Tasks with stimuli are often used for the examination of stimulus-related functional characteristics of brain areas. However, the task can affect the response to a stimulus. Repetition suppression is a phenomenon that can be used to probe neuronal properties using macroscale functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). The use of repetition suppression as an investigative tool to assess functional characteristics warrants the investigation of the invariance of repetition suppression to a given task. In this study, we examined repetition suppression using images of faces during different tasks. We found that the task difference did not change the response patterns related to repetition suppression in high-level areas and the primary visual area while it changed amplitudes of fMRI response to the visual stimuli. The result suggests that the repetition-suppression phenomenon is robust compared with the amplitude of fMRI response, and functional characteristics can be examined using the repetition-suppression phenomenon even under the condition that fMRI response is varied by task difference.
Ogawa, S., Lee, T.-M., Stepnoski, R., Chen, W., Zhu, X.-H. and Ugurbil, K. (2000) An Approach to Probe Some Neural Systems Interaction by Functional MRI at Neural Time Scale down to Milliseconds. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 97, 11026-11031. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.97.20.11026
Waldeck, R., Pereda, A. and Faber, D.S. (2000) Properties and Plasticity of Paired-Pulse Depression at a Central Synapse. The Journal of Neuroscience, 20, 5321-5320.
Henson, R.N. and Rugg, M.D. (2003) Neural Response Suppression, Haemodynamic Repetition Effects, and Behavioral Priming. Neuropsychologia, 41, 263-270. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0028-3932(02)00159-8
Grill-Spector, K., Henson, R. and Martin, A. (2006) Repetition and the Brain: Neural Models of Stimulus-Specific Effects. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 14-23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2005.11.006
Kravitz, D.J., Vinson L.D. and Baker C.I. (2008) How Position Dependent Is Visual Object Recognition? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12, 114-122. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2007.12.006
Harel, A., Kravitz D.J. and Baker C.I. (2014) Task Context Impacts Visual Object Processing Differentially across the Cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, in press.
Kanwisher N. and Wojciulik E. (2000) Visual Attention: Insights from Brain Imaging. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 1, 91-100. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/35039043
O’Conner, D.H., Fukui, M.M., Pinsk, M.A. and Kastner, S. (2002) Attention Modulates Responses in the Human Lateral Geniculate Nucleus. Nature Neuroscience, 5, 1203-1209. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nn957
O’Craven, K.M., Downing P.E. and Kanwisher N. (1999) fMRI Evidences for Objects as the Units of Attentional Selection. Nature, 401, 584-587. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/44134
Reddy, L., Moradi, F. and Koch C. (2007) Top-Down Biases Win against Focal Attention in the Fusiform Face Area. Neuroimage, 28, 730-739. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.08.006
Sprague, T.C. and Serences, J.T. (2013) Attention Modulates Spatial Priority Maps in the Human Occipital, Parietal and Frontal Cortices. Nature Neuroscience, 16, 1879-1887. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nn.3574
Yantis, S. (2008) The Neural Basis of Selective Attention. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17, 86-90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2008.00554.x
Davidesco, I., Harel, M., Ramot, M., Kramer, U., Kipervasser, S., et al. (2013) Spatial and Object-Based Attention Modulates Broadband High-Frequency Responses across the Human Visual Cortical Hierarchy. The Journal of Neuroscience, 16, 1228-1240. http://dx.doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3181-12.2013
Ogawa, S., Sung, Y., Kamba, M. and Nagaoka, T. (2003) Probing the Temporal Dynamics of the Functional System Interaction in the Brain by Functional MRI. Advances in Neurological Sciences, 47, 902-908.
Bressler, D., Fortenbaugh, F., Robertson, L. and Silver, M. (2013) Visual Spatial Attention Enhances the Amplitude of Positive and Negative fMRI Responses to Visual Stimulation in an Eccentricity-Dependent Manner. Vision Research, 85, 104-112. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2013.03.009
Bressler, D. and Silver, M. (2010) Spatial Attention Improves Reliability of fMRI Retinotopic Mapping Signals in Occipital and Parietal Cortex. Neuroimage, 53, 526-533. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.06.063
Levy, I., Hasson, U., Avidan, G., Hendler, T. and Malach, R. (2001) Center-Periphery Organization of Human Object Areas. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 533-539.
Hemond, C., Kanwisher, N. and Op de Beeck, H. (2007) A Preference for Contralateral Stimuli in Human Object-and Face-Selective Cortex. PLoS ONE, 2, e574. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0000574
Pernet, C., Schyns, P. and Demonet, J.-F. (2007) Specific, Selective or Preferential: Comments on Category Specificity in Neuroimaging. Neuroimage, 35, 991-997. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.01.017
Sowden, P.T. and Schynes, P.G. (2006) Channel Surfing in the Visual Brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 538-545. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2006.10.007
Haynes, J.D. and Rees, G. (2006) Decoding Mental States from Brain Activity in Humans. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 7, 523-534. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrn1931
Mourao-Miranda, J., Bokde, A.L.W. and Born, C. (2005) Classifying Brain States and Determining the Discriminating Activation Patterns: Support Vector Machine on Functional MRI Data. Neuroimage, 28, 980-995. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.06.070
Norman, K.A., Polyn, S.M., Detre, G.J. and Haxby, J.V. (2006) Beyond Mind-Reading: Multi-Voxel Pattern Analysis of fMRI Data. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 424-430. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2006.07.005
Johnson, J.D., McDuff, S.G.R., Rugg, M.D. and Norman, K.A. (2009) Recollection, Familiarity and Cortical Reinstatement: A Multivoxel Pattern Analysis. Neuron, 63, 697-708. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2009.08.011
Schyns, P.G., Gosselin, F. and Smith, M.L. (2008) Information Processing Algorithms in the Brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13, 20-26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2008.09.008
Eger, E., Henson, R.N., Driver, J. and Doaln, R.J. (2004) BOLD Repetition Decreases in Object-Responsive Ventral Visual Areas Depend on Spatial Attention. Journal of Neurophysiology, 92, 1241-1247. http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/jn.00206.2004
Grill-Spector, K. and Malach, R. (2001) fMR-Adaptation: A Tool for Studying the Functional Properties of Human Cortical Neurons. Acta Psychologica, 107, 293-321. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0001-6918(01)00019-1
Henson, R.N., Shallice, T., Gorno-Tempini, M.L. and Dolan, R.J. (2002) Face Repetition Effects in Implicit and Explicit Memory Tests as Measured by fMRI. Cerebral Cortex, 12, 178-186. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cercor/12.2.178
James, T.W. and Gauthier, I. (2007) Repetition-Induced Changes in BOLD Response Reflect Accumulation of Neural Activity. Human Brain Mapping, 27, 37-46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.20165
Schweinberger, S.R., Huddy, V. and Burton, A.M. (2004) N250r: A Face-Selective Brain Response to Stimulus Repetitions. Neuroreport, 15, 1501-1505. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.wnr.0000131675.00319.42
Winston, J.S., Henson, R.N., Fine-Goulden, M.R. and Dolan, R.J. (2004) fMRI-Adaptation Reveals Dissociable Neural Representations of Identity and Expression in Face Perception. Journal of Neurophysiology, 92, 1830-1839. http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/jn.00155.2004
Sung, Y., Someya, Y., Eriko, Y., Choi, S.-H., Cho, Z.-H., and Ogawa, S. (2011) Involvement of Low-Level Visual Areas in Hemispheric Superiority for Face Processing. Brain Research, 1366, 54-59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2010.10.020
Rauss, K., Pourtois, G., Vuilleumier, P. and Schwartz, S. (2009) Attentional Load Modifies Early Activity in Human Primary Visual Cortex. Human Brain Mapping, 30, 1723-1733. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.20636