Using Geostatistical Kriging for Hydrologic Models’ Parameters Estimation on Niger River Watersheds in West Africa
- 1 Department of Geology and Mines, Malian National School of Engineers, Abderhamane Baba Touré (ENI-ABT), Bamako, Mali
- 2 Synergy of Miners-Environmentalists Limited, Bamako, Mali
Abstract
Geostatistical Kriging is performed on hydrologic model parameters in a two-dimensional region—different from the geographical space—as a hydrospace. The x-axis in percent is a relative difference of soil characteristics between an embedded 12 watersheds in reference to a large one related to the Niger River in West Africa; noted var_WHC, it stands for Water Holding Capacity. The y-axis in percent, var_Nash, is a hydrologic model’s efficiency in two contexts: (a) calibrated model parameters on the reference watershed are injected in modelling on each sub-watershed in validation phase to produce a series of Nash values as references, (b) a second series of Nash values is produced in calibrations. SimulHyd which stands for Simulation of Hydrological Systems is applied along with a French hydrological model—Genie Rural with 2 parameters at Monthly time step. The built Nash-WHC hydrospace and its two variants, or hybrids, permit the krige of both hydrologic model’s parameters. The relative variation of upper module absolute ranges from 0.1% to 15.68%—the developed hydro-geostatistics practice is considered in reference to hydrological calibration. Accepted as hydrogeostatistics practice, it is applicable to ungauged watersheds to estimate hydrologic models’ parameters.
- Matheron, G. (1962) Traité de géostatistique appliquée, vol 14. Editions Technip.
- Blöschl, G., Bierkens, M.F.P., Chambel, A., Cudennec, C., Destouni, G., Fiori, A., et al . (2019) Twenty-Three Unsolved Problems in Hydrology (UPH)—A Community Perspective. Hydrological Sciences Journal , 64, 1141-1158.
- Salif, K., Gil, M., Fatogoma, B., Emmanuel, P., Alain, D. and Eric, S. (2023) Building Tools for Further Investigating Acid Mining Production: Intercomparison of Four Hydrological Model Versions through a Scoring Technique on the Niger River Basin, in West Africa. Earth & Environmental Science Research & Reviews , 6, 566-594. https://doi.org/10.33140/EESRR.06.04.02
- Koné, S. (2024) Building Tools for Further Investigating Acid Mining Production: Intercomparison of Four Hydrological Model Versions through a Scoring Technique on the Niger River Basin, in West Africa. In: Ahuja, V.K., et al ., Eds., Perspectives of Natural Resource Management , National Law University and Judicial Academy, 105-131. https://nluassam.ac.in/docs/pub/Natural-Resourse-Management.pdf
- R Core Team (2024) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
- Boyer, J.F., Dieulin, C., Rouche, N., Cres, A., Servat, E., Paturel, J.E. and Mahe, G. (2006) SIEREM: An Environmental Information System for Water Resources. IAHS Publication, 19, 308.
- Koné, S. (2015) Apport de la Géostatistique à la Modélisation Hydrologique: Etude de Bassins Hydrologiques en Zone Soudano-Sahélienne. Master’s Thesis, Institut Supérieur de Formation et de Recherche Appliquée.
- Ardoin-Bardin, S., Dezetter, A., Servat, E., Dieulin, C., Casenave, L., Niel, H., Mahe, G., et al . (2006) Application of Climatic Scenarios in Hydrological Modelling: Using GCMs Outputs. In: Cadier, E., Ed., Climate Variability and Change : Hydrological Impacts , IAHS Publications, 436-441.
- Haruna, A., Garambois, P., Roux, H., Javelle, P. and Jay-Allemand, M. (2022) Does Flash Flood Model Performance Increase with Complexity? Signature and Sensitivity-Based Comparison of Conceptual and Process-Oriented Models on French Mediterranean Cases. Hydrology , 9, Article 141. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology9080141
- Okiria, E., Okazawa, H., Noda, K., Kobayashi, Y., Suzuki, S. and Yamazaki, Y. (2022) A Comparative Evaluation of Lumped and Semi-Distributed Conceptual Hydrological Models: Does Model Complexity Enhance Hydrograph Prediction? Hydrology , 9, Article 89. https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrology9050089