Spatial Assessment of Flood Vulnerability in Aba Urban Using Geographic Information System Technology and Rainfall Information
- 1 Department of Environmental Resource Management, Abia State University, Uturu, Nigeria
- 2 Department of Geography and Planning, Abia State University, Uturu, Nigeria
- 3 Department of Geography and Meteorology, Enugu State University of Science and Technology, Enugu, Nigeria
- 4 Department of Geography, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
Abstract
This study investigated the relationship between topographic information and trends in rainfall in Aba urban, South Eastern Nigeria. GIS data were applied to generate topographical information on runoff characteristics, the slope, the contour, the aspect and the digital elevation model. The Mann-Kendall Trend was applied to the rainfall data to show if a monotonic increase, decrease or stability trend exist for the rainfall data of Aba metropolis for the period 2000-2010. Results showed that virtually all parts of Aba were liable to floods expect Ogbor hill axis. The flood vulnerability map indicated that 71.65% of the study area was vulnerable to flood. Rainfall trend showed a decrease in six out of the ten year period. Since within this period, flood intensity had generally remained the same, we concluded that topography, poor drainage infrastructure and non-compliance with building, planning and environmental regulations rather than rainfall trend were the key cause of flood problem in the study area.
- Smith, K. (2001) Environmental Hazards: Assessing Risk and Reducing Hazards. 3rd Edition, Routledge, New York.
- Daniels, T. and Daniels, K. (2003) The Environmental Planning Handbook for Sustainable Communities and Regions. Planners Press, Chicago.
- Cutter, S.L. (1996) Vulnerability to Environmental Hazards. Progress in Human Geography, 20, 529-539. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/030913259602000407
- O’Brien, K., Eriksen, S., Schjolden, A. and Nygard, L. (2004) What’s in a Word? Conflicting Interpretations of Vulnerability in Climate Change Research. CICERO Working Paper 2004-04, Center for International Climate and Environmental Research, Norway.
- Blaikie, P., Cannon, R., Davis, I. and Wisner, B. (1994) At Risk: Natural Hazards, People’s Vulnerability and Disasters. Routledge, New York, 284 p.
- Kelly, P.M. and Adger, W.N. (2000) Theory and Practice in Assessing Vulnerability to Climate Change and Facilitating Adaptation. Climatic Change, 47, 325-352. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1005627828199
- Montz, B. and Evans, T. (2001) GIS and Social Vulnerability Analysis. In: Gruntfest, E. and Handmer, J., Eds., Coping with Flash Floods, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Amsterdam, 37-48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0918-8_5
- Cutter, S.L., Mitchell, J.T. and Scott, M.S. (2001) Revealing the Vulnerability of People and Places: A Case Study of Georgetown County, South Carolina. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 90, 713-737. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/0004-5608.00219
- Vogel, C. and O’Brien, K. (2004) Vulnerability and Global Environmental Change: Rhetoric and Reality. Information Bulletin on Global Environmental Change and Human Security, Issue No. 13. Environmental Change and Security Project and the International Development Research Centre, Ottawa.
- Faisal, I.M., Kabir, M.R. and Nishat, A. (2000) Non-Structural Flood Mitigation Measures for Dhaka, City. Urban Water, 1,145-153. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1462-0758(00)00004-2
- Wu, Y.E., Yarnal, B. and Fisher, A. (2002) Vulnerability of Coastal Communities to Sea Level Rise: A Case Study of Cape May County, New Jersey, USA. Climate Research, 22, 255-270. http://dx.doi.org/10.3354/cr022255
- Muller, A.O., Rieter, J. and Weilman, U. (2011) Assessment of Urban Vulnerability towards Floods Using an Indicator Based Approach: A Case Study for Santiago de Chile. Natural Hazards and Earth Systems Science, 11, 2107-2123. http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/nhess-11-2107-2011