through all the section where it represents the main gas producing reservoirs in the Field. The production of the field is coming from two sand reservoir levels; Abu Madi level 2&3 which are characterized by fluvial-deltaic sandstones. The purpose of this paper is to perceive the Messinian gas bearing reservoirs and channelized sand distribution inside Abu Madi formation using seismic attributes and amplitude versus offset (AVO) technique. The results indicated that the seismic attributes and AVO aided to give a complete picture about the Messinian reservoirs distribution and characterization in the field. Also the results show that there are still promising locations of prospective Abu Madi Level 2&3 which are proposed to be drilled in the field.
- Matresu, J., Bettazzoli, P., Bertello, F., Nassar, M., Bricchi, G., Talaat, A. and Elsayed, A.Z.S. (2014) The Nooros Discovery. Offshore Central.
- Sheriff, R.E. (2002) Encyclopedic Dictionary of Applied Geophysics. Society of Exploration Geophysicists. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.9781560802969
- Asquith, G.B. and Gibson, C.R. (1982) Basic Well Log Analysis for Geologists (Vol. 3). American Association of Petroleum Geologists, Tulsa. https://doi.org/10.1306/Mth3425
- Hussein, M., El-Ata, A.A. and El-Behiry, M. (2020) AVO Analysis Aids in Differentiation between False and True Amplitude Responses: A Case Study of El Mansoura Field, Onshore Nile Delta, Egypt. Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology, 10, 969-989. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13202-019-00806-2
- Chenin, J. (2020) Examining Seismic Amplitude Responses of Gaseous Media Using Unsupervised Machine Learning. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Oklahoma, Norman.
- Ostrander, W.J. (1984) Plane-Wave Reflection Coefficient for Gas Sand at Non-Normal Angles of Incidence. Geophysics, 49, 1637-1648. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1441571
- Rutherford, S.R. and Williams, R.H. (1989). Amplitude-versus-Offset Variations in Gas Sands. Geophysics, 54, 680-688. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1442696
- Stewart, R.R. (1990) Joint P and P-SV Inversion. The CREWES Project Research Report, 2, 112-115.
- Zoeppritz, K. (1919) Joachim Ritter & Johannes Schweitzer. Part C. Biography of Angenheister and of Geiger, Wiechert’s Bibliography, and Biographical Notes, 34.
- Shuey, R.T. (1985) A Simplification of the Zoeppritz Equations. Geophysics, 50, 609-614. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1441936
- Castagna, J.P., Swan, H.W. and Foster, D.J. (1998) Framework for AVO Gradient and Intercept Interpretation. Geophysics, 63, 948-956. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1444406
- Castagna, J.P. (2001) Recent Advances in Seismic Lithologic Analysis. Geophysics, 66, 42-46. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1444918
- Foster, N.E.V. and Zatorre, R.J. (2010) Cortical Structure Predicts Success in Performing Musical Transformation Judgments. NeuroImage, 53, 26-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.06.042
- Ross, C.P. (2002) Comparison of Popular AVO Attributes, AVO Inversion, and Calibrated AVO Predictions. The Leading Edge, 21, 244-252. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1463776