The goal of the present study was to investigate age-related changes in attentional allocation for shared task representations during joint performance; event-related potentials were recorded while participants performed a modified visual three-stimulus oddball task, both alone and together with another participant. Younger adults and older adults (14 each) participated in the study. Participants were required to identify rare target stimuli while ignoring frequent standards, as well as rare non-targets assigned to a partner’s action ( i.e ., no-go stimuli for one’s own task). ERP component, nogo-P3 and P3b were measured to investigate the inhibition and the attentional allocation to the partner’s stimuli. Results showed that younger adults elicited larger frontal nogo P3 and parietal P3b for non-targets in the joint than in the individual condition. Contrary to expectation, older adults induced frontal no-go P3 in the joint condition not in the individual condition. In the sharing of the task with another, the result suggested that the efficiency of matching of incoming information with the representation of the other’s task declined with age, whereas aging did not affect the suppression of incorrect preparation of motor responses instigated by this representation.
West, R.L. (1996) An Application of Prefrontal Cortex Function Theory to Cognitive Aging. Psychological Bulletin, 120, 272-292. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.120.2.272
Chao, L.L. and Knight, R.T. (1997) Prefrontal Deficits in Attention and Inhibitory Control with Aging. Cerebral Cortex, 7, 63-69. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/7.1.63
Tun, P.A. and Wingfield, A. (1995) Does Dividing Attention Become Harder with Age? Findings from the Divided Attention Questionnaire. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 2, 39-66. https://doi.org/10.1080/13825589508256588
Fraser, S. and Bherer, L. (2013). Age-Related Decline in Divided-Attention: From Theoretical Lab Research to Practical Real-Life Situations. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Cognitive Science, 4, 623-640. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1252
Knoblich, G. and Sebanz, N. (2006) The Social Nature of Perception and Action. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15, 99-104. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2006.00415.x
Gallese, V,. Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L. and Rizzolatti, G. (1996) Action Recognition in the Premotor Cortex. Brain, 119, 593-609. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/119.2.593
Rizzolatti, G., Fadiga, L., Gallese, V. and Fogassi, L. (1996) Premotor Cortex and the Recognition of Motor Actions. Cognitive Brain Research, 3, 131-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/0926-6410(95)00038-0
Atmaca, S., Sebanz, N. and Knoblich, G. (2011) The Joint Flanker Effect: Sharing Tasks with Real and Imagined Co-Actors. Experimental Brain Research, 211, 371-385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-011-2709-9
Atmaca, S., Sebanz, N., Prinz, W. and Knoblich G. (2008) Action Co-Representation: The Joint SNARC Effect. Social Neuroscience, 3, 410-420. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470910801900908
Böckler, A., Knoblich, G. and Sebanz, N. (2012) Effects of a Coactor’s Focus of Attention on Task Performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology, Human Perception and Performance, 38, 1404-1415. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027523
Sebanz, N., Knoblich, G. and Prinz, W. (2003) Representing Others’ Actions: Just Like One’s Own? Cognition, 88, B11-B21. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(03)00043-X
Dolk, T., Hommel, B., Colzato, L.S., Schütz-Bosbach, S., Prinz, W. and Liepelt, R. (2014) The Joint Simon Effect: A Review and Theoretical Integration. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 974. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00974
Knoblich, G., Butterfill, S. and Sebanz, N. (2011) Psychological Research on Joint Action: Theory and Data. In: Ross, B., Ed., The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, Vol. 54, Academic Press, Burlington, 59-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-385527-5.00003-6
Baus, C., Sebanz, N., de la Fuente, V., Branzi, F.M., Martin, C. and Costa, A. (2014) On Predicting Others’ Words: Electrophysiological Evidence of Prediction in Speech Production. Cognition, 133, 395-407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2014.07.006
Kato, K., Yoshizaki, K. and Kimura, Y. (2016) Priority for One’s Own Stimulus in Joint Performance: Evidence from an Event-Related Potential Study. NeuroReport, 27, 564-567. https://doi.org/10.1097/WNR.0000000000000566
Sebanz, N., Knoblich, G., Prinz, W. and Wascher, E. (2006) Twin Peaks: An ERP Study of Action Planning and Control in Co-Acting Individuals. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 859-870. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2006.18.5.859
Tsai, C.C., Kuo, W.J., Hung, D.L. and Tzeng, O.J. (2008) Action Co-Representation Is Tuned to Other Humans. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20, 2015-2024. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2008.20144
Tsai, C.-C., Kuo, W.-J., Jing, J.-T., Hung, D.L. and Tzeng, O.J.-L. (2006) A Common Coding Framework in Self-Other Interaction: Evidence from Joint Action Task. Experimental Brain Research, 175, 353-362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-006-0557-9
Falkenstein, M., Koshlykova, N.A., Kiroj, V.N., Hoormann, J. and Hohnsbein, J. (1995) Late ERP Components in Visual and Auditory Go/Nogo Tasks. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 96, 36-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-4694(94)00182-K
van Dinteren, R., Arns, M., Jongsma, M.L.A. and Kessels, R.P.C. (2014) P300 Development across the Life Span: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. PloS One, 9, e87347. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0087347
Kok, A. (2001) On the Utility of P3 amplitude as a Measure of Processing Capacity. Psychophysiology, 38, 557-577.
Polich, J. (2007) Updating P300: An Integrative Theory of P3a and P3b. Clinical Neurophysiology, 118, 2128-2148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2007.04.019
Wronka, E., Kuniecki, M., Kaiser, J. and Coenen, A.M.L. (2007) The P3 Produced by Auditory Stimuli Presented in a Passive and Active Condition: Modulation by Visual Stimuli. Acta Neurobiologiae Experimentalis, 67, 155-164.
Donchin, E. and Coles, M.G.H. (1988) Is the P300 Component a Manifestation of Context Updating? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 11, 357-374. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00058027
Dien, J., Spencer, K.M. and Donchin, E. (2004) Parsing the Late Positive Complex: Mental Chronometry and the ERP Components That Inhabit the Neighborhood of the P300. Psychophysiology, 41, 665-678.
McCarthy, G. and Donchin, E. (1981) A Metric for Thought: A Comparison of P300 Latency and Reaction Time. Science, 211, 77-80. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7444452
Williams, K.D., Cheung, C.K.T. and Choi, W. (2000) Cyberostracism: Effects of Being Ignored over the Internet. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 748-762. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.5.748
Katayama, J. and Polich, J. (1996) P300, Probability, and the Three-Tone Paradigm. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 100, 555-562. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-5597(96)95171-0
Katayama, J. and Polich, J. (1999) Auditory and Visual P300 Topography from a 3 Stimulus Paradigm. Clinical Neurophysiology, 110, 463-468. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1388-2457(98)00035-2
Kaufman, D.A., Keith, C.M. and Perlstein, W.M. (2016) Orbitofrontal Cortex and the Early Processing of Visual Novelty in Healthy Aging. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 8, 101. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2016.00101
Folstein, M.F., Folstein S.E. and McHugh, P.R. (1975) “Minimental State”: A Practical Method for Grading the Cognitive State of Patients for the Clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12, 189-198. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6
Polich, J. (2003) Overview of P3a and P3b. In: Polich, J., Ed., Detection of Change: Event-Related Potential and fMRI Findings, Kluwer Academic Press, Boston, 83-98. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0294-4_5
Cabeza, R., Anderson, N.D., Locantore, J.K. and McIntosh, A.R. (2002) Aging Gracefully: Compensatory Brain Activity in High-Performing Older Adults. Neuroimage, 17, 1394-1402. https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.2002.1280