GPR Tomographic Imaging of Concrete Tubes and Steel/Plastic Tanks Buried in IAG/USP Geophysical Test Site, Brazil
- 1 Universidade de São Paulo, Instituto de Astronomia, Geofísica e Ciências Atmosféricas, Departamento de Geofísica. Rua do Matão, 1226, Butantã, São Paulo, Brazil
- 2 Universidade de São Paulo, Instituto de Astronomia, Geofísica e Ciências Atmosféricas, Departamento de Geofísica. Rua do Matão, 1226, Butantã, São Paulo, Brazil
- 3 Universidade de São Paulo, Instituto de Astronomia, Geofísica e Ciências Atmosféricas, Departamento de Geofísica. Rua do Matão, 1226, Butantã, São Paulo, Brazil
- 4 Universidade de São Paulo, Instituto de Astronomia, Geofísica e Ciências Atmosféricas, Departamento de Geofísica. Rua do Matão, 1226, Butantã, São Paulo, Brazil
Abstract
In this paper, the Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) method was used to characterize concrete tubes and steel/plastic tanks buried in IAG/USP test site. The microwave tomography was used to improve the GPR images, aiming to retrieve the geometry of the targets. The numerical modeling studies also were done in order to predict the GPR results of the buried targets and to give more reliability to the results interpretation. The targets were installed in the first shallow geophysical test site of the Brazil located at Institute of Astronomy, Geophysics, and Atmospheric Science (IAG) of the University of São Paulo (USP). GPR profiles of 200 MHz (shielded bistatic antennas) were acquired along three lines containing concrete tubes and steel/plastic tanks buried in subsoil. The concrete tubes show a hyperbolic reflector for the top, and the vertical tube also presented a reflection on its bottom. The horizontal steel tanks were characterized by a strong GPR reflection on their top. The empty plastic tank shows a strong reflector for the top with normal polarity. On the other hand, the plastic tank filled with water shows a weaker reflector for its top characterized by the inverted polarity of GPR signal when compared with empty plastic tank. The plastic tank filled with water also went characterized by the strong reflection to its bottom, being a good indicative to interpret GPR data on target in subsoil with some types of fluid inside of tank. The results of polarity difference for the top of tank can be used as guide pattern to identify buried tank empty or filled with water. The application of microwave tomography to the GPR data permitted to determine the position and get a good identification of the edges of the targets studied. The numeric modeling presented a good accordance with real data reducing the ambiguities in interpretation of results. These results can be used as a reference, and they can be extrapolated for areas where there is no subsurface information.
- Ward, S.H. and Hohmann, G.W. (1987) Electromagnetic Theory for Geophysical Applications. In: Nabighian, M.N., Ed., Electromagnetic Methods in Applied Geophysics, Vol. 1, Society of Exploration Geophysicists, 131-311.
- Daniels, D.J. (1996) Surface Penetrating Radar. The Institution of Electrical Engineers, London, UK, 300 p.
- Porsani, J.L. (1999) Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR): Proposta metodológica de emprego em estudos geológico-geotécnicos nas regioes de Rio Claro e Descalvado-SP. Ph.D. Thesis, Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita, Brazil.
- Annan, A.P. (2003) Ground Penetrating Radar Principles, Procedures & Applications. Sensors & Software Inc., 286 p.
- Daniels, D.J. (2004) Ground Penetrating Radar. IET, London, UK. https://doi.org/10.1049/PBRA015E
- Daniels, D.J. (2007) Ground Penetrating Radar. IET Radar, Sonar, Navigation and Avionics Series 15, 2nd Edition, 726.
- Jol, H.M. (2009) Ground Penetrating Radar: Theory and Applications. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
- Daniels, J.J., Roberts, R. and Vendl, M. (1995) Ground Penetrating Radar for the Detection of Liquid Contaminants. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 33, 95-207.
- Zeng, X. and McMechan, G.A. (1997) GPR Characterization of Buried Tanks and Pipes. Geophysics, 62, 797-806. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1444189
- Grandjean, G., Gourry, J.C. and Bitri, A. (2000) Evaluation of GPR Techniques for Civil-Engineering Applications: Study on a Test Site. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 45, 141-156.
- Paniagua, J., Del Rio, M. and Rufo, M. (2004) Test Site for the Analysis of Subsoil GPR Signal Propagation. Tenth International Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR’2004), Delft, The Netherlands, 21-24 June 2004.
- Porsani, J.L., Borges, W.R., Rodrigues, S.I. and Hiodo, F.Y. (2006) O Sítio Controlado de Geofísica Rasa do IAG/USP: Instalacao e Resultados GPR 2D-3D. Revista Brasileira de Geofísica, 24, 49-61. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-261X2006000100004
- Rodrigues, S.I. and Porsani, J.L. (2006) Utilizacao do GPR para caracterizar tambores plásticos enterrados no sítio controlado de geofísica rasa do IAG/USP. Revista Brasileira de Geofísica, 24, 157-168. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0102-261x2006000200001
- Porsani, J.L. and Sauck, W.A. (2007) GPR Profiles over Multiple Steel Tanks: Artifact Removal through Effective Data Processing. Geophysics, 72, J77-J83. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.2783412