Accuracy Assessment of Land Use/Land Cover Classification Using Remote Sensing and GIS
- 1 Department of Civil Engineering, Tshwane University Technology, Pretoria, South Africa
- 2 Department of Civil Engineering, Tshwane University of Technology, Pretoria, South Africa
- 3 Department of Civil Engineering, Vaal University of Technology, Vanderbijlpark, South Africa
Abstract
Remote sensing is one of the tool which is very important for the production of Land use and land cover maps through a process called image classification. For the image classification process to be successfully, several factors should be considered including availability of quality Landsat imagery and secondary data, a precise classification process and user’s experiences and expertise of the procedures. The objective of this research was to classify and map land-use/land-cover of the study area using remote sensing and Geospatial Information System (GIS) techniques. This research includes two sections (1) Landuse/Landcover (LULC) classification and (2) accuracy assessment. In this study supervised classification was performed using Non Parametric Rule. The major LULC classified were agriculture (65.0%), water body (4.0%), and built up areas (18.3%), mixed forest (5.2%), shrubs (7.0%), and Barren/bare land (0.5%). The study had an overall classification accuracy of 81.7% and kappa coefficient (K) of 0.722. The kappa coefficient is rated as substantial and hence the classified image found to be fit for further research. This study present essential source of information whereby planners and decision makers can use to sustainably plan the environment.
- Disperati, L., Gonario S. and Virdis, P. (2015) Assessment of Land-Use and Land-Cover Changes from 1965 to 2014 in Tam Giang-Cau Hai Lagoon, Central Vietnam. Applied Geography, 58, 48-64.
- Moran, E. F., Skole, D.L. and Turner, B.L. (2004) The Development of the International Land-Use and Land-Cover Change (LUCC) Research Program and Its Links to NASA’s Landcover and Land-Use Change (LCLUC) Initiatives. Kluwer Academic Publication, Netherlands.
- Merchant, J.W. and Narumalani, S. (2009) Integrating Remote Sensing and Geographic Information Systems. Papers in Natural Resources, Paper 216. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/natrespapers/216
- Murty, P.S. and Tiwari, H. (2015) Accuracy Assessment of Land Use Classification —A Case Study of Ken Basin. Journal of Civil Engineering and Architecture Research, 2, 1199-1206.
- Congalton, R.G. (1991) A Review of Assessing the Accuracy of Classifications of Remotely Sensed Data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 37, 35-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/0034-4257(91)90048-B
- Campbell, J.B. (2007) Introduction to Remote Sensing. 4th Edition, The Guilford Press, New York.
- Jensen, J.R. (2005) Introductory Digital Image Processing: A Remote Sensing Perspective. 3rd Edition, Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
- Eastman, J.R. (2003) Guide to GIS and Image Processing 14, 239-247. Clark University Manual, USA.
- Richards, J. and Jia, X. (2006) Remote Sensing Digital Image Analysis: An Introduction. Springer, Berlin.
- Fielding, A.H. and J.F. Bell. (1997) A Review of Methods for the Assessment of Prediction Errors in Conservation Presence/Absence Models. Environmental Conservation, 24, 38-49. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892997000088
- Lurz, P.W.W., Rushton, S.P., Wauters, L.A., Bertolino, S., Currado, I., Mazzoglio, P. and Shirley, M.D.F. (2001) Predicting Grey Squirrel Expansion in North Italy: A Spatially Explicit Modeling Approach. Landscape Ecology, 16, 407-420. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017508711713
- Jenness, J. and Wynne, J.J. (2007) Kappa Analysis (kappa_stats.avx) Extension for ArcView 3.x. Jenness Enterprises. http://www.jennessent.com/arcview/kappa_stats.htm
- Jensen, J.R. (1996) Introductory Digital Image Processing: A Remote Sensing Perspective. 2nd Edition, Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ.
- Landis, J.R. and Koch, G.G. (1977) A One-Way Components of Variance Model for Categorical Data. Biometrics, 33, 671-679. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529465