Test of Strain Behavior Model with Radon Anomaly in Seismogenic Area: A Bayesian Melding Approach
- 1
- 2 Advanced Digital and Embedded System Lab, Electronics and Tele-Communication Department, Jadavpur University, Kolkata, India; Electronics and Tele-Communication Department, Jadavpur University, Kolkata, India
- 3
Abstract
Mathematical models in seismo-geochemical monitoring offer powerful tools for the study and exploration of complex dynamics associated with discharge of radon as the indicator of change of intense-deformed conditions of seismogenic layers or blocks within the lithosphere. Seismic precursory model of radon gas emanation in the process of earthquake prediction research aims to find out the distinct anomaly variation necessary to correlate radon gas with processes of preparation and realization of tectonic earthquakes in long-term and short-term forecasts tectonic earthquakes. The study involves a radon gas volume analytic model to find the correlation of radon fluctuations to stress drop under compression and dilatation strain condition. Here, we present a mathematical inference by observing radon gas emanation prior to the occurrence of earthquake that may reduce the uncertainties in models and updating their probability distributions in a Bayesian deterministic model. Using Bayesian melding theorem, we implement an inferential framework to understand the process of preparation of tectonic earthquake and concurrent occurrence of radon discharge during a tectonic earthquake phenomena. Bayesian melding for deterministic simulation models was augmented to make use of prior knowledge on correlations between model inputs. The background porosity is used as a priori information for analyzing the block subjected to inelastic strain. It can be inferred that use of probabilistic framework involving exhalation of radon may provide a scenario of earthquake occurrences on recession of the curve that represents a qualitative pattern of radon activity concentration drop, indicating associated stress change within the causative seismogenic fault. Using evidence analysis, we propose a joint conditional probability framework model simulation to understand how a single fracture may be affected in response to an external load and radon anomaly change that can be used to detect the slip, a predictable nature of the causative fault in the subsurface rock.
- H. Wakita, “Geochemical Challenge to Earthquake Prediction,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 93, No. 9, 1996, pp. 3781-3786.
- V. Walia, “Earthquake Prediction Studies Using Radon as a Precursor in N-W Himalayas, India: A Case Study,” TAO, Vol. 16, No. 4, 2005, pp. 775-804.
- V. I. Ulomov and B. Z. Mavashev , “On Forerunner of a Strong Tectonic Earthquake,” Doklady Akademii nauk SSSR, Vol. 176, 1967, pp. 319-322.
- I. Miklavci?, V. Radoli?, B. Vukovi?, M. Poje, M. Varga, D. Stani? and J. Planini?, “Radon Anomaly in Soil Gas as an Earthquake Precursor,” Applied Radiation and Isotopes, Vol. 66, No. 10, 2008, pp. 1459-1466.
- T. Teng, “Some Recent Studies on Ground Water Random Content as an Earthquake Precursor,” Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 85, No. B6, 1980, pp. 3089- 3099. doi:10.1029/JB085iB06p03089
- H. H. Shapiro, J. D. Melvin, T. A. Tombrello, H. H. Mendenhall, P. B. Larson and J. H. Whitcomb, “Relationship of the 1979 Southern California Radon Anomaly to a Possible Regional Strain Event,” Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 86, No. B3, 1981, pp. 1725-1730.
- I. P. Dobrovosky, S. A. Zubkov and V. I. Miachkin, “Estimation of the Size of the Earthquake Preparation Zones,” Pure and Applied Geophysics, Vol. 117, No. 5, 1979, pp. 1025-1044. doi:10.1007/BF00876083
- E. Hauksson, “Radon Content of Ground Water as an Earthquake Precursor: Evaluation of the World Wide Data and Physical Basis,” Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 86, No. B10, 1981, pp. 9397-9410.
- C. Scholz, “Earthquake Prediction: A Physical Basis Science,” Science, Vol. 181, No. 4102, 1973, pp. 803-810. doi:10.1126/science.181.4102.80310
- B. T. Brady, “Anomalous Seismicity Prior to Rock Bursts: Implications for Earthquake Prediction,” Pure and Applied Geophysics, Vol. 115, No. 1-2, 1991, pp. 357-374. doi:10.1007/BF01637114
- V. I. Utkin and A. K. Yurkov, “Radon as a Tracer of Tectonic Movements,” Russian Geology and Geophysics, Vol. 51, No. 2, 2010, pp. 220-227. doi:10.1016/j.rgg.2009.12.022
- D. Poole and A. E. Raftery, “Inference for Deterministic Simulation Models: The Bayesian Melding Approach,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 95, No. 452, 2000, pp. 1244-1255. doi:10.2307/2669764
- R. C. Ramola, Y. Prasad, G. Prasad, S. Kumar and V. M. Choubey, “Soil-Gas Radon as Seismotectonic Indicator in Garhwal Himalaya,” Applied Radiation and Isotopes, Vol. 66, No. 10, 2008, pp. 1523-1530.