Methodology for Obtaining Optimal Sleeve Friction and Friction Ratio Estimates from CPT Data
- 1 Baziw Consulting Engineers, Vancouver, Canada
Abstract
Cone penetration testing (CPT) is a cost effective and popular tool for geotechnical site characterization. CPT consists of pushing at a constant rate an electronic penetrometer into penetrable soils and recording cone bearing ( q c ), sleeve friction ( f c ) and dynamic pore pressure ( u ) with depth. The measured q c , f s and u values are utilized to estimate soil type and associated soil properties. A popular method to estimate soil type from CPT measurements is the Soil Behavior Type (SBT) chart. The SBT plots cone resistance vs friction ratio, R f [where: R f = ( f s / q c )100%]. There are distortions in the CPT measurements which can result in erroneous SBT plots. Cone bearing measurements at a specific depth are blurred or averaged due to q c values being strongly influenced by soils within 10 to 30 cone diameters from the cone tip. The q c HMM algorithm was developed to address the q c blurring / averaging limitation. This paper describes the distortions which occur when obtaining sleeve friction measurements which can in association with q c blurring result in significant errors in the calculated R f values. This paper outlines a novel and highly effective algorithm for obtaining accurate sleeve friction and friction ratio estimates. The f c optimal filter estimation technique is referred to as the OSFE-IFM algorithm. The mathematical details of the OSFE-IFM algorithm are outlined in this paper along with the results from a challenging test bed simulation. The test bed simulation demonstrates that the OSFE-IFM algorithm derives accurate estimates of sleeve friction from measured values. Optimal estimates of cone bearing and sleeve friction result in accurate R f values and subsequent accurate estimates of soil behavior type.
- Lunne, T., Robertson, P. K. and Powell, J.J.M. (1997) Cone Penetrating Testing: In Geotechnical Practice. Taylor & Francis Group, Oxfordshire.
- Robertson, P.K., Campanella, R.G., Gillespie, D. and Greig, J. (1986) Use of Piezometer Cone Data. In-Situ’86 Use of In-Situ Testing in Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE, Reston, 1263-1280.
- Robertson, P.K. (1990) Soil Classification Using the Cone Penetration Test. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 27, 151-158. https://doi.org/10.1139/t90-014
- ASTM D6067/D6067M-17 (2017) Standard Practice for Using the Electronic Piezocone Penetrometer Tests for Environmental Site Characterization and Estimation of Hydraulic Conductivity. ASTM Vol. 4.09, Soil and Rock (II), D5877-Latest.
- Cai, G.J., Liu, L.Y., Tong, L.Y. and Du, G.Y. (2006) General Factors Affecting Interpretation for the Piezocone Penetration Test (CPTU). Journal of Engineering Geology, 14, 632-636.
- de Ruiter, J. (1971) Electric Penetrometer for Site Investigations. Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, 97, 457-472. https://doi.org/10.1061/JSFEAQ.0001552
- Jamiolkowski, M., Ladd, C.C., Germaine, J.T. and Lancellotta, R. (1985) New Developments in Field and Laborator Testing of Soils. 11th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, San Francisco, 12-16 August 1985, 57-154.
- Boulanger, R.W. and DeJong, T.J. (2018) Inverse Filtering Procedure to Correct Cone Penetration Data for Thin-Layer and Transition Effects. In: Hicks, P. and Peuchen, Eds., Cone Penetration Testing 2018, Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands, 25-44.
- Baziw, E. and Verbeek, G. (2021) Cone Bearing Estimation Utilizing a Hybrid HMM and IFM Smoother Filter Formulation. International Journal of Geosciences, 12, 1040-1054. https://doi.org/10.4236/ijg.2021.1211055
- Baziw, E. and Verbeek, G. (2022) Identification of Thin Soil Layers Utilizing the qmHMM-IFM Algorithm on Cone Bearing Measurements. Geo-Congress 2022, Charlotte, 20-23 March 2022, 505-514. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784484036
- Baziw, E. and Verbeek, G. (2022) Methodology for Obtaining True Cone Bearing Estimates from Blurred and Noisy Measurements. In: Gottardi, G. and Tonni, L., Eds., Cone Penetration Testing 2022, Baziw Consulting Engineers, Vancouver, 115-120. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003308829-9
- Susila, E. and Hryciw, R.D. (2003) Large Displacement FEM Modelling of the Cone Penetration Test (CPT) in Normally Consolidated Sand. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 27, 585-602. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.287