The Status of the Gravimetric Geoid across Nigeria
- 1 Department of Surveying and Geomatics, Rivers State University, Port Harcourt, Nigeria
- 2 Department of Surveying and Geomatics, Rivers State University, Port Harcourt, Nigeria
Abstract
Orthometric heights are obtained by Spirit leveling; however, this approach is not only slow but is also costly and time-consuming. Therefore, the uncertainties in the accuracy of geoid height models have hampered the use of GNSS heightening as an alternative method of determining Orthometric heights across Nigeria. This study was aimed at appraising the status of the geoid model in Nigeria based on gravity measurements, applying the remove-compute-restore (r-c-r) approach through the Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) tool. The GRAVSOFT tool was used in evaluating the residual height anomalies and terrain effects resulting from the residual terrain model (RTM). The residual height anomalies, ( ζ res ) were computed by applying the modified Molodenskii Integral tampered 100% zero padding so as to overcome cyclic effects. The residual height anomalies were converted to geoid undulation by adding the ζ-to-N correction. The study revealed that, the difference between the height anomaly ( ζ ) and the geoid height (N) is about 24 cm and the geoid values across Nigeria range between 13.738 m and 26.052 m. There is a tilt of the geoid from the South-west to North-west part of the country. The gravimetric geoid is accurate to ±41 cm rmse when compared with the geometric geoid while the surface fitting revealed that the hybrid-geoid is accurate to ±3 cm rmse.
- Sansò, F. and Sideris, M.G. (2013) Geoid Determination: Theory and Methods. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74700-0
- Adams, R., IIiffe, J., Ziebart, M., Turner, J. and Oliveira, J.F. (2006) Joining up Land and Sea: UKHO/UCL Vertical Offshore Reference Frame. Hydro International , 10, 7-9.
- Hofmann-Wellenhof, B. and Moritz, H. (2006) Physical Geodesy. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-211-33545-1
- Sjoberg, L.E. and Bagherbandi, M. (2017) Gravity Inversion and Integration: Theory and Applications in Geodesy and Geophysics. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-50298-4
- Bureau Gravimetrique International (2015) Land and Marine Gravity Data.
- Ince, E.S., Barthelmes, F., Reißland, S., Elger, K., Förste, C., Flechtner, F., et al . (2019) ICGEM—15 Years of Successful Collection and Distribution of Global Gravitational Models, Associated Services, and Future Plans. Earth System Science Data , 11, 647-674. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-11-647-2019
- Alaska Satellite Facility (2020) ALOS PALSAR—Digital Elevation Model (12.5 m Spatial Resolution. https://asf.alaska.edu/data-sets/derived-data-sets/alos-palsar-rtc/alos-palsar-radiometric-terrain-correction
- Wichiencharoen, C. (1982) The Indirect Effects on the Computation of Geoid Undulations. Report No. 336, Dept. of Geodetic Science and Surveying, The Ohio State University, Columbus.
- Barthmeles, F. (2013) Definition of Functionals of the Geopotential and Their Calculation from Spherical Harmonic Models: Theory and Formulas Used by the Calculation Service of the International Centre for Global Earth Models (ICGEM). Deutsches GeoForschungZentrum GFZ: Scientific Technical Report STR09/02. https://doi.org/10.2312/GFZ.b103-0902-26
- Stelios, P.M. (2010) Gravity, Geoid and Earth Observation. Springer.
- Forsberg, R. (2010) Terrain Effects in Geoid Computations. Lectures Note , International School for the Determination and Use of the Geoid , Saint Petersburg, 28 June-2 July 2010, 159-181.
- Tscherning, C.C. (2012) Geoid Determination by 3D Least-Squares Collocation. In: Sansò, F. and Sideris, M., Eds., Geoid Determination , Springer, 311-336. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74700-0_7
- Forsberg, R. (1984) A Study of Terrain Reductions, Density Anomalies and Geo-physical Inversion Methods in Gravity Field Modelling. Department of Geodetic Science and Surveying, The Ohio State University, No. 355.