Estimation of Displacement and Extension due to Reverse Drag of Normal Faults: Forward Method
- 1 Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Centro de Geociencias, Apartado Postal 1-742, Querétaro, Qro., México
- 2 Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Centro de Geociencias, Apartado Postal 1-742, Querétaro, Qro., México
- 3 South China Sea Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, China
- 4 Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Centro de Geociencias, Apartado Postal 1-742, Querétaro, Qro., México
Abstract
In the case of reverse drag of normal faulting, the displacement and horizontal extension are determined based on the established equations for the three mechanisms: rigid body, vertical shear and inclined shear. There are three sub-cases of basal detachment for the rigid body model: horizontal detachment, antithetic detachment and synthetic detachment. For the rigid body model, the established equations indicate that the total displacement on the synthetic base ( D t2 ) is the largest, that on the horizontal base ( D t1 ) is moderate, and that on the antithetic base ( D t3 ) is the smallest. On the other hand, the value of ( D t1 ) is larger than the displacement for the vertical shear ( D t4 ). The value of ( D t1 ) is larger than or less than the displacement for the inclined shear ( D t5 ) depending on the original fault dip δ 0 , bedding angle θ , and the angle of shear direction β . For all original parameters, the value of D t5 is less than the value of D t4 . Also, by comparing three rotation mechanisms, we find that the inclined shear produces largest extension, the rigid body model with horizontal detachment produces the smallest extension, and the vertical shear model produces moderate extension.
- Anderson, E.M. (1951) The Dynamic of Faulting and Dyke Formation. Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh, 206 p.
- Jaeger, J.C., Cook, N.G.W. and Zimmerman, R.W. (2007) Fundamentals of Rock Mechanics. Blackwell Publishing, Hoboken.
- Sibson, R.H. (1985) A Note on Fault Reactivation. Journal of Structural Geology, 7, 751-754. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8141(85)90150-6
- Hamblin, W.K. (1965) Origin of “Reverse Drag” on the Downthrown Side of Normal Faults. Bulletin of the Geological Society of America, 76, 1145-1164. https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(1965)76[1145:OORDOT]2.0.CO;2
- Schlische, R.W. (1995) Geometry and Origin of Fault-Related Folds in Extensional Settings. AAPG Bulletin, 79, 1661-1678. https://doi.org/10.1306/7834DE4A-1721-11D7-8645000102C1865D
- Johnson, A.M. (1970) Physical Processes in Geology. Freeman, Cooper and Co., San Francisco, 577 p.
- Mitra, S. (1993) Geometry and Kinematic Evolution of Inversion Structures. AAPG Bulletin, 77, 1159-1191. https://doi.org/10.1306/BDFF8E2A-1718-11D7-8645000102C1865D
- Patton, T.L. (2004) Numerical Models of Growth-Sediment Development above an Active Monocline. Basin Research, 16, 25-39. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2117.2003.00220.x
- Rykkelid, E. and Fossen, H. (2002) Layer Rotation around Vertical Fault Overlap Zones: Observations from Seismic Data, Field Examples, and Physical Experiments. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 19, 181-192. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0264-8172(02)00007-7
- Davis, G.H. (1984) Structural Geology of Rocks and Regions. John Wiley and Sons, New York, 592 p.
- Reches, Z. and Eidelman, A. (1995) Drag along Faults. Tectonophysics, 247, 145-156. https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1951(94)00170-E
- Grasemann, B., Martel, S. and Passchier, C. (2005) Reverse and Normal Drag along a Fault. Journal of Structural Geology, 27, 999-1010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2005.04.006
- Brandes, C. and Tanner, D.C. (2014) Fault-Related Folding: A Review of Kinematic Models and Their Application. Earth-Science Reviews, 138, 352-370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2014.06.008
- Homberg, C., Schnyder, J., Roche, V., Leonardi, V. and Benzaggagh, M. (2017) The Brittle and Ductile Components of Displacement along Fault Zones. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 439, 395-412. https://doi.org/10.1144/SP439.21