Impact of Tropospheric Delay Gradients on Total Tropospheric Delay and Precise Point Positioning
- 1 Department of Hydrographic Surveying, Faculty of Maritime Studies, King Abdulaziz University,Jeddah, KSA
- 2 Department of Hydrographic Surveying, Faculty of Maritime Studies, King Abdulaziz University,Jeddah, KSA
- 3 Engineering Department of Public Works, Faculty of Engineering, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
Abstract
GPS signals are electromagnetic waves that are affected by the Earth’s atmosphere. The Earth’s atmosphere can be categorized, according to its effect on GPS signals, into the ionosphere (ionospheric delay) and neutral atmosphere (tropospheric delay). The first-order ionospheric delay can be eliminated by linear combination of GPS observables on different frequencies. However, tropospheric delay cannot be eliminated because it is frequency-independent. The total tropospheric delay can be divided into three components. The first is the dry component, the second part is the wet component, and the third part is the horizontal gradients which account for the azimuthal dependence of tropospheric delay. In this paper, the effect of modeling tropospheric gradients on the estimation of the total tropospheric delay and station position is investigated. Long session, one month during January 2015, of GPS data is collected from ten randomly selected globally distributed IGS stations. Two cases are studied: the first case, the coordinates of stations are kept fixed to their actual values and the tropospheric delay is estimated twice, with and without tropospheric gradients. In the second case, the station position is estimated along with the total tropospheric delay with and without tropospheric gradients. It is shown that the average bias of the estimated total tropospheric delay when neglecting tropospheric gradients ranges from ?1.72 mm to 2.14 mm while the average bias when estimating gradients are ?0.898 mm to 1.92 mm which means that the bias is reduced by about 30%. In addition, the average standard deviation of the bias is 4.26 mm compared with 4.52 mm which means that the standard deviation is improved by about 6%.
- El-Rabbany, A. (2006) Introduction to GPS: The Global Positioning System. 2nd Edition, Artech House Mobile Communications Series. Artech House, Boston, xiv, 210 p.
- Misra, P. and Enge, P. (2006) Global Positioning System: Signals, Measurements, and Performance. 2nd Edition, Ganga-Jamuna Press, Lincoln.
- Kleusberg, A. and Teunissen, P.J.G. (1998) GPS for Geodesy. 2nd Edition, Springer, Berlin, New York, xiv, 650 p.
- Gutman, S., Fuller-Rowell, T. and Robinson, D. (2003) Using NOAA Atmospheric Models to Improve Ionospheric and Tropospheric Corrections. US Coast Guard DGPS Symposium, Portsmouth.
- Kouba, J. (2009) A Guide to Using International GNSS Service (IGS) Products. https://igscb.jpl.nasa.gov/igscb/resource/pubs/UsingIGSProductsVer21.pdf
- IERS Convention (2010) IERS Technical Note 36. http://www.iers.org/IERS/EN/Publications/TechnicalNotes/tn36.html/
- Morel, L., Pottiaux, E., Durand, F., Fund, F., Boniface, K., de Oliveira Junior, P.S. and Van Baelen, J. (2015) Validity and Behaviour of Tropospheric Gradients Estimated by GPS in Corsica. Advances in Space Research, 55, 135-149. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2014.10.004
- Saastamoinen, J. (1972) Contributions to the Theory of Atmospheric Refraction. Bulletin Géodésique, 105, 279-298. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02521844
- Davis, J.L., Herring, T.A., Shapiro, I.I., Rogers, A.E.E. and Elgered, G. (1985) Geodesy by Radio Interferometry: Effects of Atmospheric Modeling Errors on Estimates of Baseline Length. Radio Science, 20, 1593-1607. http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/RS020i006p01593
- Berrada Baby, H., Golé, P. and Lavergnat, J. (1988) A Model for the Tropospheric Excess Path Length of Radio Waves from Surface Meteorological Measurements. Radio Science, 23, 1023-1038. http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/RS023i006p01023
- Hopfield, H.S. (1969) Two-Quartic Tropospheric Refractivity Profile for Correcting Satellite Data. Journal of Geophysical Research, 74, 4487-4499. http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/JC074i018p04487
- Chao, C.C. (1971) The Tropospheric Calibration Model for Mariner Mars 1971. Technical Report 32-1587, 61-76.
- Herring, T. (1992) Modeling Atmospheric Delays in the Analysis of Space Geodetic Data. In: De Munck, J.C. and Spoelstra, T.A., Eds., Proceedirws of Refraction of Transatmospheric Simals in Geodesy, Geodetic Commission Publications on Geodesy, Netherlands.