Modeling Near-Surface Air Temperature and Precipitation Using WRF with 5-km Resolution in the Northern Patagonia Icefield: A Pilot Simulation
- 1 Dirección Meteorológica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
- 2 1Dirección Meteorológica de Chile, Santiago, Chile 2Universidad de Magallanes, Punta Arenas, Chile
- 3 1Universidad de Magallanes, Punta Arenas, Chile 2GeoEstudios Ltda, Santiago, Chile
- 4 Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile
Abstract
The regional Weather and Research Forecast (WRF) Model was run for the 2000-2010 period over the Northern Patagonia Icefield (NPI) with an horizontal resolution of 5 km. The regional model was initialized using the NCEP/NCAR atmospheric Reanalysis database. The simulation results, centered over the NPI, were validated against the observed data from the local surface stations in order to evaluate the improvement of the model results due to its increased horizontal resolution with respect to the lower resolution from Global Climate Model simulations. Interest in the NPI is due to 1) the large body of frozen water expose d to the impact of the warming planet, 2) the scarce availability of observed meteorological and glaciological information in this large and remote icefield, and 3) the need to validate the model behavior in simulating the current climate and its variability in complex terrain. The results will shed light on the degree of confidence in simulating future climate scenarios in the region and also in similar geographical settings. Based on this study subsequent model runs will allow to model future climate changes in Patagonia, which is basic information for estimating glacier variations to be expected during this century.
- P. Lemke, J. Ren, R.B. Alley, I. Allison, J. Carrasco, G. Flato, Y. Fujii, G. Kaser, P. Mote, R. H. Thomas and T. Zhang, “Observations: Changes in Snow, Ice and Frozen Ground,” In: S. Solomon, D. Qin, M. Manning, Z. Chen, M. Marquis, K. B. Averyt, M. Tignor and H. L. Miller, Eds., Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, New York, 2007.
- E. Rignot, A. Rivera and G. Casassa, “Contribution of the Patagonia Icefields of South America to Sea Level Rise,” Science, Vol. 302, No. 5644, 2003, pp. 434-437. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1087393
- P. López and G. Casassa, “Recent Acceleration of Ice Loss in the Northern Patagonia Icefield Based on an Updated Decennial Evolution,” The Cryosphere Discuss, Vol. 5, No. 6, 2011, pp. 3323-3381. http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/tcd-5-3323-2011
- J. F. Carrasco, G. Casassa and A. Rivera, “Meteorological and Climatological Aspects of the Southern Patagonia Icecap,” In: G. Casassa, F. V. Sepúlveda and R. M. Sinclair, Eds., The Patagonian Icefields: A Unique Natural Laboratory for Environmental and Climate Studies, Kluwer Academic, Boston, 2002, pp. 29-41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0645-4_4
- R. Garreaud, P. Lopez, M. Minvielle and M. Rojas, “Large-Scale Control on the Patagonian Climate,” Journal of Climate, Vol. 26, No. 1, 2013, pp. 215-230. http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00001.1
- J.-C. Aravena and B. H. Luckman, “Spatio-Temporal Rainfall Patterns in Southern South America,” International Journal of Climatology, Vol. 29, No. 14, 2009, pp. 2106-2120. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/joc.1761
- G. Casassa, “Ice Thickness Deduced from Gravity Anomalies on Soler Glacier, Nef Glacier and the Northern Patagonia Icefield,” Bulletin of Glacier Research, Vol. 4, 1987, pp. 43-57.
- E. M. Kalnay, et al., “The NCEP/NCAR 40-Year Reanalysis Project,” Bulletin American Meteorological Society, Vol. 7, 1996, pp. 437-471. http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1996)077 2.0.CO;2
- X.-Z. Liang, et al., “Regional Climate-Weather Research and Forecasting Model,” Bulletin of American Meteorological Society, Vol. 93, No. 9, 2012, pp. 1363-1387. http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00180.1
- G. Thompson, P. R. Field, R. M. Rasmussen and W. D. Hall, “Explicit Forecasts of Winter Precipitation Using an Improved Bulk Microphysics Scheme. Part II: Implementation of a New Snow Parameterization,” Monthly Weather Review, Vol. 136, No. 12, 2008, pp. 5095-5115. http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/2008MWR2387.1