Evaluation of a Disc Tube Methodology for Nano- and Ultrafiltration of Natural Dissolved Organic Matter (DOM)
- 1 Center for Earth System Research and Sustainability, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
- 2 Center for Earth System Research and Sustainability, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
Abstract
The performance of a disc tube (DT) methodology, originally designed for reverse osmosis (RO) in desalination, and applied here for ultrafiltration (UF) and nanofiltration (NF) of dissolved organic matter (DOM) in a set of fresh (0 ppt), brackish (10 ppt) and saline (30 ppt) waters at low (1 - 2 mg/L), medium (5 - 6 mg/L) and high (10 - 12 mg/L) dissolved organic carbon (DOC) content is presented. The DT module allows for time efficient processing of large volumes of sample and can be operated with RO, NF and UF membranes. We examined the performance of a NF membrane with nominal molecular weight cut-off (MWCO) of 500 Da and UF membranes with MWCO of 1 kDa and 10 kDa. Throughout the experiments we monitored DOM in terms of DOC, UV-absorption coefficient ratios (E2/E3) and the specific UV-absorbance at 254 nm (SUVA 254 ). Detailed protocols for operating the disc tube modules are proposed. The membranes can be efficiently cleaned to provide low carbon blanks (<0.2 mg/L). Calibration confirmed separation of high and low molecular weight standards into the retentate and permeate fractions, respectively. DOC mass balance of fractionated DOM samples showed good recoveries (123 % ± 32% at 500 Da, 95 % ± 12% at 1 kDa and 99 % ± 11% at 10 kDa) (n = 9). The actual retention rates for 500 Da and 1 kDA were close to those reported by the manufacturer (~200 Da and ~3 kDa, respectively). However, the manufacturer ’ s rated 10 kDa membrane actually retained only DOM > 35 kDa. Salt addition (up to 30 ppt) caused a significant reduction in the amount of high molecular weight (HMW) compounds isolated in the 1 and 10 kDa retentates, due to coiling of macromolecules with increasing ionic strength. These findings underline the importance of stringent operating protocols and the salinity dependence of HMW retention.
- M. Baalousha, B. Stolpe and J. R. Lead, “Flow FieldFlow Fractionation for the Analysis and Characterization of Natural Colloids and Manufactured Nanoparticles in Environmental Systems: A Critical Review,” Journal of Chromatography A, Vol. 1218, No. 27, 2011, pp. 40784103. doi:10.1016/j.chroma.2011.04.063
- L. Guo and P. H. Santschi, “Ultrafiltration and Its Applications to Sampling and Characterisation of Aquatic Colloids,” In: K. J. Wilkinson and J. R. Lead, Eds., Environmental Colloids and Particles, IUPAC Series on Analytical and Physical Chemistry of Environmental Systems, Vol. 10, John Wileys & Sons, Hoboken, 2006, pp. 159221.
- A. G. Fane, C. Y. Wang and R. Wang, “Membrane Technology for Water: Microfiltration, Ultrafiltration, and Reverse Osmosis,” In: K. Hanaki and T. Vereijken, Eds., Treatise on Water Science: Water Quality Engineering, Vol. 4, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2011, pp. 301-335. doi:10.1016/B978-0-444-53199-5.00091-9
- B. Schwalger and A. Spitzy, “Separation of Natural Organic Colloids with a PALL Tangential Flow Filtration System,” Water Science and Technology, Water Supply, Vol. 9, No. 5, 2009, pp. 583-590. doi:10.2166/ws.2009.574
- L. Guo and P. H. Santschi, “A Critical Evaluation of the Cross-Flow Ultrafiltration Technique for Sampling Colloidal Organic Carbon in Seawater,” Marine Chemistry, Vol. 55, No. 1-2, 1996, pp. 113-127. doi:10.1016/S0304-4203(96)00051-5
- J. Kilduff and W. J. Weber, “Transport and Separation of Organic Macromolecules in Ultrafiltration Processes,” Environmental Science and Technology, Vol. 26, No. 3, 1992, pp. 569-577. doi:10.1021/es00027a021
- C. Guéguen, C. Belin and J. Dominik, “Organic Colloid Separation in Contrasting Aquatic Environments with Tangential Flow Filtration,” Water Research, Vol. 36, No. 7, 2002, pp. 1677-1684. doi:10.1016/S0043-1354(01)00374-8
- T. A. Peters, “Desalination and Industrial Waste Water Treatment with the ROCHEM Disc Tube Module DT,” Desalination, Vol. 83, No. 1-3, 1991, pp. 159-172. doi:10.1016/0011-9164(91)85092-9
- E. E. Chang, Y.-W. Chen, Y.-L. Lin and P.-C. Chiang, “Reduction of Natural Organic Matter by Nanofiltration Process,” Chemosphere, Vol. 76, No. 9, 2009, pp. 12651272. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2009.04.053
- B. R. Kruger, B. J. Dalzell and E. C. Minor, “Effect of Organic Matter Source and Salinity on Dissolved Organic Matter Isolation via Ultrafiltration and Solid Phase Extraction,” Aquatic Science, Vol. 73, No. 3, 2011, pp. 405417. doi:10.1007/s00027-011-0189-4